대한치과보철학회지 (The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics)

  • 제57권2호
  • /
  • Pages.95-101
  • /
  • 2019
  • /
  • 0301-2875(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2005-3789(eISSN)
대한치과보철학회 (The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

레진 시멘트와 코발트 크롬 합금의 미세인장결합강도에 다양한 프라이머들이 미치는 영향

Effects of primers on the microtensile bond strength of resin cements to cobalt-chromium alloy

  • 정홍택 (고려대학교 구로병원 임상치의학연구소) ;
  • ;
  • 박진홍 (고려대학교 구로병원 임상치의학연구소) ;
  • 신주희 (고려대학교 구로병원 임상치의학연구소) ;
  • 이정열 (고려대학교 구로병원 임상치의학연구소)
  • Jung, Hong-Taek (Institute for Clinical Dental Research, Korea University Medical Center, Korea University) ;
  • Campana, Shiela A. (Institute for Clinical Dental Research, Korea University Medical Center, Korea University) ;
  • Park, Jin-Hong (Institute for Clinical Dental Research, Korea University Medical Center, Korea University) ;
  • Shin, Joo-Hee (Institute for Clinical Dental Research, Korea University Medical Center, Korea University) ;
  • Lee, Jeong-Yol (Institute for Clinical Dental Research, Korea University Medical Center, Korea University)
  • 투고 : 2018.09.05
  • 심사 : 2019.01.25
  • 발행 : 2019.04.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

목적: 레진 시멘트와 코발트 크롬 합금 간의 미세인장결합강도에 다양한 프라이머들이 미치는 영향을 평가하기 위한 것이다. 재료 및 방법: 본 실험에서는 4개의 프라이머(Universal primer, Metal primer II, Alloy primer, and Metal/Zirconia primer)와 2개의 레진 시멘트(Panavia F2.0, G-CEM LinkAce)를 사용하였고, 길이 6 mm, 폭 1 mm, 두께 1 mm의 150개의 코발트 크롬 빔들이 캐스팅 과정을 통해 제작되었다. 150개의 코발트 크롬 빔들을 프라이머와 레진 시멘트의 종류에 따라 프라이머 처리를 하지 않은 대조군을 포함하여 10개 그룹으로 나누었다. 금속과 레진시멘트를 산화알루미늄($125{\mu}m$ 크기)으로 샌드블라스팅 처리한 후 실리콘 틀을 이용하여 접착시켰다. 실험 전에, 입체현미경(stereomicroscope)을 이용하여 모든 금속-레진 빔들을 검사하였고, 미세인장결합강도 실험을 시행하였다. 통계적인 평가에는 one-way ANOVA와 Tukey's test를 사용하였다. 결과: 모든 그룹들의 평균 미세인장결합강도는 20 - 28 MPa이었으며, 그룹 간에 통계적으로 유의한 차이는 없었다. Panavia F2.0과 G-CEM LinkAce 그룹 모두에서 접착 파절과 응집 파절이 동시에 나타나는 혼합 파절이 가장 흔하게 일어난 파절 양태였다. 결론: 모든 실험군들의 미세인장결합강도는 상대적으로 높았지만, 본 실험에서는 프라이머의 사용이 Panavia F2.0 및 G-CEM LinkAce 레진시멘트와 코발트 크롬 합금 사이의 미세인장결합강도를 증가시키지 않았다.

Purpose: The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of various primers on the microtensile bond strength (${\mu}TBS$) of resin cements to cobalt-chromium (Co-Cr) dental casting alloy. Materials and methods: Four adhesive primers (Universal primer, Metal primer II, Alloy primer, and Metal/Zirconia primer) and two resin cements (Panavia F2.0, G-CEM LinkAce) were tested. One hundred fifty Co-Cr beams were prepared from Co-Cr ingots via casting ($6mm\;ength{\times}1mm\;width{\times}1mm\;thick$). The metal beams were randomly divided into ten groups according to the adhesive primers and resin cements used; the no-primer groups served as the control (n = 15). After sandblasting with aluminum oxide ($125{\mu}m$ grain), the metal and resin cements were bonded together using a silicone mold. Prior to testing, all metal-resin beams were examined under stereomicroscope, and subjected to the ${\mu}TBS$ test. The mean value of each group was analyzed via one-way ANOVA with Tukey's test as post hoc (${\alpha}=.05$) using SPSS software. Results: The mean ${\mu}TBS$ of all groups was ranged from 20 to 28 MPa. There is no statistically significant difference between groups (P > .05). Mixed failure, which is the combination of adhesive and cohesive failures, is the most prevalent failure mode in both the Panavia F2.0 and G-Cem LinkAce groups. Conclusion: The ${\mu}TBS$ of all tested groups are relatively high; however, the primers used in this study result in no favorable effect in the ${\mu}TBS$ of Panavia F2.0 and G-Cem LinkAce resin cement to Co-Cr alloy.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Ishijima T, Caputo AA, Mito R. Adhesion of resin to casting alloys. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67:445-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(92)90070-Q
  2. Kitasako Y, Burrow MF, Nikaido T, Harada N, Inokoshi S, Yamada T, Takatsu T. Shear and tensile bond testing for resin cement evaluation. Dent Mater 1995;11:298-304. https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(95)80024-7
  3. Kim EG, Lee JH. Resin bonded fixed prosthesis for single tooth restoration: A case report. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2017;55:325-30. https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2017.55.3.325
  4. Weiser F, Behr M. Self-adhesive resin cements: a clinical review. J Prosthodont 2015;24:100-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12192
  5. Yoshida K, Taira Y, Sawase T, Atsuta M. Effects of adhesive primers on bond strength of self-curing resin to cobalt-chromium alloy. J Prosthet Dent 1997;77:617-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70104-5
  6. Freitas AP, Francisconi PA. Effect of a metal primer on the bond strength of the resin-metal interface. J Appl Oral Sci 2004;12:113-6. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572004000200006
  7. Dundar M, Gungor MA, Cal E, Darcan A, Erdem A. Evaluation of metal bond strength to dentin and enamel using different adhesives and surface treatments. Gen Dent 2007;55:204-9.
  8. Di Francescantonio M, Oliveira MT, Daroz LG, Henriques GE, Giannini M. Adhesive bonding of resin cements to cast titanium with adhesive primers. Braz Dent J 2012;23:218-22. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-64402012000300006
  9. Choo SS, Huh YH, Cho LR, Park CJ. Effect of metal primers and tarnish treatment on bonding between dental alloys and veneer resin. J Adv Prosthodont 2015;7:392-9. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2015.7.5.392
  10. Di Francescantonio M, de Oliveira MT, Garcia RN, Romanini JC, da Silva NR, Giannini M. Bond strength of resin cements to Co-Cr and Ni-Cr metal alloys using adhesive primers. J Prosthodont 2010;19:125-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2009.00534.x
  11. Fonseca RG, de Almeida JG, Haneda IG, Adabo GL. Effect of metal primers on bond strength of resin cements to base metals. J Prosthet Dent 2009;101:262-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60050-0
  12. Ferrari M, Goracci C, Sadek F, Eduardo P, Cardoso C. Microtensile bond strength tests: scanning electron microscopy evaluation of sample integrity before testing. Eur J Oral Sci 2002;110:385-91. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0722.2002.21317.x
  13. Sano H, Shono T, Sonoda H, Takatsu T, Ciucchi B, Carvalho R, Pashley DH. Relationship between surface area for adhesion and tensile bond strength-evaluation of a micro-tensile bond test. Dent Mater 1994;10:236-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(94)90067-1
  14. Braga RR, Meira JB, Boaro LC, Xavier TA. Adhesion to tooth structure: a critical review of "macro" test methods. Dent Mater 2010;26:e38-49.
  15. Pashley DH, Sano H, Ciucchi B, Yoshiyama M, Carvalho RM. Adhesion testing of dentin bonding agents: a review. Dent Mater 1995;11:117-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(95)80046-8
  16. Armstrong S, Geraldeli S, Maia R, Raposo LH, Soares CJ, Yamagawa J. Adhesion to tooth structure: a critical review of "micro" bond strength test methods. Dent Mater 2010;26:e50-62.
  17. Ferrari M, Goracci C, Sadek F, Eduardo P, Cardoso C. Microtensile bond strength tests: scanning electron microscopy evaluation of sample integrity before testing. Eur J Oral Sci 2002;110:385-91. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0722.2002.21317.x
  18. Sadek FT, Monticelli F, Muench A, Ferrari M, Cardoso PE. A novel method to obtain microtensile specimens minimizing cut flaws. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2006;78:7-14.
  19. Van Landuyt KL, Snauwaert J, De Munck J, Peumans M, Yoshida Y, Poitevin A, Coutinho E, Suzuki K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Systematic review of the chemical composition of contemporary dental adhesives. Biomaterials 2007;28:3757-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.04.044
  20. NaBadalung DP, Powers JM, Connelly ME. Comparison of bond strengths of denture base resins to nickel-chromiumberyllium removable partial denture alloy. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:566-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70007-6
  21. Chang JC, Hurst TL, Hart DA, Estey AW. 4-META use in dentistry: a literature review. J Prosthet Dent 2002;87:216-24. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2002.121584
  22. Canay S, Hersek N, Tulunoglu I, Uzun G. Effect of 4-META adhesive on the bond strength of different metal framework designs and acrylic resins. J Oral Rehabil 1997;24:913-9. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.1997.00580.x
  23. Choi SY, Choi MH, Moon HS, Shim JS, Park YB, Lee KW. Comparison of shearbond strength between metal and indirect resin according to the different conditionings. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2017;55:264-71. https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2017.55.3.264
  24. Matsumura H, Yanagida H, Tanoue N, Atsuta M, Shimoe S. Shear bond strength of resin composite veneering material to gold alloy with varying metal surface preparations. J Prosthet Dent 2001;86:315-9. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2001.114823
  25. Kapoor S, Prabhu N, Balakrishnan D. Comparison of the effect of different surface treatments on the bond strength of different cements with nickel chromium metal alloy: An in vitro study. J Clin Exp Dent 2017;9:e912-e8. https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.53877