Earthquakes and Structures

  • 제16권4호
  • /
  • Pages.501-512
  • /
  • 2019
  • /
  • 2092-7614(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2092-7622(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Investigation on seismic isolation retrofit of a historical masonry structure

  • Artar, Musa (Department of Civil Engineering, Bayburt University) ;
  • Coban, Keziban (Institute of Science and Technology, Bayburt University) ;
  • Yurdakul, Muhammet (Department of Civil Engineering, Bayburt University) ;
  • Can, Omer (Department of Civil Engineering, Bayburt University) ;
  • Yilmaz, Fatih (Department of Civil Engineering, Bayburt University) ;
  • Yildiz, Mehmet B. (Institute of Science and Technology, Bayburt University)
  • 투고 : 2018.06.06
  • 심사 : 2019.03.22
  • 발행 : 2019.04.25
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

In this study, seismic vulnerability assessment and seismic isolation retrofit of Bayburt Yakutiye Mosque is investigated. Bayburt Yakutiye Mosque was built in the early 19th century at about 30-meter distance to Coruh river in the center of Bayburt in Turkey. The walls of historical masonry structure were built with regional white and yellow stones and the domes of the mosque was built with masonry bricks. This study is completed in four basic phases. In first phase, experimental determination of the regional white stone used in the historical structure are investigated to determine mechanical properties as modulus of elasticity, poison ratio and compression strengths etc. The required information of the other materials such as masonry brick and the regional yellow stone are obtained from literature studies. In the second phase, three dimensional finite element model (FEM) of the historical masonry structure is prepared with 4738 shell elements and 24789 solid elements in SAP2000 software. In third phase, the vulnerability assessment of the historical mosque is researched under seismic loading such as Erzincan (13 March 1992), Kocaeli (17 August 1999) and Van (23 November 2011) earthquakes. In this phase, the locations where damage can occur are determined. In the final phase, rubber base isolators for seismic isolation retrofit is used in the macro model of historical masonry mosque to prevent the damage risk. The results of all analyses are comparatively evaluated in details and presented in tables and graphs. The results show that the application of rubber base isolators can prevent to occur the destructive effect of earthquakes.

키워드

과제정보

연구 과제 주관 기관 : Bayburt University

참고문헌

  1. Acar, C., Gunduz, Z. and Kara, H.B. (2014), "Modulus of elasticity determination of rocks using comressometer, strain gauge and LVDT", ACE 2014 11th International Congress on Advances in Civil Engineering, Istanbul, Turkiye, October.
  2. AFAD (2013), Republic of Turkey Prime Ministry Disaster and Emergency Management Presidency Earthquake Department, National Strong Motion Observation Network.
  3. Archive (2014), Erzurum Vakiflar Bolge Mudurlugu, Archives of Erzurum Regional Directorate for Foundations, Turkey
  4. Archive (2017), Bayburt Belediyesi, Archives of Bayburt Municipality, Bayburt, Turkey.
  5. Artar, M. (2006), "Structural identification of the Sehzade Mehmed Mosque through static and dynamic analyses", Master of Science Thesis, Bogazici University, Turkey.
  6. Asikoglu, A., Avsar, O., Kuran, F. and Bayulke, N. (2017), "Dynamic desponse of retrofitted Kutahya Merkez Kursunlu Mosque", 3th International Conference on Protection of Historical Constructions, Lizbon, Portugal.
  7. ASTM-D 7012 (2004), "Standard test methods for compressive strength and elastic moduli of intact rock core specimens under states of stress and temperatures", United States.
  8. Basaran, H., Demir, A., Ercan, E., Nohutcu, H., Hokelekli, E. and Kozanoglu, C. (2016), "Investigation of seismic safety of a masonry minaret using its dynamic characteristics", Earthq. Struct., 10(3), 523-538. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2016.10.3.523
  9. Beyen, K. (2008), "Structural identification for post-earthquake safety analysis of the Fatih mosque after the 17 August 1999 Kocaeli earthquake", Eng. Struct., 30(8), 2165-2184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.08.005
  10. Bruneau, M. (1995), "Performance of masonry structures during the 1994 Northridge (Los Angeles) earthquake", Can. J. Civil Eng., 22, 378-402. https://doi.org/10.1139/l95-048
  11. Cagdas, M.S. (2016), Applied SAP2000, Istanbul Gelisim University, Turkey.
  12. Cakir, F. and Seker, B.S. (2015), "Structural performance of renovated masonry low bridge in Amasya, Turkey", Earthq. Struct., 8(6), 1387-1406. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2015.8.6.1387
  13. Cakir, F., Ergen, Y.B., Uysal, H. and Dogangun, A. (2016), "Influence of modified intended use on the seismic behavior of historical himis structures", Earthq. Struct., 10(4), 893-911. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2016.10.4.893
  14. Cakmak, A.S., Moropoulou, A. and Mullen, C.L. (1995), "Interdisciplinary study of dynamic behavior and earthquake response of Hagia Sophia", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 14(2), 125-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/0267-7261(94)00031-B
  15. Clemente, P. and De Stefano, A. (2011), "Application of seismic isolation in the retrofit of historical buildings", WIT Trans. Built Environ., 120, 41-52. https://doi.org/10.2495/ERES110041
  16. Coban, K. (2018), "Determination of the dynamic performance of historical Bayburt Yakutiye (Yeni) mosque", Master Thesis, Bayburt University, Turkey.
  17. De Luca, A., Mele, E., Molina, J., Verzelletti, G. and Pinto, A.V. (2000), "The retrofit of historic buildings through seismic isolation: result of pseudo-dynamic tests on a full scale specimen", 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, New Zealand.
  18. De Luca, A., Mele, E., Molina, J., Verzelletti, G. and Pinto, A.V. (2001), "Base isolation for retrofitting historic buildings: Evaluation of seismic performance through experimental investigation", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 30, 1125-1145. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.54
  19. Dogangun, A. and Sezen, H. (2012), "Seismic vulnerability and preservation of historical masonry monumental structures", Earthq. Struct., 3(1), 83-95. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2012.3.1.083
  20. Dogangun, A., Acar, R., Sezen, H. and Livaoglu, R. (2008), "Investigation of dynamic response of masonry minaret structures", B. Earthq. Eng., 6(3), 505-517. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-008-9066-5
  21. Dogangun, A., Sezen, H., Tuluk, O.I., Livaoglu, R. and Acar, R. (2007), "Traditional Turkish masonry monumental structures and their earthquake response", Int. J. Arch. Herit., 1(3), 251-271. https://doi.org/10.1080/15583050701436980
  22. Erkek, H., Calayir, Y., Sayin, E. and Karaton, M. (2013), "Seismic behavior of historic Malatya Grand Mosque", 2. Turkey Earthquake Engineering and Seismology Conference, 25-27 September 2013, Earthquake Engineering Association of Turkey.
  23. Farghaly, A.A. and Rahim, H.H.A.A. (2013), "Contribution of non-structural brick walls distributions on structures seismic responses", Earthq. Struct., 5(5),553-570. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2013.5.5.553
  24. Gedik, Y.H. and Celep, Z. (2008), "Earthquake analysis and strengthening of the historical Mehmet Aga Mosque in Istanbul", The 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, China, October.
  25. Gumuscu, M. and Turgut, P. (2012), "Physico-mechanical and thermal properties of Karacadag basalt", Tr. J. Nat. Sci., 1(2) 25-29.
  26. Laurenco, P.B. (1996), "Computational strategies for masonry structures", PhD Thesis, Delft University. Netherlands.
  27. Martelli, A. and Forni, M. (2010), "Seismic isolation and other antiseismic systems: Recent applications in Italy and worldwide", Seis. Isol. Protec. Syst., 1(1), 75-123. https://doi.org/10.2140/siaps.2010.1.75
  28. Matsagar, V.A. and Jangid, R.S. (2008), "Base Isolation for Seismic Retrofitting of Structures", Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr., 13(4), 175-185. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0680(2008)13:4(175)
  29. Melkumyan, M., Mihul, V. and Gevorgyan, E. (2011), "Retrofitting by base isolation of existing buildings in Armenia and in Romania and comparative analysis of innovative vs. conventional retrofitting", COMPDYN 2011, III ECCOMAS Thematic Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Corfu, Greece, May.
  30. Mutlu, O. and Sahin, A. (2016), "Investigating the effect of modeling approaches on earthquake behavior of historical masonry minarets-Bursa Grand Mosque case study", Sigma J. Eng. Nat. Sci., 7(2), 123-136.
  31. PEER, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Centre.
  32. Preciado, A., Bartoli, G. and Budelmann, H. (2015), "Fundamental aspects on the seismic vulnerability of ancient masonry towers and retrofitting techniques", Earthq. Struct., 9(2), 339-352. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2015.9.2.339
  33. Pulatsu, B., Bretas, E.M. and Lourenco, P.B. (2016), "Discrete element modeling of masonry structures: Validation and application", Earthq. Struct., 11(4), 563-582. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2016.11.4.563
  34. Ramos, L.F. and Lourenco, P.B. (2004), "Modeling and vulnerability of historical city centers in seismic areas: a case study in Lisbon", Eng. Struct., 26(9), 1295-1310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.04.008
  35. SAP2000 (2008), Integrated Finite Elements Analysis and Design of Structures, Computers and Structures, Inc., Berkeley, CA, USA.
  36. Sayin, E. (2016), "Nonlinear seismic response of a masonry arch bridge", Earthq. Struct., 10(2), 483-494. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2016.10.2.483
  37. Sayin, E., Yon, B., Calayir, Y. and Gor, M. (2014), "Construction failures of masonry and adobe buildings during the 2011 Van earthquakes in Turkey", Struct. Eng. Mech., 51(3), 503-518. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2014.51.3.503
  38. Seker, B.S., Cakir, F., Dogangun, A. and Durmus, A. (2015), "Investigation of structural behaviour of historical Erzurum Lala Pasha Mosque using finite element method", Pamukkale Univ. J. Eng. Sci., 21(3), 82-87. https://doi.org/10.5505/pajes.2014.57441
  39. Seker, B.S., Cakir, F., Dogangun, A. and Uysal H. (2014), "Investigation of the structural performance of a masonry domed mosque by experimental tests and numerical analysis", Earthq. Struct., 6(4), 335-350. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2014.6.4.335
  40. Smirnov, V., Eisenberg, J. and Vasil'eva, A. (2004), "Seismic isolation of buildings and historical monuments. Recent developments in Russia", 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Canada.
  41. Soyluk, A. and Tuna, M.E. (2011), "Dynamic analysis of historical Sehzade Mehmet mosque for base isolation application", J. Facil. Eng. Arch. Gazi Univ., 26(3), 667-675.
  42. Turkish Earthquake Codes (2007), Specification for Structures to be Built in Disaster Areas, Turkey.
  43. Uniform Building Code (UBC-97) (1997), International Conference of Building Officials, Earthquake Regulations for Seismic Isolated Structures, Chapter 23, Whittier, CA.
  44. Ural, A., Dogangun, A. and Meraki, S. (2013), "Response evaluation of historical crooked minaret under wind and earthquake loadings", Wind Struct., 17(3), 345-359. https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2013.17.3.345
  45. Yon, B., Sayin, E. and Koksal, T. (2013), "Seismic response of buildings during the May 19 2011 Simav Turkey Earthquake", Earthq. Struct., 5(3),343-357. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2013.5.3.343
  46. Yon, B., Sayin, E., Calayir, Y., Ulucan, Z.C., Karatas, M., Sahin, H., Alyamac, K.E. and Bildik, A.T. (2015), "Lessons learned from recent destructive Van Turkey earthquakes", Earthq. Struct., 9(2), 431-453. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2015.9.2.431

피인용 문헌

  1. In-plane seismic performance of masonry wall retrofitted with prestressed steel-bar truss vol.19, pp.6, 2019, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2020.19.6.459
  2. Evaluation of a new proposed seismic isolator for low rise masonry structures vol.77, pp.4, 2019, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2021.77.4.481
  3. Effect of near-fault earthquakes on a historical masonry arch bridge (Konjic Bridge) vol.21, pp.2, 2019, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2021.21.2.125
  4. Non-linear Pushover Analysis and simulation of progressive collapse mechanisms using FE Models for Nativity Church vol.21, pp.2, 2021, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2021.21.2.185