Korean Journal of Cognitive Science (인지과학)

The Korean Society for Cognitive Science (한국인지과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Exploring Individual Variables Affecting the Valuation of Time

시간의 가치 평가에 영향을 주는 개인차 요인의 탐색

  • 김영일 (아주대학교 라이프 미디어 협동과정) ;
  • 김영준 (아주대학교 심리학과) ;
  • 김경일 (아주대학교 심리학과)
  • Received : 2019.02.11
  • Accepted : 2019.02.15
  • Published : 2019.03.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Delay of immediate gains/losses brings on additional gaines/losses as much as waiting period. However, there are individual difference in evaluating the value of delayed time discounting on the person. In this study, to investigates the individual differences about valuating the delayed time, it is ascertained the correlation between decisions from intertemporal choice task and individual differences of risk taking/perception, emotion, regulatory focus, and HPSP and BELT, subjective period measuring task. In Addition, it is analyzed the individual differences after classifying good/bad performer of intertemporal tasks and person who perceive long/short about the future periods. As a result, good performers of intertemporal task have high openness and perceive longer about 12 hours, 15 days, 6 months and 5 years. Reconstruction about future temporal length plays an important role on intertemporal task, and it is discussed about necessity of follow up study.

현재 얻을 수 있는 이득/손실을 참고 기다리는 것은 그 시간만큼 이득/손실을 가져다준다. 하지만 사람에 따라 지연 시간에 대한 가치를 평가하는 것에는 개인차가 존재한다. 본 연구에서는 지연 시간에 대한 가치 평가의 개인차를 탐색하기 위하여 시점 간 선택 과제에서의 판단과 위험 지각/수용, 정서, 자기조절초점, HPSP 설문, BELT과제, 주관적 시간 길이 측정 과제의 상관관계를 확인하였다. 추가적으로 시점 간 선택 과제를 수행 성과화하여 수행을 잘 한 사람과 못 한 사람, 주관적 시간의 길이를 길게 지각한 사람과 짧게 지각한 사람의 개인차 변인의 차이를 분석하였다. 그 결과, 시점 간 선택에서 적절하게 선택을 했던 사람들은 개방성이 높았으며, 12시간, 15일, 6개월, 5년의 길이를 더 길게 지각하는 것으로 나타났다. 시점 간 선택의 수행에 미래 시간의 길이에 대한 재구성은 중요한 역할을 할 것으로 생각되며, 이에 대한 후속 연구의 필요성을 논의하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. 강수영, 김효진 (2014). 시간한정 메시지의 시간적 거리, 충동구매성향, 조절초점 메시지가 구매의도에 미치는 영향. 한국광고홍보학보, 16(1), 5-28.
  2. 김세나, 표두미, 이지선, 이준기, 민준호, 신강현, & 김경일 (2015). 한국판 조절초점 척도 타당화 연구. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 29(3), 85-110. https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2015.29.3.005
  3. 김재휘, 박창기, 기태원 (2015, 8). '의무인가 희생인가' 메시지 프레이밍이 공정성 지각에 미치는 효과. 한국심리학회 학술대회 자료집, 서울.
  4. 김주호, 정성현 (2008). 대학생들의 모험스포츠 참여동기와 감각추구성향과의 관계. 한국체육과학회지, 17(4), 653-662.
  5. 박지선 (2013). 청소년의 부정적 정서경험과 충동행동의 관계에 대한 정서강도의 매개효과. 스트레스 연구, 21(3), 175-182.
  6. 박홍석, 이정미 (2016). 정적정서 부적정서 척도(PANAS)의 타당화. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 35(4), 617-641.
  7. 신성만, 송용수, 김정진, 오준성 (2018). 청소년의 충동성과 스마트폰 중독 간의 관계: 지연 할인과제의 활용 가능성 탐색. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 23(2), 345-363. https://doi.org/10.17315/KJHP.2018.23.2.003
  8. 유태용 (2007). 성격의 6요인(HEXACO) 모델에 의한 성격특성과 조직구성원 직무수행 간의 관계. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 20(3), 283-314. https://doi.org/10.24230/KSIOP.20.3.200708.283
  9. 이규영 (2015). 청소년들의 학교 보건교육 수혜 현황 및 건강위험행동과의 관련성. 한국보건학회지, 29(2), 257-271.
  10. 이정윤, 이상희 (2004). 청소년의 음란물중독과 우울, 외로움, 충동성, 감각추구 및 자기효능감과의 관계. 청소년상담연구, 12(2), 145-155.
  11. 이현희, 김은정, 이민규 (2003). 한국판 정적 정서 및 부적 정서 척도(Positive Affect and Negative Affect Schedule; PANAS)의 타당화 연구. Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 22(4), 935-946.
  12. 이홍직 (2012). 고3 청소년의 자살충동에 영향을 미치는 요인에 관한 연구: 개인적 특성 요인, 유대 요인, 정서적 요인, 스트레스 요인을 중심으로. 스트레스 연구, 20(3), 139-148.
  13. 정지희 (2007). HSPS(Highly Sensitive Person Scale) 국내 타당화 연구. (국내석사학위논문), 건국대학교 대학원, 서울.
  14. 최부열, 정경미 (2011). 충동성 측정도구로서 지연 디스카운팅 과제 (Delay Discounting Task)의 상대적 유용성 평가. Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 30(4), 845-869. https://doi.org/10.15842/kjcp.2011.30.4.002
  15. Ainslie, G. (1975). Specious reward: A behavioral theory of impulsiveness and impulse control. Psychological Bulletin 82(4), 463-496. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076860
  16. Aron, E. N., & Aron, A. (1997). Sensory-processing sensitivity and its relation to introversion and emotionality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(2), 345. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.2.345
  17. Aron, E. N., Aron, A., & Jagiellowicz, J. (2012). Sensory processing sensitivity: A review in the light of the evolution of biological responsivity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16(3), 262-282. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868311434213
  18. Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2007). Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11(2), 150-166. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868306294907
  19. Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2009). The HEXACO-60: A short measure of the major dimensions of personality. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91(4), 340-345. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890902935878
  20. Ashton, M. C., Lee, K., & Goldberg, L. R. (2004). A hierarchical analysis of 1,710 English personality-descriptive adjectives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 707-721. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.5.707
  21. Baumann, A. A., & Odum, A. L. (2012). Impulsivity, risk taking, and timing. Behavioural processes, 90(3), 408-414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2012.04.005
  22. Blais, A.-R., & Weber, E. U. (2006). A domain-specific risk-taking (DOSPERT) scale for adult populations. Judgment and Decision Making, 1(1), 33-47.
  23. Cohen, J. D., Ericson, K. M., Laibson, D., & White, J. M. (2016). Measuring time preferences(No. w22455). National Bureau of Economic Research.
  24. Dickman, S. J. (1990). Functional and dysfunctional impulsivity: personality and cognitive correlates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(1), 95. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.58.1.95
  25. Ebert, J. E., & Prelec, D. (2007). The fragility of time: time-insensitivity and valuation of the near and far future. Management Science, 53(9), 1423-1438. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0671
  26. Founders online. 2018. "Advice to a Young Tradesman, [21 July 1748]," Founders Online, National Archives, last modified June 13, 2018, http://founders.archives.gov/documents/Franklin/01-03-02-0130. [Original source: The Papers of Benjamin Franklin, vol. 3, January 1, 1745, through June 30, 1750, ed. Leonard W. Labaree. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1961, pp. 304-308.]
  27. Frederick, S. (2005). Reflection and Decision making. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(4), 25-42. https://doi.org/10.1257/089533005775196732
  28. Frederick, S., Loewenstein, G., & O'donoghue, T. (2002). Time discounting and time preference: a critical review. Journal of Economic Literature, 40(2), 351-401. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.40.2.351
  29. Fredrickson, B. L., & Kahneman, D. (1993). Duration neglect in retrospective evaluations of affective episodes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(1), 45-55. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.1.45
  30. Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The development of markers for the big-five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4(1), 26-42. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.26
  31. Green, D., Jacowitz, K. E., Kahneman, D., & McFadden, D. (1998). Referendum contingent valuation, anchoring, and willingness to pay for public goods. Resource and Energy Economics, 20, 85-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0928-7655(97)00031-6
  32. Halamish, V., Liberman, N., Higgins, E. T., & Idson, L. C. (2008). Regulatory focus effects on discounting over uncertainty for losses vs. gains. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29(5), 654-666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2007.09.002
  33. Han, R., & Takahashi, T. (2012). Psychophysics of time perception and valuation in temporal discounting of gain and loss. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 391(24), 6568-6576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2012.07.012
  34. Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52(12), 1280-1300. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.52.12.1280
  35. Higgins, E. T. (2000). Making a good decision: Value from fit. American Psychologist, 55(11), 1217-1230. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.11.1217
  36. Humphreys, K. L., Lee, S. S., & Tottenham, N. (2013). Not all risk taking behavior is bad: Associative sensitivity predicts learning during risk taking among high sensation seekers. Personality and Individual Differences, 54(6), 709-715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.11.031
  37. Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
  38. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-269. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185
  39. Kim, H., Schnall, S., & White, M. P. (2013). Similar psychological distance reduces temporal discounting. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(8), 1005-1016. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213488214
  40. Lee, A. Y., Punam, A. K., & Brian, S. (2010). Value from regulatory construal fit: The persuasive impact of fit between consumer goals and message concreteness. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(5), 735-747. https://doi.org/10.1086/605591
  41. Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2004). Psychometric properties of the HEXACO personality inventory. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39(2), 329-358. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3902_8
  42. Lempert, K. M., & Phelps, E. A. (2016). The malleability of intertemporal choice. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(1), 64-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2015.09.005
  43. Lewis, P. A., & Miall, R. C. (2003). Distinct systems for automatic and cognitively controlled time measurement: evidence from neuroimaging. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 13(2), 250-255. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4388(03)00036-9
  44. Loewenstein, G. F., Weber, E. U., Hsee, C. K., & Welch, N. (2001). Risk as feelings. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 267-286. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.127.2.267
  45. Madden, G. J., & Johnson, P. S. (2010). A delay-discounting primer. Impulsivity: The behavioral and neurological science of discounting. (pp. 11-37). Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association.
  46. McCrae, R. R., & Costa Jr, P. T. (1997). Personality trait structure as a human universal. American Psychologist, 52(5), 509-516. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.52.5.509
  47. Mogilner, C. (2010). The Pursuit of Happiness: Time, Money, and Social Connection. Psychological Science, 21(9), 1348-1354. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610380696
  48. Petry, N. M., & Casarella, T. (1999). Excessive discounting of delayed rewards in substance abusers with gambling problems. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 56, 25-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-8716(99)00010-1
  49. Pickering, A. D., & Gray, J. A. (1999). The neuroscience of personality. Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research, 2, 277-299.
  50. Richards, J. B., Zhang, L., Mitchell, S. H., & de Wit, H. (1999). Delay or probability discounting in a model of impulsive behavior: effect of alcohol. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 71(2), 121-143. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1999.71-121
  51. Samuelson, P. A. (1937). A note on measurement of utility. The Review of Economic Studies, 4(2), 155-161. https://doi.org/10.2307/2967612
  52. Shamosh, N., & Gray, J. (2008). Delay Discounting and Intelligence: A meta-analysis. Intelligence, 36(4), 289-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2007.09.004
  53. Thaler, R. (1981). Some empirical evidence on dynamic inconsistency. Economics Letters, 8(3), 201-207. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1765(81)90067-7
  54. Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117(2), 440-463. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018963
  55. Urminsky, O., & Zauberman, G. (2015). The psychology of intertemporal preferences. In G. Keren & G. Wu (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making (pp. 141-181), UK: John Wiley & Sons.
  56. Weber, E. U., Blais, A.-R., & Betz, N. E. (2002). A domain-specific risk-attitude scale: measuring risk perceptions and risk behaviors. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 15(4), 263-290. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.414
  57. Weber, E. U., & Hsee, C. K. (1998). Cross-cultural difference in risk perception, but cross-cultural similarities in attitudes towards perceived risk. Management Science, 44, 1205-1217. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.44.9.1205
  58. Xie, X.-F., & Wang, X. T. (2003). Risk perception and risky choice: Situational, informational and dispositional effects. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 6(2), 117-132. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-839X.t01-1-00015
  59. Zauberman, G., Kim, B. K., Malkoc, S. A., & Bettman, J. R. (2009). Discounting time and time discounting: subjective time perception and intertemporal preferences. Journal of Marketing Research, 46(4), 543-556. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.46.4.543