Journal of Trauma and Injury

  • 제32권1호
  • /
  • Pages.32-39
  • /
  • 2019
  • /
  • 2799-4317(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-1683(eISSN)
대한외상학회 (The Korean Society of Traumatology)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Management and Outcome of Patients with Acetabular Fractures: Associated Injuries and Prognostic Factors

  • Yeo, Do-Hyun (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Guro Hospital, Korea University Medical Center) ;
  • Oh, Jong-Keon (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Guro Hospital, Korea University Medical Center) ;
  • Cho, Jae-Woo (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Guro Hospital, Korea University Medical Center) ;
  • Kim, Beom-Soo (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Guro Hospital, Korea University Medical Center)
  • 투고 : 2018.06.02
  • 심사 : 2018.11.05
  • 발행 : 2019.03.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Purpose: The aim of this study was to determine which factors contribute to the surgical treatment outcomes of acetabular fractures. Simultaneously, we aim to report on the treatment results after our hospital was designated as the focused training center for trauma. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of all patients who experienced acetabular fractures from January 1, 2014 to May 1, 2017 and visited our hospital. Patients who had associated pelvic ring fractures or were lost to the one-year follow-up were excluded; a total of 37 fractures were evaluated. We evaluated the clinical results using the scoring system of Merle $d^{\prime}Aubign\acute{e}$ (MDA) and grade of Brooker for heterotopic ossification. Results: Thirty-seven patients (31 men and 6 women) were identified. The mean injury severity score (ISS) was 8.7, with 32.4% of patients having a score >15. The average blood transfusion in the first 24 hours was 0.54 pints. Falling was the most common injury mechanism (32.4%). Chest injury was the most common associated injury (16.2%), followed by head injury (13.5%). The posterior wall and both column fracture were the most common (37.8%) fracture patterns. Excellent and good clinical grades of MDA included 28 patients (75.6%) and fair and poor grades included nine (24.3%), respectively. Four patients were diagnosed with a post-operative infection (10.8%); one out of four patients who had co-morbidity died (2.7%), and another patient underwent a replacement surgery (2.7%). Multivariate analysis showed that age and operation time were associated with MDA. In addition, operation time and ISS were significant co-factors of the Brooker grade. Conclusions: Korea University Guro Hospital showed similar treatment results of acetabular fractures compared to other publications. The age and operation time were co-factors of the clinical outcome of this fracture. Additionally, increased operation time and injury severity score were suggested to increase the Brooker grade.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Bircher M, Giannoudis PV. Pelvic trauma management within the UK: a reflection of a failing trauma service. Injury 2004;35:2-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-1383(03)00292-4
  2. Riemer BL, Butterfield SL, Diamond DL, Young JC, Raves JJ, Cottington E, et al. Acute mortality associated with injuries to the pelvic ring: the role of early patient mobilization and external fixation. J Trauma 1993;35:671-5; discussion 676-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-199311000-00003
  3. Dalal SA, Burgess AR, Siegel JH, Young JW, Brumback RJ, Poka A, et al. Pelvic fracture in multiple trauma: classification by mechanism is key to pattern of organ injury, resuscitative requirements, and outcome. J Trauma 1989;29:981-1000; discussion 1000-2. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-198907000-00012
  4. Hauschild O, Strohm PC, Culemann U, Pohlemann T, Suedkamp NP, Koestler W, et al. Mortality in patients with pelvic fractures: results from the German pelvic injury register. J trauma 2008;64:449-55. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e31815982b1
  5. Giannoudis PV, Grotz MR, Papakostidis C, Dinopoulos H. Operative treatment of displaced fractures of the acetabulum. A meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005;87:2-9.
  6. Bhandari M, Matta J, Ferguson T, Matthys G. Predictors of clinical and radiological outcome in patients with fractures of the acetabulum and concomitant posterior dislocation of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006;88:1618-24.
  7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Surgical Site Infection (SSI) Event Procedure-associated Module [Internet]. Seoul: CDC 2017 [cited 2018 Nov 1]. Available from: www.cdc.gov/nhsn/PDFs/pscmanual/9pscssicurrent.pdf.
  8. Letournel E. Acetabulum fractures: classification and management. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1980;(151):81-106.
  9. Brooker AF, Bowerman JW, Robinson RA, Riley LH Jr. Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement. Incidence and a method of classification. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1973;55:1629-32. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-197355080-00006
  10. Laird A, Keating JF. Acetabular fractures: a 16-year prospective epidemiological study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005;87:969-73. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.87B7.16017
  11. Meena UK, Tripathy SK, Sen RK, Aggarwal S, Behera P. Predictors of postoperative outcome for acetabular fractures. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2013;99:929-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2013.09.004
  12. Moed BR, Paul HY, Gruson KI. Functional outcomes of acetabular fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003;85:1879-83. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200310000-00002
  13. Borrelli J Jr, Goldfarb C, Ricci W, Wagner JM, Engsberg JR. Functional outcome after isolated acetabular fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2002;16:73-81. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005131-200202000-00001
  14. Murphy D, Kaliszer M, Rice J, McElwain JP. Outcome after acetabular fracture. Prognostic factors and their inter-relationships. Injury 2003;34:512-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-1383(02)00349-2
  15. Goulet JA, Bray TJ. Complex acetabular fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989;(240):9-20.
  16. Cole JD, Bolhofner BR. Acetabular fracture fixation via a modified Stoppa limited intrapelvic approach. Description of operative technique and preliminary treatment results. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1994;(305):112-23.
  17. Starr AJ, Watson JT, Reinert CM, Jones AL, Whitlock S, Griffin DR, et al. Complications following the “T extensile” approach: a modified extensile approach for acetabular fracture surgery-report of forty-three patients. J Orthop Trauma 2002;16:535-42. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005131-200209000-00001
  18. Stockle U, Hoffmann R, Sudkamp N, Reindl R, Haas NP. Treatment of complex acetabular fractures through a modified extended iliofemoral approach. J Orthop Trauma 2002;16:220-30. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005131-200204000-00002
  19. Briffa N, Pearce R, Hill AM, Bircher M. Outcomes of acetabular fracture fixation with ten years' follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2011;93:229-36.
  20. Liebergall M, Mosheiff R, Low J, Goldvirt M, Matan Y, Segal D. Acetabular fractures. Clinical outcome of surgical treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1999;(366):205-16.
  21. Porter SE, Schroeder AC, Dzugan SS, Graves ML, Zhang L, Russell GV. Acetabular fracture patterns and their associated injuries. J Orthop Trauma 2008;22:165-70. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e318165918b
  22. Matta JM, Anderson LM, Epstein HC, Hendricks P. Fractures of the acetabulum. A retrospective analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1986;(205):230-40.
  23. Webb LX, Bosse MJ, Mayo KA, Lange RH, Miller ME, Swiontkowski MF. Results in patients with craniocerebral trauma and an operatively managed acetabular fracture. J Orthop Trauma 1990;4:376-82. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005131-199012000-00002
  24. Dong JL, Zhou DS. Management and outcome of open pelvic fractures: a retrospective study of 41 cases. Injury 2011;42:1003-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2011.01.032
  25. Ghalambor N, Matta JM, Bernstein L. Heterotopic ossification following operative treatment of acetabular fracture. An analysis of risk factors. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1994;(305):96-105.
  26. Tscherne H, Pohlemann T. Tscherne Unfallchirurgie: becken und acetabulum. 4th ed. Heidelberg: Springer; 1998.
  27. Matta JM. Fractures of the acetabulum: accuracy of reduction and clinical results in patients managed operatively within three weeks after the injury. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1996;78:1632-45. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199611000-00002
  28. Mears DC, Velyvis JH, Chang CP. Displaced acetabular fractures managed operatively: indicators of outcome. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003;(407):173-86.
  29. Moed BR, WillsonCarr SE, Watson JT. Results of operative treatment of fractures of the posterior wall of the acetabulum. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002;84-A:752-8.
  30. Pohl F, Seufert J, Tauscher A, Lehmann H, Springorum HW, Flentje M, et al. The influence of heterotopic ossification on functional status of hip joint following total hip arthroplasty. Strahlenther Onkol 2005;181:529-33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-005-1352-4
  31. Forsberg JA, Pepek JM, Wagner S, Wilson K, Flint J, Andersen RC, et al. Heterotopic ossification in high-energy wartime extremity injuries: prevalence and risk factors. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009;91:1084-91. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.H.00792
  32. Matta JM. Striving for statistical significance: how important is it? J Orthop Trauma 2000;14:227-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005131-200005000-00001