Journal of the Korea Convergence Society (한국융합학회논문지)

Korea Convergence Society (한국융합학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Connective Validity of Technology Maturity and Industry for Core Technologies based on 4th Industrial Revolution

4차 산업혁명 기반 핵심기술에 대한 기술성숙도와 산업과 연계 타당성 연구

  • Cho, Han-Jin (Dept. of Energy IT Engineering, Far East University) ;
  • Jeong, Kyuman (School of Computer & Communication Engineering, Daegu University)
  • 조한진 (극동대학교 에너지IT공학과) ;
  • 정규만 (대구대학교 정보통신공학부)
  • Received : 2019.01.02
  • Accepted : 2019.03.20
  • Published : 2019.03.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The core technology development of the Fourth Industrial Revolution is linked to the development of other core technologies, which will change the industrial structure in the future and create a new smart business model. In this paper, tried to analyze the technology maturity level and analyze the technology maturity. To do this, used technology trend information to investigate and integrate the market, policy, etc. Of core technology of the 4th Industrial Revolution to achieve a comprehensive maturity level. Because technology maturity measures are scored by technology developers, prejudices may be acted upon according to a person's tendency, which may be a subjective evaluation. It is also a measure of the maturity of individual technologies, and thus is not suitable for evaluating the overall system integration perspective. However, it is possible to evaluate the maturity before integrating the core element technologies constituting the whole system and to use it as a means to compare the effect of the whole system and its feasibility and play an important role in the planning of technology development.

4차 산업혁명의 핵심기술 발전은 다른 핵심기술의 발전과 연계되며, 이를 통하여 미래에 산업구조를 변화시키고 새로운 스마트 비즈니스 모델을 창출할 것으로 예측된다. 이에 본 논문에서는 기술 성숙도 분석을 통하여 기술 성숙도 수준을 진단할 수 있는 방안과, 기술 개발에 도움이 될 수 있는 연구를 수행하고자 하였다. 이를 위하여 기술 동향 정보를 이용하여 4차 산업혁명 핵심기술의 시장, 정책 등을 조사하고 종합하여 종합적인 성숙도 수준을 수행하였다. 기술 성숙도 측정값은 기술 개발자에 의해 배점되므로, 사람의 성향에 따라 편견이 작용되어 주관적인 평가가 될 수 도 있다. 또한 개별 기술의 성숙도에 대한 측정이므로, 전체 시스템 통합 관점의 평가에는 적합하지 않다. 하지만 전체 시스템을 구성하는 핵심 요소기술들을 시스템에 연계하기에 앞서 성숙도를 평가하여 전체 시스템의 효과와 구현 가능성을 비교할 수 있는 수단으로 활용할 수 있으며, 기술 개발의 계획에 중요한 역할을 수행할 수 있을 것으로 기대된다.

Keywords

OHHGBW_2019_v10n3_49_f0001.png 이미지

Fig. 1. Technology Readiness Level

OHHGBW_2019_v10n3_49_f0002.png 이미지

Fig. 2. Gap of Robotics Technology with USA by Country

Table 1. Trends in Robot Technology Policy by Country

OHHGBW_2019_v10n3_49_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. Trends in national policy on artificial intelligence technology

OHHGBW_2019_v10n3_49_t0002.png 이미지

Table 3. Trends in Bigdata technology policy on artificial intelligence technology

OHHGBW_2019_v10n3_49_t0003.png 이미지

Table 4. Trends in IoT technology policy on artificial intelligence technology

OHHGBW_2019_v10n3_49_t0004.png 이미지

Table 5. Trends in Cloud computing technology policy on artificial intelligence technology

OHHGBW_2019_v10n3_49_t0005.png 이미지

Table 6. Trends in 3D Printing technology policy on artificial intelligence technology

OHHGBW_2019_v10n3_49_t0006.png 이미지

Table 7. Trends in Block chain technology policy on artificial intelligence technology

OHHGBW_2019_v10n3_49_t0007.png 이미지

Table 8. Comparison of domestic technology level with countries that have the best technology of Artificial Intelligence

OHHGBW_2019_v10n3_49_t0008.png 이미지

Table 9. Comparison of domestic technology level with countries that have the best technology of Bigdata

OHHGBW_2019_v10n3_49_t0009.png 이미지

Table 10. Comparison of domestic technology level with countries that have the best technology of IoT

OHHGBW_2019_v10n3_49_t0010.png 이미지

Table 11. Comparison of domestic technology level with countries that have the best technology of cloud computing

OHHGBW_2019_v10n3_49_t0011.png 이미지

Table 12. Comparison of domestic technology level with countries that have the best technology of 3D printing

OHHGBW_2019_v10n3_49_t0012.png 이미지

Table 13. Comparison of domestic technology level with countries that have the best technology of block chain

OHHGBW_2019_v10n3_49_t0013.png 이미지

References

  1. S. Y. Jeon & S. G. An. (2018). Analysis of 4th Industrial Revolution Technology Competitiveness and Implications: Focusing on Internet of Things, Korea Institute of Science & Technology Evaluation and Planning. 2-24
  2. Institute for Information and Communications Technology Promotion. (2018). Evaluation of technology level and improvement of technology level for major technology leading the 4th industrial revolution. 6-18
  3. Korea Development Institute. (2018). Check current status of South Korea's big data industry with papers and patents. 14-24
  4. Institute for Information and Communications Technology Promotion. (2017). Technology trend and R & D direction of cloud computing.
  5. Institute for Information and Communications Technology Promotion. (2018). Analysis of public data openness of major countries in response to the fourth industrial revolution era. 4-8
  6. Korea Institute of Science & Technology Evaluation and Planning. (2018). Analysis of World Competitiveness Report 2017-2018 of World Economic Forum (WEF). 2-11
  7. National Assembly Research Service. (2017). Research on technology maturity evaluation method and application plan for reliability of R & D project.
  8. Korea Institute of Science & Technology Evaluation and Planning. (2016). Medium-long term technology development plan. 1123-1220
  9. D. G. Gim, Y. B. Lee, S. J. Gang & D. N. Choi. (2011). A Study on the Estimation Coefficient of R & D Cost of Guided Weapon System using TRL, Korea Association of Defense Industry Studies, 18(2), 26-40.
  10. Ministry of Science and ICT. (2017). Evaluation of the National Science and Technology Innovation Capacity in 2017. 4-12.
  11. Institute for Information and Communications Technology Promotion. (2018). ICT R & D Technology Roadmap 2023 Report.
  12. Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy. (2017). Robot industry competitiveness survey in 2017. 3-49.
  13. Korean Intellectual Property Office. (2016). National Patent Strategy Blueprint Construction Project - Robotics Field.
  14. Security Management Institute. (2011). KISTEP Technology Trends Brief - Artificial Intelligence.
  15. Institute for Information and Communications Technology Promotion. (2017). Japan's AI policy trends and implementation strategies.
  16. Korea Association for ICT Promotion. (2017). 3D Printing Industry Status and Trend Survey in 2017
  17. Korea Institute of Science & Technology Evaluation and Planning. (2018). KISTEP Technology Trends Brief - Big Data.
  18. Korea Institute of Science & Technology Evaluation and Planning. (2018). KISTEP Statistics Brief - 2017.1 - 2017.12.
  19. National IT Industry Promotion Agency. (2018). Policy trends of nurturing human resources for the fourth industrial revolution in overseas major countries. 4-21.
  20. National IT Industry Promotion Agency. (2018). Current Status and Challenges of Cloud Computing. 17-33.
  21. Ministry of Science and ICT. (2018) 2017 BIG DATA Market Status Survey. 21-34.
  22. Institute for Information and Communications Technology Promotion. (2014). The core of 3D printing, software.
  23. Institute for Information and Communications Technology Promotion. (2018). Block Chain Industry Status and Trend. 3-13.