DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

이용자 중심 대중교통 가치평가 체계제안과 제주지역 적용 연구

Suggestion of user-centered public transportation value evaluation system and applied research in Jeju area

  • Hwang, Kyung-Soo (Department of administration, Jeju National University) ;
  • Yang, Jeong-Cheol (Department of administration, Jeju National University) ;
  • Jo, Hang-Woo (Department of administration, Jeju National University) ;
  • Lee, Gwan-Hong (Department of administration, Jeju National University)
  • 투고 : 2018.10.12
  • 심사 : 2019.02.01
  • 발행 : 2019.02.28

초록

본 연구의 목적은 대중교통 가치평가 체계 안을 구축하고, 적용해봄으로서 제도화하는 데에 필요한 정책제언을 하고자 하는 것에 있다. 지난 6년간 제주지역은 지속적으로 유입인구가 증가함에 따라 차량보유대수도 꾸준히 증가하고 있다. 또한 관광객은 단체관광객에서 개별관광객으로 개편됨에 따라 렌트카 차량 이용률이 급증하고 있다. 이에 따라 제주시내 도로 상황은 서울만큼 혼잡해지고 있다. 이에 제주도에서는 2017년 8월 대중교통 체계개편을 통하여 이용자가'더 빠르고, 더 편리하고, 더 저렴하게'이용할 수 있은 토대를 만들어 대중교통의 질적 향상을 가져왔다는 평가를 받고 있다. 이는 대중교통가치평가를 통해서도 나타나고 있다. 대중교통우선정책 강화에 대해서는 제주도민들은 긍정적이었다. 또한 대중교통 가치 평가에서는 대중교통요금, 대중교통의 안정성, 대중교통은 서민을 위한 정책, 대중교통은 교통약자를 위한 정책, 대중교통은 도민들의 편리한 정책, 대중교통은 친환경 정책, 대중교통은 교통 혼잡 해소에 도움 등의 순으로 높게 평가되고 있다. 이는 대중교통의 가치가 다양하고, 지방정부 정책으로서 평가를 해야 하는 요소들을 더욱더 세부화해야 한다는 점이다. 이러한 평가방법은 대중교통의 가치평가 체계구축사업을 통해 제도화되고 적극적으로 활용될 필요가 있다.

The purpose of this study is to establish and apply a public transport valuation system to form required policy for institutionalization. Over the past six years, Jeju has seen a steady increase in the number of cars owned by its population. Also, as the number of tourists has changed from group to individual tourists, the rate of rental car use has increased rapidly. As a result, road congestion in Jeju city is becoming as crowded as Seoul., Jeju Island is said to have created a foundation for faster, more convenient, and cheaper use of transportation through the reorganization of the public transportation system in August 2017. This is also reflected in the Public Transportation Value Assessment. Jeju residents were in favor of strengthening public transportation priority policy. In addition, public transport valuations are highly valued in the order of public transportation fares, public transportation stability, public transportation policies for the common people, public transportation policies for the vulnerable, public transportation policies for residents, environmentally-friendly policies, and public transportation to help ease traffic congestion. This is because public transportation has a wide range of values and should refine the factors that local governments use to evaluate policy. These methods need to be institutionalized and actively utilized through the establishment of a value assessment system for public transport.

키워드

Table 1. The comparative elements for comparing the difference for perception between of public transportation

SHGSCZ_2019_v20n2_622_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. The components of the valuation system of public transportation

SHGSCZ_2019_v20n2_622_t0002.png 이미지

Table 3. General informations of the group about the questionnaire

SHGSCZ_2019_v20n2_622_t0003.png 이미지

Table 4. Opinions on Strengthening Public Transportation Priority Policy

SHGSCZ_2019_v20n2_622_t0004.png 이미지

Table 5. Opinion on the total amount of vehicles comeing in from the outside

SHGSCZ_2019_v20n2_622_t0005.png 이미지

Table 6. Application of Public Transportation Valuation Item to Jeju Area

SHGSCZ_2019_v20n2_622_t0006.png 이미지

Table 7. Comparison of Public Transportation Valuation Items

SHGSCZ_2019_v20n2_622_t0007.png 이미지

참고문헌

  1. Sang-Yong Han, "A Comparative Analysis on Transfer Effects to Public Transit by Regulatory and Incentive Systems-Using Market Segmentation"-, Regulatory Research, Vol.16, N0.1. 2007.
  2. Jeju Special Self-Governing Province, "An Analysis of Capacity for Demand and Supply Management by Increasing Vehicle", 2018.
  3. Jeju Special Self-Governing Province, "Public transportation reform data", Department of Public Transportation, 2018.
  4. Jeju Special Self-Governing Province, "Department of Public Transportation", Internal data. 2018.
  5. jejuilbo, "Jeju Public Transportation User Satisfaction the nation's No.1"(February., 11, 2018)
  6. Kim, Wongil, Roh, Chang-gyun, Son Bongsoo, "Service Evaluation Models from Transit Users' Perspectives", Journal of Korean Society of Transportation, Vol.30 No.1, 2012. DOI : https://doi.org/10.7470/jkst.2012.30.1.149
  7. Kap Soo Kim, Dae Woo Kwon, "A Study on Service Evaluation of Public Transportation Using Generalized Time", Research Institute for Industry Journal, Vol.28, No.2, 2000.
  8. Chang Kyun Noh, Tae heon Kim, Bong Soo Son, "A Study of Evaluation Method for Public Transit Systems", KorKST Journal, Vol.62, 2010.
  9. Shin Hyung Cho, Dong Sung Kim, In Mook Lee, Dong Kyu Kim, "A study of constructing public transit performance measures system", KorKST Journal, Vol.66, 2012.
  10. Hyun-Soo Noh, Tcheol-Woong Doh, Won-Keun Kim, Chong-Suk Cho, Seong-ill Shin, "Transit Mobility Measures on the Seoul Multimodal Network"Journal of Korean Society of Transportation, Vol.23 No.8, 20005.
  11. Jung Rae Cho, "A Study on the Improvement of Public Transportation Investment Benefit", KRRL.KorKST, PTA, a seminar on revalue of public transportation, November., 22. 2017.
  12. Joon Lee, "Reassessment of Public Transportation Value through Impact Analysis", KRRL, KorKST, PTA, a seminar on revalue of public transportation, November., 22. 2017.