DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Antioxidant activity and phenolic acid content of Gynostemma pentaphyllum leaves according to extraction conditions

  • Ko, Hyun Min (Major in Plant Resource and Environment, SARI, Jeju National University) ;
  • Eom, Tae Kil (Subtropical/Tropical Organism Gene Bank, SARI, Jeju National University) ;
  • Kim, Ju-Sung (Major in Plant Resource and Environment, SARI, Jeju National University)
  • Received : 2018.07.02
  • Accepted : 2018.11.30
  • Published : 2019.03.01

Abstract

This study was intended to provide basic data for a health functional food study by exploring antioxidant activity of reflux extract according to the concentration of ethanol and the extract of ultrasonic waves extracted and reflux extracted under the same solvent conditions. In the same solvent condition, the reflux extract ($75.10{\pm}1.99mg$) showed a higher total phenol content than the ultrasonic wave extract ($51.74{\pm}2.28mg$). Flavonoids also had a higher reflux extract ($25.05{\pm}1.53mg$) than did ultrasonic extracts ($16.23{\pm}1.95mg$). Reflux extract according to ethanol concentration was found to have a higher phenol content than the 70% ethanol extract ($40.60{\pm}1.49mg$) in 60% ethanol extract. Flavonoid content was also similar to phenol content in reflux extract as determined by ethanol concentration from 60% ethanol ($25.05{\pm}1.53mg$) to 70% ethanol extract ($6.60{\pm}0.46mg$). In addition, the antioxidant activity (DPPH, TEAC, FRAP, ORAC) of the reflux extract in the same solvent conditions tended to be higher than that of ultrasonic extracts. Also, 60% ethanol extract had better antioxidant activity than 70% ethanol extract. However, an analysis of phenolic acid content through HPLC showed that the ultrasonic extract had a higher content in the same solvent condition than did the reflux extract. Not only the presence of phenolic acid, but also those of other compounds are believed to be attributed to the activity of antioxidants. Therefore, further studies are needed to clarify this phenomenon.

Keywords

CNNSA3_2019_v46n1_85_f0001.png 이미지

Fig. 1. DPPH (1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl) radical scavenging activity of Gynostemma pentaphyllum Makino leaf extracts. 60 ER, 60% ethanol reflux extract; 70 ER, 70% ethanol reflux extract; 60 EU, 60% ethanol ultrasonic extract. a, b: Means with different superscript are significantly different at p < 0.05 by Tukey’s multiple range tests.

Table 1. Total contents of phenol and favonoid of Gynostemma pentaphyllum Makino leaf extracts.

CNNSA3_2019_v46n1_85_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. TEAC, FRAP and ORAC of Gynostemma pentaphyllum Makino leaf extracts.

CNNSA3_2019_v46n1_85_t0002.png 이미지

Table 3. Individual phenolic acid contents of Gynostemma pentaphyllum Makino leaf extracts (Unit: mg/g extracts).

CNNSA3_2019_v46n1_85_t0003.png 이미지

References

  1. Bajpai VK, Baek KH, Kang SC. 2017. Antioxidant and free radical scavenging activities of taxoquinone, a diterpenoid isolated from Metasequoia glyptostroboides. South African Journal of Botany 111:93-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2017.03.004
  2. Benzie IFF, Strain JJ. 1996. The ferric reducing ability of plasma (FRAP) as a measure of "antioxidant power": The FRAP assay. Analytical Biochemistry 39:70-76. https://doi.org/10.1006/abio.1996.0292
  3. Blois MS. 1958. Antioxidant determinations by use of a stable free radical. Nature 181:1199-1200. https://doi.org/10.1038/1811199a0
  4. Cho YJ, Chun SS, Kwon HJ, Kim JH, Yoon SJ, Lee KH. 2005. Comparison of physiological activities between hot-water and ethanol extracts of Bokbunja (Rubus coreanum F.). Journal of the Korean Society of Food Science and Nutrition 34:790-796. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2005.34.6.790
  5. Huyen VTT, Phan DV, Thang P, Ky PT, Hoa NK, Ostenson CG. 2012. Antidiabetic effects of add-on Gynostemma pentaphyllum extract therapy with sulfonylureas in type 2 diabetic patients. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine 2012. doi:10.1155/2012/452313
  6. Hwang JH, Park KY, Oh YS, Lim SB. 2013. Phenolic compound content and antioxidant activity of citrus peels. Journal of the Korean Society of Food Science and Nutrition 42:153-160. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2013.42.2.153
  7. Jeong SH, Lee MK, Park MS, Kim JM. 2011. Randomized, double-blind study of efficacy and safety of Gynostemma pentaphyllum ethanol extract in a normal population. Korean Journal of Clinical Pharmacy 21:131-137. [in Korean]
  8. Kang KM, Lee SH. 2013. Effects of extraction methods on the antioxidative activity of Artemisia sp. Journal of the Korean Society of Food Science and Nutrition 42:1249-1254. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2013.42.8.1249
  9. Katalinic V, Milos M, Kulisic T, Jukic M. 2006. Screening of 70 medicinal plant extracts for antioxidant capacity and total phenols. Food Chemistry 94:550-557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2004.12.004
  10. Kim EJ, Choi JY, Yu M, Kim MY, Lee S, Lee BH. 2012. Total polyphenols, total flavonoid contents, and antioxidant activity of Korean natural and medicinal plants. Korean Journal of Food Science and Technology 44:337-342. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.9721/KJFST.2012.44.3.337
  11. Kim KM, Kim AR, Kim AY, Ha JH, Xuan SH, Jeong YJ, Park YM, Jeong HJ, Hong IG, Park SN. 2017. Antioxidative and cellular protective effects of Dolwoe (Gynostemma pentaphyllum Makino) extracts against oxidative stress. Korean Journal of Pharmacognosy 48:125-133. [in Korean]
  12. Ko HM, Eom TK, Song SK, Jo GY, Kim JS. 2017. Tyrosinase and ${\alpha}$-glucosidase inhibitory activities and antioxidant effects of extracts from different parts of Hypochaeris radicata . Korean Journal of Medicinal Crop Science 25:139-145. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.7783/KJMCS.2017.25.3.139
  13. Lee SE, Seong NS, Bang JK, Park CG, Sung JS, Song J. 2003. Antioxidative activities of Korean medicinal plants. Korean Journal of Medicinal Crop Science 11:127-134. [in Korean]
  14. Piao XL, Xing SF, Lou CX, Chen DJ. 2014. Novel dammarane saponins from Gynostemma pentaphyllum and their cytotoxic activities against HepG2 cells. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters 24:4831-4833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2014.08.059
  15. Samec D, Valek-Zulj L, Martinez S, Gruz J, Piljac A, Piljac-zegarac J. 2016. Phenolic acids significantly contribute to antioxidant potency of Gynostemma pentaphyllum aqueous and methanol extracts. Industrial Crops and Products 84:104-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.01.035
  16. Song CH, Seo YC, Choi WY, Lee CG, Kim DU, Chung JY, Chung HC, Park DS, Ma CJ, Lee HY. 2012. Enhancement of antioxidative activity of Codonopsis lanceolata by stepwise steaming process. Korean Journal of Medicinal Crop Science 20:238-244. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.7783/KJMCS.2012.20.4.238
  17. Wojdylo A, Oszmianski J, Czemerys R. 2007. Antioxidant activity and phenolic compounds in 32 selected herbs. Food Chemistry 105:940-949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.04.038
  18. Yim JH, Jang MS, Jung US, Moon MY, Lee HY, Kim YH, Lee GY, Lee NH. 2014. Constituents of collagen synthesis activation from the extracts of Gynostemma pentaphyllum leaves. Journal of the Society of Cosmetic Scientists of Korea 43:289-295. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.15230/SCSK.2017.43.4.289
  19. Zulueta A, Esteve MJ, Frigola A. 2009. ORAC and TEAC assays comparison to measure the antioxidant capacity of food products. Food Chemistry 114:310-316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.09.033