DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Impact on the Performance by Airport Policy and Leadership

공항정책과 리더십이 성과에 미치는 영향 : 공기업 경영평가 수행도의 매개효과

  • Beak, Jeong-Sun (Aerodrome Services Division, Incheon International Airport Corporation) ;
  • Lee, Yun-Cheol (Department of Business Administration, Korea Aerospace University) ;
  • Lee, Yung-Kil (Research Institute of Aviation Industry and Policy, Korea Aerospace University)
  • 백정선 (인천국제공항공사 운항서비스본부) ;
  • 이윤철 (한국항공대학교 경영학부) ;
  • 이영길 (한국항공대학교 항공정책산업연구소)
  • Received : 2019.01.21
  • Accepted : 2019.02.27
  • Published : 2019.02.28

Abstract

In this article, we verified to influence on the performance through performance management system and public enterprise management evaluation implementation degree by the airport policy and leadership. Data collected from 533 employees of Incheon International Airport Corporation and Korea Airports Corporation. Sample extracted with a simple random sampling. Data analysis adopted structural equation modeling. The results of this research found that airport policy and leadership are the key variables influencing airport performance. This research verified a significant mediation effect on the public enterprise management evaluation implementation degree. Thus, this research assert that positive proposals for airport policy and insightful leadership must be taken. This paper explores new view in the public enterprise management evaluation research and offers practical help to researchers and practitioners in providing a direction for airport performance.

본 연구의 목적은 공항정책과 리더십이 공기업 경영평가 수행도와 성과관리시스템을 통해 성과에 미치는 영향을 규명하는 것이다. 데이터는 인천국제공항공사와 한국공항공사에서 simple random sampling으로 533명의 임직원을 대상으로 설문조사를 통해 수집하였다. 데이터 분석은 구조방정식모형(SEM; structural equation modeling)을 사용하였다. 연구결과는 공항정책과 리더십이 공항 성과에 핵심변수라는 것과 공기업 경영평가수행도는 매개효과가 유의하다는 것을 실증연구를 통해 규명하였다. 따라서 본 연구는 공항정책에 관한 적극적인 제안과 통찰력 있는 리더십이 필요하다는 것을 주장하고 있다. 이 논문은 공기업 경영평가 연구에 새로운 관점을 탐구하고 공항 성과를 위한 방향을 제공하는 연구자와 실무자에게 실질적인 도움을 제공한다.

Keywords

HHHHBI_2019_v23n1_20_f0001.png 이미지

그림 1. 개념적 연구모형 (완전매개모형) Fig. 1. Conceptual research model (Full mediation model).

HHHHBI_2019_v23n1_20_f0002.png 이미지

그림 2. 경로분석 Fig. 2. Path analysis results.

표 1. 변수의 조작적 정의 Table 1. Variables and operational definition.

HHHHBI_2019_v23n1_20_t0001.png 이미지

표 2. 탐색적 및 확인적 요인분석 Table 2. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis.

HHHHBI_2019_v23n1_20_t0002.png 이미지

표 3. 상관분석 Table 3. Correlation analysis.

HHHHBI_2019_v23n1_20_t0003.png 이미지

표 4. 구조방정식 가설 검정 결과 Table 4. Hypothesis test results in the structural equation model.

HHHHBI_2019_v23n1_20_t0004.png 이미지

References

  1. H. D. Lasswell, The Policy Orientation Communication Researchers and Policy-making in Sandra Braman, 1st ed, Cambridge Massachusetts, London: MIT Press, 2003.
  2. Y. Dror, Design for Policy Sciences, 1st ed. New York, NY: Elsevier Publishing Company, 1971.
  3. H. Yoo, and J. W. Kim, Policy Science Principle Theory, 2nd ed. Seoul, Korea: Korea National Open University Press, 2003.
  4. Ministry of Strategy and Finance, 2018 Public Institution Management Evaluation Manual (Amendment), 2nd ed. Seoul, Korea: Ministry of Strategy and Finance Press, 2018.
  5. M. C. Jensen, and W. H. Meckling, “Theory of the firm : managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure,” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 305-360, Oct. 1976. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
  6. Y. Aharoni, “Note-performance evaluation of state-owned enterprise : A process perspective,” Management Science, Vol. 27, No. 11, pp. 1340-1347, Nov. 1976. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.27.11.1340
  7. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport : Aviation Policy Division, Aviation Policy Theory, 1st ed, Seoul, KR: Baeksan Pub, 2011.
  8. S. P. Robbins, Organizational Behavior : Concepts, Controversies, Applications, 10th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 2003.
  9. K. H. Min. Leadership Theory and Development, 1st ed, Seoul, KR: Muyok Pub, 2010.
  10. S. G. Cho. and C. S. Lee, “The effect of management innovation techniques and attributes of performance management system on the business performance of small and medium size companies,” Accounting Information Review, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp. 209-235, Jun. 2010.
  11. K. C. Kim, A study on the determinants of performance in public enterprises, M.P.A, master of public administration, Konkuk University, Seoul, Korea, 2016.
  12. Y. K. Lee, and S. S. Park, “Impact on airport performance by diversity of airport operation,” The Journal of Korea Navigation Institute, Vol. 22, No. 4, pp. 247-263, Aug. 2018.
  13. T. Bovaird, The Political Economy of Performance Measurement Organizational Performance and Measurement in the Public Sector, by A. Halachmi and G. Bouckaert, 1st ed. Westport Connecticut, London: Quorum Book, 1996.
  14. C. Pollitt, “Integrating financial management and performance management,” OECD Journal on Budgeting, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 7-37, Aug. 2001. https://doi.org/10.1787/budget-v1-art9-en
  15. K. H. Lee, The effect of creativity management on innovation and business performance, Ph. D. dissertation, Seokyeong University, Seoul, Korea, 2015.
  16. J. S. Song, and Y. K. Lee, "The effect of self-esteem on operation performance : perspective on air navigation system operator in airport," The Journal of Korea Navigation Institute, Vol. 20, No. 6, pp. 544-555, Dec. 2016.
  17. B. S. Beak and S. S. Lim, "A study on airport operation performance and airline policy in Korea, China, and Japan," in Proceeding of the 2007 Annual International Symposium on Aviation Management Society of Korea, Gyeonggido: Korea, pp. 115-126, 2007.
  18. J. H. Lee, PLS Structural equation modeling analysis on causal structure of performance management in public institutions, Ph. D. dissertation, Chungnam National University, Daejon, Korea, 2016.
  19. D. D. Wilson, and D. A. Collier, "An empirical investigation of the malcolm baldrige national quality award causal model," Decision Science, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 361-383, Jun. 2007.
  20. T. R. V. Davis, and F. Luthans, "Leadership reexamined: a behavior approach," Academy of Management Review, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 237-248, Apr. 1979. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1979.4289022
  21. J. W. Choi, and S. W. Kwon, "A study on the influence of followership and authentic leadership on career success and performance and aviation safety related suggestions," Aviation Management Society of Korea, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 69-101, Jun. 2015.
  22. W. J. Lee, and E. Y. Lee, "The effects of safety-oriented leadership on the structure, conduct and perceived performance in aviation service industry," Aviation Management Society of Korea, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 121-135, Jun. 2004.
  23. T. H. Davenport, D. W. DeLong, and M. C. Beer, "Successful knowledge management projects," Soloan Management Review, Vol. 39, No. 2, pp. 43-57, Dec. 1998.
  24. H. J. Bea, and S. J. Jo, "A study on the effect of leadership on the local government's balanced performance management system," Korea Accounting Information Association, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp. 107-134, Jun. 2010.
  25. K. S. Cavalluzzo, and C. D. Ittner, "Implementing performance measurement innovation : evidence from government," Accouting Organization and Society, Vol. 29, No. 3, pp. 243-267, Apr. 2004. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(03)00013-8
  26. J. L. Pressman and A.B. Wildavsky, Implementation, 3rd ed. California, CA: Berkeley University of California Press, 1984.
  27. S. Donald, V. Meter, and V. Horn, "The policy implementation process : a conceptual framework," Administration & Society, Vol. 6, No. 4, pp. 445-488, Feb. 1975. https://doi.org/10.1177/009539977500600404
  28. C. O. Jones, An Introduction to The Study of Public Policy, 1st ed, Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Pub Co, 1970.
  29. Y. K. Lee, K. W. Kim, and J. W. Park, "The effect of public enterprise management evaluation on business performance : focusing on the Incheon International Airport Corporation," International Business Research, Vol. 6, No. 11, pp. 192-204, Oct. 2013.
  30. P. A. Sabatier, "Top-down and bottom-up approaches to implementation research : a critical analysis and suggested synthesis," Journal of Public Policy, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 21-48, Jan. 1986. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X00003846
  31. R. S. Kaplan, and D. P. Norton, "Linking the balanced scorecard to strategy," California Management Review, Vol. 39, No. 1, pp. 53-79, Sep. 1996. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165876
  32. R. S. Williams, Managing Employee Performance : Design and Implementation in Organizations, 1st ed, Bedford Row, London: International Thomson Press, 2002.
  33. S. Rogers, Performance Management in Local Government, 2nd ed. Harlow, London: Longman, 1990.
  34. T. S. Choi and K. S. Ahn, "An empirical analysis on the influence of government performance management system of local public enterprise in Korea," Journal of Northeast Asian Studies, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 153-182, Jun. 2018.
  35. K. L. Sim and L. N. Killough, "The performance effect of complementarities between manufacturing practices and management accounting systems," Journal of Management Accounting Research, Vol. 10, No. 0, pp. 325-346, Sep. 1998.
  36. R. B. McAfee, V. A. Quarstein, and A. Ardalan, "The effect of discretion, outcom feedback, and process feedback on employee job satisfaction," Industrial Management and Data System, Vol. 95, No. 5, pp. 7-12, May, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635579510088128
  37. Y. K. Lee, An empirical study on the influence in the management performance enhancement of the airport authorities by the public enterprise management evaluation performed degree : using of the moderator and mediator, Ph.D. dissertation, Korea Aerospace University, Gyeonggido, Korea, 2013.
  38. A. Gilbert, and Jr. Churchill, "A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs," Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 64-73, Feb, 1979. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224377901600110
  39. D. W. Gerbing, and J. C. Anderson, "An updated paradigm for scale development incorporating unidimensionality and its assessment," Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 25, No. 0, pp. 186-192, May, 1988. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378802500207
  40. L. J. Cronbach, "Coefficient alpha and the internalstructure of tests," Psychometrika, Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 297-334, Sep, 1951. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555
  41. K. G. Jőreskog, "A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis," Psychometrica, Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 183-202, Jun, 1969. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289343
  42. D. B. Wright, and J. A. Herrington, "Problematic standard errors and confidence intervals for skewness and kurtosis," Behavior Research Methods, Vol. 43, No.1, pp. 8-17, Mar, 2011. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-010-0044-x
  43. D. Freedman, "On bootstrapping two-stage least-squares estimates in stationary linear models," The Annals of Statistics, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 827-842, Mar, 1984. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176346705
  44. J. C. Anderson, D. W. Gerbing, and J. E. Hunter, "On the assessment of unidimensional measurement : internal and external consistency, and overall consistency criteria," Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 24, No. 0, pp. 432-437, Nov, 1987. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378702400412
  45. C. Fornell, and D. F. Larcker, "Evaluating structural equation models with unobservables and measurement errors," Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 18, No. 0, pp. 39-50, Feb, 1981. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
  46. R. P. Bagozzi, Y. Yi, and L. W. Phillips, "Assessing construct validity in organization research," Administration Science Quarterly, Vol. 36, No. 0, pp. 421-458, Sep, 1991. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393203
  47. H. W. Marsh, K. T. Hau, and Z. Wen, "In search of golden rules : comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler's (1999) findings," Structural Equation Modeling, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 320-341, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2