한국항행학회논문지 (Journal of Advanced Navigation Technology)

  • 제23권1호
  • /
  • Pages.8-19
  • /
  • 2019
  • /
  • 1226-9026(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-842X(eISSN)
한국항행학회 (The Korean Navigation Institute)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

조종사 정상 체크리스트와 휴먼에러의 탐색적 사례연구를 통한 훈련방안 개선 연구 : General Aviation 학생조종사를 중심으로

A Exploratory Case Study to Improve Student Pilots' Checklist Training with Correlation Analysis between Normal Checklist and Pilot Human Error

  • 이근영 (한국교통대학교 항공운항학과) ;
  • 손병욱 (한국교통대학교 비행훈련원) ;
  • 박성식 (한국교통대학교 항공운항학과)
  • Lee, Gun-Young (Department of Flight Operation, Korea National University of Transportation) ;
  • Son, Byoung Wook (Flight Training Center, Korea National University of Transportation) ;
  • Park, Sung-Sik (Department of Flight Operation, Korea National University of Transportation)
  • 투고 : 2019.01.06
  • 심사 : 2019.02.20
  • 발행 : 2019.02.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

조종사는 휴먼에러(human error)를 감소시키기 위한 방법들 중 하나로 체크리스트를 사용하여 항공의 안전에 도움이 되는 도구로 사용하고 있다. 하지만 복잡한 체크리스트는 경험이 부족한 학생 조종사들에게는 체크리스트가 작성된 본연의 목적과 다르게 안전에 위해 요인이 될 수 있다. 본 연구는 우선 학생조종사들이 사용하는 정상 체크리스트의 구성항목들을 단계 별로 살펴보았다. 이를 통해 체크리스트를 구성하는 요인들이 휴먼에러를 구성하는 요인들과 어떤 상관관계를 내포하는지 학생조종사들을 대상으로 한 사례연구를 통해 규명하고자 하였다. 탐색적 사례연구를 통해 다음과 같은 시사점을 제안하였다. 학생조종사들이 preflight inspection 체크리스트 점검을 수행함에 있어 기체에 대한 외부점검을 효율적으로 수행하도록 기체구조 또는 동력계통에 대한 전문지식 강화가 필요하다. 비행 시마다 조종사뿐만 아니라 해당 비행기의 정비 담당자가 외부점검을 실시하여 더블체크를 하는 재확인 절차를 통하여 안전을 증진시켜야 할 것이다.

Pilots have used checklist as a valuable tool to improve aviation safety and to reduce human error. A checklist however is too complex for a student pilot to use with less flight experience or time than a commercial pilot. It is agreed upon such complex checklist be a factor to threaten aviation safety for student pilots. This paper has focused on a checklist by dividing it into a couple of basic three flight procedures. Making exploratory case study of student pilots, researchers could analyze the correlation between checklist factors and those of human errors. First of all, it was necessary for student pilots to be educated professional knowledge regarding aircraft structures and engines to perform preflight inspection reducing human errors. Moreover it was recommended student pilots as well as maintenance crew confirm checklist together to enhance aviation safety.

키워드

HHHHBI_2019_v23n1_8_f0001.png 이미지

그림 1. 개념적 연구흐름도 Fig 1. Conceptual flow

표 1. 정상 체크리스트 항목별 기술통계 Table 1. Descriptive statistics for normal checklist components

HHHHBI_2019_v23n1_8_t0001.png 이미지

표 2. Preflight inspection 탐색적 요인분석 Table 2. Exploratory factor analysis for preflight inspection

HHHHBI_2019_v23n1_8_t0002.png 이미지

표 3. Before & after engine start 탐색적 요인분석 Table 3. Exploratory factor analysis for before and after engine start

HHHHBI_2019_v23n1_8_t0003.png 이미지

표 4. Taxi and before takeoff/line up 탐색적 요인분석 Table 4. Exploratory factor analysis for taxi and before takeoff/lineup

HHHHBI_2019_v23n1_8_t0004.png 이미지

표 5. Preflight inspection 피어슨 상관분석 Table 5. Pearson correlation for preflight inspection

HHHHBI_2019_v23n1_8_t0005.png 이미지

표 6. Before & after engine start 피어슨 상관분석 Table 6. Pearson correlation for before & after engine start

HHHHBI_2019_v23n1_8_t0006.png 이미지

표 7. Taxi and before takeoff/line up 피어슨 상관분석 Table 7. Pearson correlation for taxi and before takeoff/line up

HHHHBI_2019_v23n1_8_t0007.png 이미지

표 8. 가설 검정 결과의 요약 Table 8. Summary of hypothetical test

HHHHBI_2019_v23n1_8_t0008.png 이미지

참고문헌

  1. D. H. Kim and S. B. Hong, "Development of integrated data management prototype system for aviation accident and incident investigation," Journal of Advanced Navigation Technology, Vol. 22, No. 3, pp. 198-204, June, 2018. javascript:doSaveRef();
  2. W. K. Lee, "A study of checklist/procedure related human error," Korea Journal of Aerospace Environmental Medicine, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 63-68, January. 2011.
  3. S. Shappel and D. A. Weigmann, Developing a methodology for assessing safety programs targeting human error in aviation, Federal Aviation Administration, Washing, DC, DOT/FAA/AM-06/24, 2006.
  4. R. K Dismukes, "Threat, Stress and Pilot Performance", Soaring, Vol. 79, No. 11, pp. 38-40, 2015.
  5. United States Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration Airman Testing Standards Branch, Pilot's handbook of aeronautical knowledge, United States Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration Airman Testing Standards Branch, Federal Aviation Administration, FAA-H-8083-25A, pp. G-6, 2016.
  6. Federal Aviation Administration, Chapter 32 manual, procedures and checklist For 14 Code of Flight Regulation (CFR) Part 91K, 121, 125, and 135, Federal Aviation Administration, pp. 1-5, 2016.
  7. Cirrus Aircraft, The flight operation manual perspective avionics, Cirrus Aircraft, Duluth, MN, pp. 40-41, 2016.
  8. Federal Aviation Administration, Operation information required, Federal Aviation Administration, Code of Flight Regulation (CRF) 14 Section 91.1033, 2018.
  9. United States Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration Airman Testing Standards Branch, Airplane flying handbook, Federal Aviation Administration, FAA-H -8083-3B, pp. 1-14, 2016.
  10. International Civil Aviation Organization, Annex 6 : Manual of procedures for operations inspection, certification and continued surveillance, International Civil Aviation Organization, ICAO Doc. 8335, pp. 3.4.1, 2010.
  11. International Civil Aviation Organization(ICAO), Use of Checklist, International Civil Aviation Organization, ICAO Doc. 9376, pp. 8.6.4, 1997.
  12. International Civil Aviation Organization, Example from an operator's guidance on the preparation of a cockpit checklist, International Civil Aviation Organization, ICAO Document 9376 Attachment C to Chapter 8, 1997.
  13. P. Foley, and N. Moray, Handbook of Human Factors, G. Salvendy ed. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, 1987.
  14. National Transportation Safety Board, Delta Air Lines, B727-232, N473DA Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport, Texas. August 31, 1988, NTSB, Washington DC, US, Aircraft Accident Report, NTSB-AAR-89/04), 1989.
  15. E. Wiener, and D. Nagel, Human Factors in Aviation, 1st ed. Los Angeles, CA: Academic Press, 1988.
  16. H. P. R. Smith, A simulator study of the interaction of pilot workload with errors, vigilance, and decisions, NASA, Moffett Field, CA, NASA Technical Memorandum 78482, pp. 9-21, 1979.
  17. Aviation Safety Reporting System(ASRS), Air carrier flight crew fatigue reports, Ames research center of NASA, ACN:1523764, 2010.
  18. Aviation Safety Reporting System(ASRS), Erroneous flap setting ; checklist use, Aviation Safety Reporting System, Special Request No. 1503, 1989.
  19. Korea Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (MOLIT), Aviation policy division, flight safety regulations for aeroplane, Aviation policy division of MOLIT, pp. 8-143, 2017.
  20. W. P. Monan, Distraction-A human factor in air carrier hazard events, NASA, Moffett Field, CA, NASA Technical Memorandum 78608, pp. 2-23, 1979.
  21. O. Kilic, O. Gunduz, G. Aydin and I. Alkan, "Determination of consumer behavior in tomato and pepper paste consumption: A Case study from Samsun province, Turkey," International Journal of Social and Economics Sciences, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 119-123. 2011.
  22. R. K. Yin, Applications of Case Study Research : Design and Methods, Applied Social Research Methods Series, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage publication Inc., 2003.
  23. H. Hanif, M. B. Khurshid, S. M. Lindhard and Z. Aslam, "Impact of variation orders on time and cost in mega hydropower projects of Pakistan," Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 37-53, 2016. https://doi.org/10.21315/jcdc2016.21.2.3
  24. R. T. Ogawa and B. Malen, "Towards rigor in reviews of multivocal literatures: applying the exploratory case study method," Review of Educational Research, Vol. 61, No. 3, pp. 265-286, 1991. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543061003265