DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

IPA on the Choice Attribute of HMR (Home Meal Replacement) Products - Focusing on the Comparison among Consumers aged between 20 and 40, or over 50 -

HMR(Home Meal Replacement) 제품 선택속성에 대한 IPA 분석 - 20~40대와 50대 이상 소비자 비교를 중심으로 -

  • Choi, Jung-Hwa (Dept. of Food and Nutrition, Soongeui Women's College) ;
  • Yi, Na-Young (Dept. of Food and Nutrition, Daejeon University)
  • 최정화 (숭의여자대학교 식품영양학과) ;
  • 이나영 (대전대학교 식품영양학과)
  • Received : 2019.01.21
  • Accepted : 2019.02.09
  • Published : 2019.02.28

Abstract

The importance and satisfaction with the purchasing characteristics and choice attribute of home meal replacement (HMR) products for consumers aged between 20 and 40, or over 50. In addition to identify the factors that must be first considered in the development of HMR products importance-performance analysis. 791 consumers aged between 20 and 40, or over 50, living in Seoul have experience in purchasing HMR participated in the survey. The survey consisted of four sections: The purchasing characteristics of HMR, the importance and satisfaction with HMR choice attribute, and general questions. T-tests and IPA were conducted to compare the groups of consumers aged between 20 and 40, or over 50. The factor analysis show the following results: 0.899 for "convenience", 0.094 for "hygiene", 0.871 for "quality", 0.834 for "taste", and 0.822 for "price". The average score of the importance of the choice attribute when purchasing HMR products 3.50. For consumers aged between 20 and 40, the score 3.49. For consumers over 50, the score 3.52. There is a significant difference "hygiene (p<0.001)", "quality (p<0.05)", and "price (p<0.05)". For consumers aged between 20 and 40, the score 3.72. For consumers over 50, the score was 3.78. There a significant difference only in "hygiene (p<0.05)". The results of the IPA demonstrate that the categories that belong to "Focus here" are "new HMR products" and "diverse HMR products" for all consumers aged between 20 and 40 and over 50. Hence, food companies should endeavor to develop new and diverse HMR products first.

Keywords

HGSPB1_2019_v32n1_50_f0001.png 이미지

Fig. 1. Grid of importance and performance of HMR product attribute of consumers.

Table 1. General characteristics of respondent

HGSPB1_2019_v32n1_50_t0001.png 이미지

Table 1. Continued

HGSPB1_2019_v32n1_50_t0002.png 이미지

Table 2. Results of factor analysis

HGSPB1_2019_v32n1_50_t0003.png 이미지

Table 3. Importance difference of HMR products attributes for consumers between 20~40s and over 50s

HGSPB1_2019_v32n1_50_t0004.png 이미지

Table 4. Satisfaction difference of HMR products attributes for consumers between 20~40s and over 50

HGSPB1_2019_v32n1_50_t0005.png 이미지

Table 4. Continued

HGSPB1_2019_v32n1_50_t0006.png 이미지

References

  1. Agricultural Fisheries and Livestock News. 2018. 1 person household, HMR and national food cluster. Available from http://www.aflnews.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=149421 [cited 28 November 2018]
  2. Bum SK, Jun JK, Huo YH, Choi YJ. 2009. A study on the positioning of deluxe hotel in Busan based on consumer's choice attributes. J North-East Asian cult 20:269-281
  3. Chung RN, Lee HY, Yang IS. 2007. What's the consideration attribute on purchasing the HMR? J Korean Soc Food Cult 22:315-322
  4. Jang JS. 2017. The comparative study on the purchase of convenience foods according to the food-related lifestyle in Chinese students. Korean J Food Nutr 30:105-111 https://doi.org/10.9799/ksfan.2017.30.1.105
  5. Jang YJ. 2009. Mature consumers' consumption patterns and selection attributes regarding home meal replacement (HMR). J Foodservice Manage 12:97-119
  6. Jeong YG, Lee IS. 2015. Importance-performance and willingness to purchase analyses of home meal replacement using ecofriendly food ingredients in undergraduates according to gender. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 44:1873-1880 https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2015.44.12.1873
  7. Ju SY. 2012. Study on importance-performance analysis regarding selective attributes of home meal replacement (HMR). J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 41:1639-1644 https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2012.41.11.1639
  8. Kang CH, Kim NH, Lee GH. 2008. Positioning map analysis for imported wine brands by nationality in Korean market. J Tour Manage 10:67-78
  9. Kang HY, Jo MN. 2015. key buying factor and improvement point according to HMR use characteristic by college students. J Tour Leisure Res 27:335-356
  10. Kim BN, Sim KH. 2017. Effects of food-related lifestyle on the importance of selected attributes of diet lunch box. Korean J Food Nutr 30:413-426 https://doi.org/10.9799/ksfan.2017.30.3.413
  11. Kim HY. 2016. The effect of selection attribute of HMR product on the consumer purchasing intention of an single householdcentered on the regulation effect of consumer online reviews-Culin Sci Hosp Res 22:109-121 https://doi.org/10.20878/cshr.2016.22.8.010010010
  12. Kim JS. 2011. Study for the selection attributes and pursuit benefits of processed fishery products. Ph.D. Thesis, Hoseo Univ. Cheonan. Korea
  13. Kim KS. 2018. The influence of HMR selection attributes on repurchase intention of college students: Moderating role of sought value. Culin Sci Hosp Res 24:112-121 https://doi.org/10.20878/cshr.2018.24.2.014014014
  14. Kim MH, Kim JS, Kim SS. 2015. A study on the HMR consumption behavior by the lifestyle: Focus infants food. Int J Tour Hosp Res 29:177-190
  15. Kim SH, Kwon SM, Shin BS. 2007. A study on the effects of using HMR customer's selection attribute on expenditure and purchasing frequency: Focus on customers using foodcourt in Seoul. J Foodservice Manage Soc Korea 10:91-110
  16. Kim SS, Han JS. 2017. Effects of selection attributes for HMR on satisfaction and loyalty: Focused on moderating role of the customer value. Culin Sci Hosp Res 23:10-21 https://doi.org/10.20878/cshr.2017.23.4.002
  17. Kong HS. 2007. A comparative analysis of hotel selection attribute on purpose of use of guests to hotel business center. Int J Tour Hosp Res 21:339-354
  18. Lee BS, Park KH, Cho JH. 2011. A study on the effect of selection attributes on consumer satisfaction and repurchase intention about HMR. Culin Sci Hosp Res 17:85-97 https://doi.org/10.20878/cshr.2011.17.2.006006006
  19. Lee HY, Chung LN, Yang IS. 2005. Conceptualizing and prospecting for home meal replacement (HMR) in Korea by Delphi technique. Korean J Nutr 38:251-258
  20. Martilla JA, James JC. 1977. Importance-performance analysis. J Mark 41:77-79 https://doi.org/10.1177/002224297704100112
  21. Min KM. 2017. Effect of food involvement, HMR selection attributes and repurchase intention - Focused on female consumers. J Foodservice Ind Manage Res 13:49-70 https://doi.org/10.22509/kfsa.2017.13.3.004
  22. Park SB, Lee HJ, Kim HY, Hwang HS, Park DS, Hong WS. 2016. A study on domestic consumers' needs and importance-performance analysis of selective attributes for developing home meal replacement (HMR) products. Korean J Food Cook Sci 32:342-352 https://doi.org/10.9724/kfcs.2016.32.3.342
  23. Park SE, Yi NY, Hong WS. 2016. Segmentation of the home meal replacement product market by food-related lifestyle of Japanese customers. Korean J Food Cook Sci 32:492-502 https://doi.org/10.9724/kfcs.2016.32.4.492
  24. Ra CI. 2018. The effects of selection attributes on attitude and repurchase intention for home meal replacement (HMR): focused on moderating role of brand trust. Culin Sci Hosp Res 24:25-34 https://doi.org/10.20878/cshr.2018.24.3.003003003
  25. Seo KH, Choi WS, Lee SB. 2011. A study on the influence of the selective attributes of home meal replacement on perceived utilitarian value and repurchase intention: Focus on consumers of large discount and department stores. J East Asian Soc Diet Life 21:934-947
  26. Song KS. 2012. Effects of wine selection attributes on satisfaction and repurchase intention: Focused on the moderating effect of wine involvement. J Korea Contents Assoc 12:431-446 https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2012.12.05.431
  27. Sparrowe RT, Liden RC, Wayne SJ, Kraimer ML. 2001. Social networks and the performance of individuals and groups. Acad Manage J 44: 316-325 https://doi.org/10.2307/3069458
  28. Yang DH. 2018. The effects of selection attributes for HMR on satisfaction and repurchase intention: Comparative analysis of convenience store and large market. Culin Sci Hosp Res 24:204-214 https://doi.org/10.20878/cshr.2018.24.3.020020020
  29. Yang HC, Kim JB, Kim AS. 2016. Different perception on product attributes of HMR: Focusing on college students and consumers. J Distrib Sci 14:47-56 https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.14.2.201602.47

Cited by

  1. 1인 가구 성인의 가정간편식 이용과 식습관 실태 vol.24, pp.6, 2019, https://doi.org/10.5720/kjcn.2019.24.6.476
  2. 성별에 따른 중년층의 가정간편식에 대한 소비행동과 선택속성 vol.34, pp.6, 2019, https://doi.org/10.7318/kjfc/2019.34.6.697
  3. 충청지역 일부 대학생의 코로나-19 이후 식생활 변화, 가정간편식과 배달음식 이용 실태 vol.54, pp.4, 2019, https://doi.org/10.4163/jnh.2021.54.4.383
  4. 충남 일부지역 젊은 성인의 밀키트 구매행태 및 영양지수와의 관련성 vol.54, pp.5, 2019, https://doi.org/10.4163/jnh.2021.54.5.534