치위생과학회지 (Journal of dental hygiene science)

  • 제19권4호
  • /
  • Pages.238-244
  • /
  • 2019
  • /
  • 1598-4478(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2233-7679(eISSN)
한국치위생과학회 (The Korean Society of Dental Hygiene Science)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Assessment of Internal Fitness on Resin Crown Fabricated by Digital Light Processing 3D Printer

  • Kang, Wol (Department of Dental Laboratory, Daegu Health College) ;
  • Kim, Min-Su (Department of Dental Science, Graduate School, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Kim, Won-Gi (Department of Dental Laboratory, Daegu Health College)
  • 투고 : 2019.09.27
  • 심사 : 2019.10.23
  • 발행 : 2019.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Background: Recently, three-dimensional (3D) printing has been hailed as a disruptive technology in dentistry. Among 3D printers, a digital light processing (DLP) 3D printer has certain advantages, such as high precision and relatively low cost. Therefore, the latest trend in resin crown manufacturing is the use of DLP 3D printers. However, studies on the internal fitness of such resin crowns are insufficient. The recently introduced 3D evaluation method makes it possible to visually evaluate the error of the desired area. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the internal fitness of resin crowns fabricated a by DLP 3D printer using the 3D evaluation method. Methods: The working model was chosen as the maxillary molar implant model. A total of 20 resin crowns were manufactured by dividing these into two groups. One group was manufactured by subtractive manufacturing system (PMMA), while the other group was manufactured by additive manufacturing system, which uses a DLP 3D printer. Resin crowns data were measured using a 3D evaluation program. Internal fitness was calculated by root mean square (RMS). The RMS was calculated using the Geomagic Verify software, and the mean and standard deviation (SD) were measured. For statistical analysis, IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows ver. 22.0 (IBM Corp., USA) was used. Then, independent t-test was performed between the two groups. Results: The mean±SD of the RMS were 41.51±1.51 and 43.09±2.32 for PMMA and DLP, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between PMMA and DLP. Conclusion: Evaluation of internal fitness of the resin crown made using a DLP 3D printer and subtractive manufacturing system showed no statistically significant differences, and clinically acceptable results were obtained.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Tinschert J, Natt G, Hassenpflug S, Spiekermann H: Status of current CAD/CAM technology in dental medicine. Int J Comput Dent 7: 25-45, 2004.
  2. Rekow D: Computer-aided design and manufacturing in dentistry: a review of the state of the art. J Prosthet Dent 58: 512-516, 1987. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(87)90285-x
  3. Samet N, Resheff B, Gelbard S, Stern N: A CAD/CAM system for the production of metal copings for porcelainfused-to-metal restorations. J Prosthet Dent 73: 457-463, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3913(05)80075-7
  4. Beuer F, Schweiger J, Edelhoff D: Digital dentistry: an overview of recent developments for CAD/CAM generated restorations. Br Dent J 204: 505-511, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2008.350
  5. Vafiadis D, Goldstein G: Single visit fabrication of a porcelain laminate veneer with CAD/CAM technology: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 106: 71-73, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(11)00100-4
  6. Song JK, Park KS, Kim MS, Kwon TY, Hong MH: Accuracy comparison between subtractive and additive methods in fabricating working model. Korean J Dent Mater 45: 89-96, 2018. https://doi.org/10.14815/kjdm.2018.45.1.89
  7. Ender A, Mehl A: Accuracy of complete-arch dental impressions: a new method of measuring trueness and precision. J Prosthet Dent 109: 121-128, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3913(13)60028-1
  8. Choi JW, Choi BC, Kim SC: Marginal fit of the prosthesis fabricated by dental oral scanner and model scanner. Korean J Dent Mater 44: 79-86, 2017. https://doi.org/10.14815/kjdm.2017.44.1.079
  9. Martorelli M, Gerbino S, Giudice M, Ausiello P: A comparison between customized clear and removable orthodontic appliances manufactured using RP and CNC techniques. Dent Mater 29: e1-e10, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2012.10.011
  10. van Noort R: The future of dental devices is digital. Dent Mater 28: 3-12, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.10.014
  11. Stampfl J, Liska R: New materials for rapid prototyping applications. Macromol Chem Phys 206: 1253-1256, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1002/macp.200500199
  12. Hazeveld A, Huddleston Slater JJ, Ren Y: Accuracy and reproducibility of dental replica models reconstructed by different rapid prototyping techniques. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 145: 108-115, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.05.011
  13. Envision TEC: Advanced DLP for superior 3D printing. Envision TEC white papers, Dearborn, pp.1-8, 2017.
  14. Shin DH, Park YM, Park SH: Correlation between UV-dose and shrinkage amounts of post-curing process for precise fabrication of dental model using DLP 3D printer. J Korean Soc Manuf Process Eng 17: 47-53, 2018. https://doi.org/10.14775/ksmpe.2018.17.2.047
  15. Kim SY, Shin YS, Jung HD, Hwang CJ, Baik HS, Cha JY: Precision and trueness of dental models manufactured with different 3-dimensional printing techniques. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 153: 144-153, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.05.025
  16. Moon JM, Kim JM, Bae JM, Oh SH: Evaluation of acceleration aging effect on the deformity of dental 3D printer products. Korean J Dent Mater 44: 53-60, 2017. https://doi.org/10.14815/kjdm.2017.44.1.053
  17. Jang Y, Sim JY, Park JK, Kim WC, Kim HY, Kim JH: Accuracy of 3-unit fixed dental prostheses fabricated on 3D-printed casts. J Prosthet Dent 2019. [Epub ahead of print] https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.11.004.
  18. Kim DY, Kim JH, Kim HY, Kim WC: Comparison and evaluation of marginal and internal gaps in cobalt-chromium alloy copings fabricated using subtractive and additive manufacturing. J Prosthodont Res 62: 56-64, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2017.05.008
  19. Jung JH, Lee KE, Kim YR: Marginal and internal fit of metallic and zirconia copings depending on manufacturing methods. Clin Oral Implants Res 29: 192, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.77_13358
  20. Han MS, Kim KB: Comparison of the marginal and internal fit on the cast and CAD-CAM cores. J Dent Hyg Sci 12: 368-374, 2012.
  21. Pimenta MA, Frasca LC, Lopes R, Rivaldo E: Evaluation of marginal and internal fit of ceramic and metallic crown copings using x-ray microtomography (micro-CT) technology. J Prosthet Dent 114: 223-228, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.02.002
  22. Hwang SH, Yu JS, Han YK: The effect of various coffees on the color stability of self-cured temporary crown resin. J Dent Hyg Sci 12: 342-347, 2012.
  23. Park JW, Bae SS: Color stability of self-cured temporary crown resin according to different surface treatments. J Dent Hyg Sci 16: 150-156, 2016. https://doi.org/10.17135/jdhs.2016.16.2.150
  24. Guth JF, Almeida E Silva JS, Ramberger M, Beuer F, Edelhoff D: Treatment concept with CAD/CAM-fabricated high-density polymer temporary restorations. J Esthet Restor Dent 24: 310-318, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2011.00497.x
  25. Ender A, Attin T, Mehl A: In vivo precision of conventional and digital methods of obtaining complete-arch dental impressions. J Prosthet Dent 115: 313-320, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.09.011
  26. Gonzalez de Villaumbrosia P, Martinez-Rus F, Garcia-Orejas A, Salido MP, Pradies G: In vitro comparison of the accuracy (trueness and precision) of six extraoral dental scanners with different scanning technologies. J Prosthet Dent 116: 543-550,e1, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.01.025
  27. Andriessen FS, Rijkens DR, van der Meer WJ, Wismeijer DW: Applicability and accuracy of an intraoral scanner for scanning multiple implants in edentulous mandibles: a pilot study. J Prosthet Dent 111: 186-194, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.07.010
  28. Papaspyridakos P, Gallucci GO, Chen CJ, Hanssen S, Naert I, Vandenberghe B: Digital versus conventional implant impressions for edentulous patients: accuracy outcomes. Clin Oral Implants Res 27: 465-472, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12567
  29. Jorgensen KD, Esbensen AL: The relationship between the film thickness of zinc phosphate cement and the retention of veneer crowns. Acta Odontol Scand 26: 169-175, 1968. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016356809026130

피인용 문헌

  1. DLP 프린터로 제작된 레진 임시수복물의 3차원적 정확도 평가 vol.42, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.14347/kadt.2020.42.1.35
  2. Scanning Electron Microscopic Evaluation of the Internal Fit Accuracy of 3D-Printed Biphasic Calcium Phosphate Block: An Ex Vivo Pilot Study vol.14, pp.6, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14061557