DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Consumption Quintile Effect on Per Capita Consumption Expenditure of Middle and Older Elderly Households

중고령자 가구의 개인 소비지출 결정에 미치는 소비분위 효과

  • Kim, Soon-Mi (Department of Consumer Sciences, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Cho, Kyung-Jin (Department of Consumer Sciences, Chungnam National University)
  • 김순미 (충남대학교 소비자학과) ;
  • 조경진 (충남대학교 소비자학과)
  • Received : 2019.01.15
  • Accepted : 2019.02.07
  • Published : 2019.02.28

Abstract

This study analyzed per capita expenditure (food expenses, housing expenses, health care costs, and cultural & entertainment expenses) by the consumption quintile for middle and older elderly households in addition to personal characteristics, household characteristics and economic factors affecting it. A sample collected from the 6th KLoSHA in 2016, was 2,983 households. First, among each per capita expenditure, the largest expenditure was food expenses, followed by housing expenses, health care costs and cultural & entertainment expenses. Compared with the first quintile of personal consumption expenditure, the largest increase in the fifth quintile was food expenses, followed by cultural & entertainment expenses, housing expenses, and health care costs. Second, compared to the fifth quintile of per capita food expenses, all other quintile had negative effects, and only the first quintile showed a negative effect compared to the fifth quintile of per capita housing expenses. The first, the second, and third quintile had a negative effect compared to the fifth quintile of per capita health care costs. Compared with the fifth quintile of per capita cultural & entertainment expenses, only the third quintile showed a negative effect. Third, in all quintile of per capita food expenses, the most influential variable from the first quintile to the third quintile was marital status, while in the fourth and fifth quintile included household income. In all quintile of per capita health care costs, health status was the most influential variable from the first quintile to the fourth quintile, and residence was in the fifth quintile.

Keywords

References

  1. Auh, H. S. (2017). Difference analysis on rural and urban household expenditures using Korea welfare panel (Unpublished Master's Thesis). Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
  2. Baek, H. Y. (2010). The consumption structure of Korean elderly households depending on poverty status and family type. Journal of the Korean Gerontological Society, 30(3), 911-931.
  3. Ban, J. H., & Kim, K. H. (2008). The determinants of consumption characteristics and patterns of working poor households. Korean Social Security Studies, 24(3), 1-28.
  4. Choi, H. C., & Choe, H. C. (2014) A study on the consumption expenditure over the revised life cycle. Financial Planning Review, 7(3), 93-125.
  5. Han, J. M., & Lee, Y. H. (2013). Analysis of the effect of increase of one person on consumption expenditure. KIET Industrial Economic Review, 177, 22-31.
  6. Hong, J. K., & Son, J. Y. (2016). A study on the consumption factor of middle-and advanced-age households: Focused on property assets and income by age group. Residential Environment, 14(4), 297-313. https://doi.org/10.22313/reik.2016.14.4.297
  7. Jeong, W. Y., & Jeong, S. E. (2010). A comparison of consumption expenditure patterns and their determinants of low-income and high-income elderly households. Korean Social Security Studies, 26(4), 21-48.
  8. KB Financial Group Inc. (2017). 2017 Korea single person household report. Seoul: KB Financial Group Inc.
  9. Kim, D. H., Lee, S. G., & Park, H. G. (2013). A study on the effects of retirement and retirement period on housing consumption. Korea Real Estate Review, 23(3), 123-134.
  10. Kim, J. H., & Nam, H. J. (2013, June). Analysis of consumption decision factors considering heterogeneity of elderly households: Using quantile regression, Paper presented at 2013 Employment Panel Conference, Seoul, Korea.
  11. Kim, M. J., & Cho, M. H. (2018). Analysis of housing cost burden and residential satisfaction effect of housing welfare policy. Korean Journal of Policy Analysis and Evaluation, 28(3), 107-138.
  12. Kim, M J., & Moon, C. S. (2017). Consumption expenditure patterns of Babyboomer households according to income quintile using cluster analysis. Journal of Consumption Culture, 20(4), 71-91. http://dx.doi.org/10.17053/jcc.2017.20.4.004
  13. Kim, S. M. (2018a). Income poverty and multidimensional poverty of elderly households. Family and Environment Research, 56(2), 175-193. HYPERLINK ”https//doi.org/10.6115/fer.2018.014”https://doi.org/10.6115/fer.2018.014
  14. Kim, S. M. (2018b). Per capita consumption expenditure by consumption quintile of middle and older elderly households. Family and Environment Research, 56(6), 573-588. https://doi.org/10.6115/fer.2018.041
  15. Kim, S. W., Yoon, J. H., Cho, H. S., & Lee, J. H. (2012). A study on the social participation consumption expenditures among older singleperson households. Journal of Consumer Studies, 23(4), 309-336.
  16. Korean Institute for Health and Social Affairs (2017). 2017 Survey of the elderly. Seoul, Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs.
  17. Korean Statistical Information Service (2015). 2015 Household Income and Expenditure Survey. Retrieved February 26, 2016, from http://kosis.kr/eng/
  18. Lee, J. E. (2011). An empirical study of the effect of Korean households'transfer income on consumption expenditure (Unpublished Master's Thesis). Sejong University, Seoul, Korea.
  19. Lee, S. L. (2015). Income composition and expenditure inequality of the elderly household by income classes. Korean Journal of Population Studies, 38(2), 85-111.
  20. Lee, Y. J., & Kim, S. M. (2004). The economic status and an analysis of the expenditure of the single elderly household of men and women. Family and Environment Research, 42(12), 93-106.
  21. Lim, S. H. (2016). The determinants of housing affordability. Korean Journal of Social Welfare, 68(3), 29-50. https://doi.org/10.20970/kasw.2016.68.3.002
  22. Oh, H. I. (2012). A study on the trend of consumption expenditure inequality between elderly and non-elderly households -Using the household income & expenditure survey data from 2003 to 2010 (Unpublished Master's Thesis). Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
  23. Oh, Y. H., & Kim, S. M. (2015). The effects of Engel coefficient, Angel coefficient and Schwabe Index influencing household head’s life satisfaction: according to income quintile. Journal of Korean Home Management Association, 33(5), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.7466/JKHMA.2015.33.5.1
  24. Shim, Y. (2016). Study on the relation between food expenditure and health expenditure of elderly households. Proceeding of Korean Association of Human Ecology Conference, November, 2016, 135.
  25. Sim, H. J. (2017). A study on changes in consumption expenditures of the retired household (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
  26. Son, K. B., Shin, J. W., Lim, E. O., Lee, T. J., & Kim, H. S. (2015). Population aging and health care expenditure in South Korea: A critical review. The Korean Journal of Health Economics and Policy, 21(1), 51-77.
  27. Song, C. J., & Park, K. H. (2015). A study on the determination of expenses for recreational and cultural activities and cross-national comparison of the expenditure levels. Journal of Leisure Studies, 13(4), 127-145.
  28. Sung, Y. A. (2013). Cluster analysis for the consumption expenditure patterns of one-person households of different age groups. Journal of Consumer Studies, 24(3), 157-181.
  29. Yonhap News TV. (2018). Retrieved October 9, 2018, from http://www.yonhapnewstv.co.kr/MYH20181009005200038/?did=1947m
  30. Yoon, J. H., Kim, S. W., Chang, Y. H., Cho, H. S., & Song, H. J. (2010). A panel data analysis of the determinants of health care expenditures among older single-person households. Journal of Consumer Studies, 21(4), 193-216.
  31. Youn, H. M. (2012). Factors affecting persistence of high household health expenditure (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.