Structural Engineering and Mechanics

  • 제69권3호
  • /
  • Pages.257-268
  • /
  • 2019
  • /
  • 1225-4568(pISSN)
  • /
  • 1598-6217(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A new method for infill equivalent strut width

  • 투고 : 2017.10.18
  • 심사 : 2018.09.12
  • 발행 : 2019.02.10
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Infills are as important members in structural design as beams, columns and braces. They have significant effect on structural behavior. Because of lots of variables in infills like material non-linear behavior, the interaction between frames and infill, etc., the infills performance during an earthquake is complicated, so have led designers do not consider the effect of infills in designing the structure. However, the experimental studies revealed that the infills have the remarkable effect on structure behavior. As if these effects ignored, it might occur soft-story phenomena, torsion or short-column effects on the structures. One simple and appropriate method for considering the infills effects in analyzing, is replacing the infills with diagonal compression strut with the same performance of real infill, instead of designing the whole infill. Because of too many uncertainties, codes and researchers gave many expressions that were not as the same as the others. The major intent of this paper is calculation the width of this diagonal strut, which has the most characteristics of infill. This paper by comprehensive on different parameters like the modulus of young or moment of inertia of columns presents a new formula for achieving the equivalent strut width. In fact, this new formula is extracted from about 60 FEM analyses models. It can be said that this formula is very efficient and accurate in estimating the equivalent strut width, considering the large number of effective parameters relative to similar relationships provided by other researchers. In most cases, the results are so close to the values obtained by the FEM. In this formula, the effect of out of plane buckling is neglected and this formula is used just in steel structures. Also, the thickness of infill panel, and the lateral force applied to frame are constant. In addition, this new formula is just for modeling the lateral stiffness. Obtaining the nearest response in analyzing is important to the designers, so this new formula can help them to reach more accurate response among a lot of experimental equations proposed by researchers.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Bazan, E. and Meli, R. (1980), "Seismic analysis of structures with masonry walls", Proceedings of the 7th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Estambul, Turquia.
  2. Catherin Jeselia, M. and Jayalekshmi, B.R.K. (2013), "Modeling of masonry infills-a review", Am. J. Eng. Res., 2, 59-63.
  3. Cavaleri, L., Fossetti, M. and Papia, M. (2005), "Infilled frames: Developments in the evaluation of cyclic behaviour under lateral loads", Struct. Eng. Mech., 21(4), 469-494. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2005.21.4.469
  4. Decanini, L.D. and Fantin, G.E. (1987), "Modelos simplificados de la mamposteria incluida en porticos", Caracteristicas de Stiffnessy Resistencia Lateral en Estado Limite. Jornadas Argentinas de Ingenieria Estructural, 2, 817-836.
  5. El-Dakhakhni, W.W., Elgaaly, M. and Hamid, A.A. (2003), "Three-strut model for concrete masonry-infilled steel frames", J. Struct. Eng., 129(2), 177-185. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2003)129:2(177)
  6. FEMA., E.U.F.E.M.A. (2000), Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, FEMA.
  7. Hendry, A.W. (1981), Structural Brickwork, Halsted Press.
  8. Holmes, M. (1961), "Steel frames with brickwork and concrete infilling", Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, 19(4), 473-478. https://doi.org/10.1680/iicep.1961.11305
  9. Klinger, R.E. and Bertero, V.V. (1976), Infilled Frames in Earthquake Resistant Construction, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, California, U.S.A.
  10. Madan, A., Reinhorn, A.M., Mander, J.B. and Valles, R.E. (1997), "Modeling of masonry infill panels for structural analysis", J. Struct. Eng., 123(10), 1295-1302. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1997)123:10(1295)
  11. Mainstone, R. (1971), "Summary of paper 7360. On the stiffness an strengths of infilled frames", Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers.
  12. Mainstone, R. and Weeks, G., (1972), The Influence of a Bounding Frame on the Racking Stiffnesses and Strengths of Brick Walls,
  13. Mallick, D.V. and Severn, R.T. (1967), "The behaviour of infilled frames under static loading", Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, 38(4), 639-656. https://doi.org/10.1680/iicep.1967.8192
  14. Noorifard, A., Tabeshpour, M.R. and Saradj, F.M. (2015), "Effect of infills on torsion and soft storey in a conventional residential building in Tehran-Iran", Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Seismology & Earthquake Engineering, Tehran, Iran.
  15. Paulay, T. and Priestley, M.J.N. (1992), Seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete and Masonry Buildings.
  16. Perera, R. (2005), "Performance evaluation of masonry-infilled RC frames under cyclic loading based on damage mechanics", Eng. Struct., 27(8), 1278-1288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.03.012
  17. Polyakov, S.V. (1960), "On the interaction between masonry filler walls and enclosing frame when loaded in the plane of the wall", Trans. Earthq. Eng., 2(3), 36-42.
  18. RJ, M. (1974), "Supplementary note on the stiffness and strength of infilled frames", Build. Res. Stat., 13, 74.
  19. Samoila, D.M. (2012), "Analytical modelling of masonry infills", Acta Technica Napocensis: Civil Engineering & Architecture, 1000, 2.
  20. Stafford Smith, B. (1962), "Lateral stiffness of infilled frame", J. Struct. Div., 88(6), 183-226.
  21. Stafford Smith, B. and Carter, C. (1969), "A method of analysis for infilled frames", Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, 44(1), 31-48. https://doi.org/10.1680/iicep.1969.7290
  22. Standard, I. (1893), "Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures", Ind. Stand. Inst., New Delhi, India.
  23. Tabeshpour, M.R., Azad, A. and Golafshani, A.A. (2012), Seismic Behavior and Retrofit of Infilled Frames.
  24. Tabeshpour, M.R. and Noorifard, A. (2016), "Comparing calculation methods of storey stiffness to control provision of soft storey in seismic codes", Earthq. Struct., 11(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2016.11.1.001
  25. Tassios, T.P. (1984), "Masonry infill and RC walls, (an invited state-of-the-art report)", Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Wall Structures.
  26. Te-Chang, L. and Kwok-Hung, K. (1984), "Nonlinear behaviour of non-integral infilled frames", Comput. Struct., 18(3), 551-560. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(84)90070-1
  27. Zarnic, R., Gostic, S., Crewe, A.J. and Taylor, C.A. (2001), "Shaking table tests of 1: 4 reduced-scale models of masonry infilled reinforced concrete frame buildings", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 30(6), 819-834. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.39

피인용 문헌

  1. A new procedure to determine equivalent strut of infill walls with openings for engineering applications vol.173, pp.8, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1680/jstbu.18.00113