DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

디리슈레 혼합모형을 이용한 함정 전투체계 부품의 고장시간 분포 추정

An Application of Dirichlet Mixture Model for Failure Time Density Estimation to Components of Naval Combat System

  • 투고 : 2019.12.10
  • 심사 : 2019.12.27
  • 발행 : 2019.12.31

초록

Reliability analysis of the components frequently starts with the data that manufacturer provides. If enough failure data are collected from the field operations, the reliability should be recomputed and updated on the basis of the field failure data. However, when the failure time record for a component contains only a few observations, all statistical methodologies are limited. In this case, where the failure records for multiple number of identical components are available, a valid alternative is combining all the data from each component into one data set with enough sample size and utilizing the useful information in the censored data. The ROK Navy has been operating multiple Patrol Killer Guided missiles (PKGs) for several years. The Korea Multi-Function Control Console (KMFCC) is one of key components in PKG combat system. The maintenance record for the KMFCC contains less than ten failure observations and a censored datum. This paper proposes a Bayesian approach with a Dirichlet mixture model to estimate failure time density for KMFCC. Trends test for each component record indicated that null hypothesis, that failure occurrence is renewal process, is not rejected. Since the KMFCCs have been functioning under different operating environment, the failure time distribution may be a composition of a number of unknown distributions, i.e. a mixture distribution, rather than a single distribution. The Dirichlet mixture model was coded as probabilistic programming in Python using PyMC3. Then Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling technique employed in PyMC3 probabilistically estimated the parameters' posterior distribution through the Dirichlet mixture model. The simulation results revealed that the mixture models provide superior fits to the combined data set over single models.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Austin, P.C. and Steyerberg, E.W., The Number of Subjects per Variable Required in Linear Regression Analyses, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2015, Vol. 68, pp. 627-636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.12.014
  2. Bendell, T., An Overview of Collection, Analysis, and Reliability Data in the Process Industries, IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 1998, Vol. 37, pp. 132-137. https://doi.org/10.1109/24.3732
  3. Cho, H.J., Lim, J.H., and Kim, Y.S., A Comparison of the Reliability Estimation Accuracy between Bayesian Methods and Classical Methods Based on Weibull Distribution, Journal of the Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers, 2016, Vol. 42, No.4, pp. 256-262. https://doi.org/10.7232/JKIIE.2016.42.4.256
  4. Frigyik, B.A., Kapila, A., and Gupta M.R., Introduction to the Dirichlet Distribution and Related Process, [Technical Report], UWEETR-2010-0006, [Seattle, USA] : University of Washington, 2010.
  5. Garmabaki, A.H.S., Ahmadi, A., Block, J., Pham, H., and Kumar, U., A Reliability Decision Framework for Multiple Repairable Units, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2016, Vol. 150, pp. 78-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2016.01.020
  6. Garmabaki, A.H.S., Ahmadi, A., Mahmood, Y.A., and Barabadi, A., Reliability Modelling of Multiple Repairable Units, Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 2016, Vol. 32, pp. 2329-2343. https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.1938
  7. Jo, I.T., Lee, S.C., and Park, J.H., A Study on Reliability Growth through Failure Analysis by Operational Data of Avionic Equipments, Journal of Society of Korea Industrial and Systems Engineering, 2013, Vol. 36, No. 4, pp. 100-108. https://doi.org/10.11627/jkise.2013.36.4.100
  8. Kim, M-S. and Kim, J.-J., Field Data Analysis for a Repairable System, Journal of the Korean Institute of Plant Engineering, 2017, Vol. 22, No. 3, pp. 3-10.
  9. Kim, Y.-J., Oh, H.-S., and Choi, B.-W., A Study of Reliability analysis and Application on Naval Combat System Using Field Critical Failure Data, Journal of Society of Korea Industrial Systems Engineering, 2016, Vol. 39, No. 4, pp. 49-59. https://doi.org/10.11627/jkise.2016.39.4.049
  10. Kvaloy, J.T. and Lindqvist, B.H., A Class of Tests for Trend in Time Censored Recurrent Event Data, Technometrics, 2019, DOI:10.1080/00401706.2019.1605936.
  11. Lawless, J., Cigsar, C., and Cook, R., Testing for Monotone Trend in Recurrent Event Processes, Journal of Technometrics, 2012, Vol. 54, pp. 147-158. https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.2012.676944
  12. Lee, S.H. and Yum, B.J., Reliability Analysis Procedures for Repairable Systems and Related Case Studies, Journal of the KIMST, 2006, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 51-59.
  13. Lewis, P.A.W. and Robinson, D.W., Testing for a Monotone Trend in a Modulated Renewal Process, Reliability and Biometry, SIAM, 1974, pp. 163-182.
  14. Louit, D.M., Pascual, R., and Jardine, A.K.S., A Practical Procedure for the Selection of Time-to-Failure Models based on the Assessment of Trends in Maintenance Data, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2009, Vol. 94, pp. 1618-1628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2009.04.001
  15. Miller, J.W. and Harrison, M.T., A Simple Example of Dirichlet Process Mixture Inconsistency for the Number of Components, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2013, pp. 199-206.
  16. Miller, J.W. and Harrison, M.T., Inconsistency of Pitman-Yor Process Mixtures for the Number of Components, Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2014, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 3333-3370.
  17. Na, I.Y. and Chang, W., Multi-System Reliability Trend Analysis Model using Incomplete Data with Application to Tank Maintenance, Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 2017, Vol. 33, pp. 2385-2395. https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.2196
  18. NIST/SEMATECH, e-Handbook of Statistical Methods, http://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook/, 2012.
  19. Peduzzi, P., Concato, J., Kemper, E., and Feinstein, A.R., A Simulation Study of the Number of Events per Variable in Logistic Regression Analysis, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1996, Vol. 49, pp. 1373-1379. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(96)00236-3
  20. Percy, D.F., Kobbacy, K.A.H., and Fawzi, B.B., Setting Preventive Maintenance Schedules When Data are Sparse, International Journal of Production Economics, 1997, Vol. 51, pp. 223-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(97)00054-6
  21. Salvatier, J., Wiecki, T.V., and Fonnesbeck, C., Probabilistic Programming in Python using PyMC3, PeerJ Computer Science, 2016, Vol. 2, article e55.
  22. Seo, Y., Lee, K., Lee, Y., and Kim, J., Reliability Prediction Based on Field Failure Data of Guided Missile, Journal of Applied Reliability, 2018, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 250-259. https://doi.org/10.33162/JAR.2018.09.18.3.250