Journal of the Korean Society of Environmental Restoration Technology (한국환경복원기술학회지)

The Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology (한국환경복원기술학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A study of Ecosystem Cultural Services Assessment: case of Wetland Protection Areas

습지보호지역을 대상으로 한 문화서비스 평가 연구

  • Received : 2019.11.21
  • Accepted : 2019.12.24
  • Published : 2019.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

There is often confliction between conservation for protected ecosystem assets and development for various stakeholders at wetland protection areas. The concept of Ecosystem Services can be an alternative solution for the conflicts. This paper attempted to measure and evaluate cultural ecosystem services according to the index evaluation approach. For the evaluation, the paper suggested five indicators of ecosystem cultural services including: inspiration, landscape aesthetics, education, eco-tourism, and heritage. The developed indices of cultural services in this study can be also utilized as a policy support tool for conservation of the wetland protected areas. The result illustrates the ranking and correlation of each indicator of ecosystem cultural services and suggestions for useful means of management policy in wetland protected areas.

Keywords

References

  1. Koo, M., Lee, D. & Jung, T. (2012). A Study on the Contexts of Ecosystem Services in the Policymaking Process. Journal of the Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology, 15(5), 85-102. https://doi.org/10.13087/kosert.2012.15.5.085
  2. Kim, B., Lee, J., Kim, I., Kim, S. & Kwon, H. (2019). Rapid Assessment of Ecosystem Services Apply to Local Stakeholders. Journal of the Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology, 22(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.13087/KOSERT.2019.22.1.1
  3. Kim, M., Choe, J. & Park, J. (2018). A Study of Ecosystem Services Trade-off based on user Perception in Tancheon . Journal of the Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology, 21(1), 31-40. https://doi.org/10.13087/kosert.2018.21.1.31
  4. Kim, H. (2001). Problems and counterplans in plan of ecological park. Journal of the Industrial Technology Institute, 9, 93-101.
  5. Park, M., Yang, S., Hwang, Y., Seo, H. & Koo, B. (2018). A Basic Study on the Evaluation Index of Village Wetland Ecosystem Services Using Function Evaluation Methods. ournal of the Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology, 21(1), 119-132. https://doi.org/10.13087/kosert.2018.21.1.119
  6. Park, Y., Jeon, S., Um, J., Choe, H. & Byun, B. (2012). Sustainable Use and Management of Protected Areas: Site-Based Approaches Considering Ecological and Socio-Economic Factors. Green Growth Research Report, 2012, 1-302.
  7. Joo, W., Kwon, H. et al. (2017). Establisgment of Ecosystem Services Assessment Framework at National Level, National Institute of Ecology.
  8. Joo, W., Kwon, H. et al. (2017). Assessment of Key Ecosystem Assets and Conservation Strategies, National Institute of Ecology.
  9. KOREA Database on Protected Areas [web]. (2019.12.10.). URL: http://www.kdpa.kr/
  10. Banzhaf, H. S., & Boyd, J. (2012). The architecture and measurement of an ecosystem services index. Sustainability, 4(4), 430-461. https://doi.org/10.3390/su4040430
  11. Chan, K. M., Goldstein, J., Satterfield, T., Hannahs, N., Kikiloi, K., Naidoo, R., ... & Woodside, U. (2011). Cultural services and non-use values. Natural capital: Theory and practice of mapping ecosystem services, 206-228.
  12. CICES[web]. (2019.12.10.). URL: https://cices.eu/resources
  13. Coscieme, L. (2015). Cultural ecosystem services: The inspirational value of ecosystems in popular music. Ecosystem services, 16, 121-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.10.024
  14. Gee, K., & Burkhard, B. (2010). Cultural ecosystem services in the context of offshore wind farming: a case study from the west coast of Schleswig-Holstein. Ecological Complexity, 7(3), 349-358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2010.02.008
  15. Haines-Young, R., Potschin, M., Fish, R., & Somper, C. (2007). The Ecosystem Concept and the Identification of Ecosystem Goods and Services in the English Policy Context-A Review Paper Deliverable 1.3.
  16. Hernandez-Morcillo, M., Plieninger, T., & Bieling, C. (2013). An empirical review of cultural ecosystem service indicators. Ecological indicators, 29, 434-444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.01.013
  17. Kandziora, M., Burkhard, B., & Muller, F. (2013). Interactions of ecosystem properties, ecosystem integrity and ecosystem service indicators-A theoretical matrix exercise. Ecological indicators, 28, 54-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.09.006
  18. Kumar, M., & Kumar, P. (2008). Valuation of the ecosystem services: a psycho-cultural perspective. Ecological economics, 64(4), 808-819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.05.008
  19. MA (2005). Overview of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. UNEP.
  20. Maes, J., Liquete, C., Teller, A., Erhard, M., Paracchini, M. L., Barredo, J. I., ... & Meiner, A. (2016). An indicator framework for assessing ecosystem services in support of the EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020. Ecosystem services, 17, 14-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.10.023
  21. Mononen, L., Auvinen, A. P., Ahokumpu, A. L., Ronka, M., Aarras, N., Tolvanen, H., ... & Vihervaara, P. (2016). National ecosystem service indicators: measures of social-ecological sustainability. Ecological Indicators, 61, 27-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.03.041
  22. Rodrigues, J. M. G. (2015). Cultural services in aquatic ecosystems. In Ecosystem Services and River Basin Ecohydrology (pp. 35-56). Springer, Dordrecht.
  23. Schaich, H., Bieling, C., & Plieninger, T. (2010). Linking ecosystem services with cultural landscape research. Gaia-Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 19(4), 269-277. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.19.4.9
  24. Steinhardt, U., Herzog, F., Lausch, A., Muller, E., & Lehmann, S. (1999). Hemeroby index for landscape monitoring and evaluation. Environmental indices, system analysis approach, 237-254.
  25. Tardieu, L., Roussel, S., & Salles, J. M. (2013). Assessing and mapping global climate regulation service loss induced by Terrestrial Transport Infrastructure construction. Ecosystem Services, 4, 73-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.02.007
  26. TEEB[web]. (2019.12.10.). URL: http://www.teebweb.org/resources/ecosystem-services/
  27. Vejre, H., Jensen, F. S., & Thorsen, B. J. (2010). Demonstrating the importance of intangible ecosystem services from peri-urban landscapes. Ecological complexity, 7(3), 338-348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.09.005
  28. Willemen, L., Verburg, P. H., Hein, L., & van Mensvoort, M. E. (2008). Spatial characterization of landscape functions. Landscape and urban planning, 88(1), 34-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.08.004