DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

생태자연도 등급 하락에 영향을 미치는 인위적 토지피복 변화 분석

The Impact of Anthropogenic Land Cover Change on Degradation of Grade in Ecology and Nature Map

  • 투고 : 2019.10.30
  • 심사 : 2019.12.03
  • 발행 : 2019.12.31

초록

The first grade zones in Ecology and Nature Map are important regions for the conservation of the ecosystem, but it would be degraded by various anthropogenic factors. This study analyzes the relationship between potential land cover change and degradation of the first grade zones using land cover transition probability. As a result, it was shown that most of the first grade zones with degraded were converted from forest to urban(5.1%), cropland(27.2%), barren(11.0%) and grass(27.5%) in Gangwon and forest to urban(18.0%), cropland(15.3%), grass(28.4%), barren(12.3%) in Gyeonggi. The result of the logistic regression analysis showed that the probability of degradation of first grade zone was higher in area where was expected the higher probability of urban, cropland, barren, grass transition. The barren transition probability was the most influential and grass was the next highest. There were regional differences in the probability of urban transition and cropland transition, and the urban transition probability was more influential in Gyeonggi-do. This is because development pressure such as housing site development is high in Gyeonggi-do. Due to the limitations of the Act on Mountain Districts Management, even in the first grade zones, the grade may be degraded. Therefore, if Ecology and Nature Map are used to prevent deforestation or conversion of mountainous districts, it may contribute to the preservation of the ecosystem.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Ahn KW.Shin YK.Kim JY.Lee YK.Lim JC.Ha JW.Kwon HS.Suh JH and Kim MJ. 2015. A review on the public appeals of the ecosystem and nature map. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment. 24(1) : 99-109. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.14249/eia.2015.24.1.99
  2. Araya YH and Cabral P. 2010. Analysis and modeling of urban land cover change in Setubal Sesimbra, Portugal. Remote Sensing. 2(6) : 1549-1563. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs2061549
  3. Eastman JR. 2012. IDRISI-TerrSet. Worcester. MA: Clark University.
  4. Eastman JR. 2016. IDRISI Terrset manual . Worcester. MA: Clark University.
  5. El-Hallaq MA and Habboub MO. 2015. Using cellular automata-markov analysis and multi criteria evaluation for predicting the shape of the Dead Sea. Advances in Remote Sensing. 4(01) : 83-95. https://doi.org/10.4236/ars.2015.41008
  6. ESRI AD. 2011. Release 10.5. Environmental Systems Research Institute. Redlands. CA.
  7. Jin S.Yang L.Danielson P.Homer C.Fry J and Xian G. 2013. A comprehensive change detection method for updating the National Land Cover Database to circa 2011. Remote Sensing of Environment. 132: 159-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2013.01.012
  8. Jung TJ.Song IB.Lee JS.Lee SJ.Cho KJ.Song KH.Kim KD.Cha JY.Cho JS.Leem HS and Joung HJ. 2017. The analysis on causes of areas with public appeals to the ecosystem and nature map. Journal of the Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology. 20(1) : 25-34. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.13087/kosert.2017.20.1.25
  9. KFS. 2019. Statistical yearbook of forestry. Korea Forest Service. (in Korean)
  10. KRIHS. 2005. Policy directions for the efficient management of forestland. Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements. (in Korean)
  11. Kim SJ and Lee YJ. 2007. The effect of spatial scale and resolution in the prediction of future land use using CA-Markov technique. Journal of the Korean Association of Geographic Information Studies. 10(2) : 57-69. (in Korean)
  12. Lee YH and Kim SJ. 2007. A Modified CA-Markov Technique for Prediction of Future Land Use Change. Journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineers D. 27(6D) : 809-817. (in Korean)
  13. Lee DK.Kim JU and Park C. 2010. A prediction of forest vegetation based on land cover change in 2090. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment. 19(2) : 117-125. (in Korean)
  14. Lee DK.Ryu DH.Kim HG and Lee SH. 2011. Analyzing the future land use change and its effects for the region of Yangpyeong-gun and Yeoju-gun in Korea with the Dyna-CLUE Model. Journal of the Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology. 14(6) : 119-130. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.13087/KOSERT.2011.14.6.119
  15. Li X.Lin J.Chen Y.Liu X and Ai B. 2013. Calibrating cellular automata based on landscape metrics by using genetic algorithms. International Journal of Geographical Information Science. 27(3) : 594-613. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2012.698391
  16. Li X and Yeh AGO. 2002. Neural-network-based cellular automata for simulating multiple land use changes using GIS. International Journal of Geographical Information Science. 16(4) : 323-343. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658810210137004
  17. Li X and Yeh AGO. 2004. Data mining of cellular automata's transition rules. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 18(8) : 723-744. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658810410001705325
  18. Mas JF. 1999. Monitoring land-cover changes -a comparison of change detection techniques. International Journal of Remote Sensing. 20(1) : 139-152. https://doi.org/10.1080/014311699213659
  19. NIE. 2018. Research for ecosystem and nature map. National Institute of Ecology. (in Korean)
  20. Oh KY.Lee MJ and No WY. 2016. A study on the improvement of sub-divided land cover map classification system -based on the land cover map by ministry of environment. Korean Journal of Remote Sensing. 32(2) : 105-118. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.7780/kjrs.2016.32.2.4
  21. Park GA and Kim JS. 2007a. Prediction of the urbanization progress using factor analysis and CA-Markov technique. Journal of the Korean Society of Agricultural Engineers. 49(6) : 113-122. (in Korean)
  22. Park SH and Kim JI. 2007b. The characteristics of land use change at the urban fringe. Journal of the Korean Association of Geographic Information Studies. 10(2) : 35-45. (in Korean)
  23. R Core Team. 2018. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna. Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/.
  24. Sang L.Zhang C.Yang J.Zhu D and Yun W. 2011. Simulation of land use spatial pattern of towns and villages based on CA-Markov model. Mathematical and Computer Modeling. 54(3-4) : 938-943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2010.11.019
  25. Sangermano F.Eastman JR and Zhu H. 2010. Similarity weighted instance-based learning for the generation of transition potentials in land use change modeling. Transactions in GIS. 14(5) : 569-580. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9671.2010.01226.x
  26. Seo HJ and Jun BW. 2017. Modeling the spatial dynamics of urban green spaces in Daegu with a CA-Markov model. Journal of the Korean Geographical Society. 52(1) : 123-141. (in Korean)
  27. Singh A. 1989. Review article digital change detection techniques using remotely-sensed data. International Journal of Remote Sensing. 10(6) : 989-1003. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431168908903939
  28. Subedi P.Subedi K and Thapa B. 2013. Application of a hybrid cellular automata-markov(CA-Markov) model in land-use change prediction -a case study of Saddle Creek Drainage basin. Florida. Applied Ecology and Environmental Sciences. 1(6) : 126-132. https://doi.org/10.12691/aees-1-6-5
  29. Weng Q. 2002. Land use change analysis in the Zhujiang Delta of China using satellite remote sensing, GIS and stochastic modelling. Journal of Environmental Management. 64(3) : 273-284. https://doi.org/10.1006/jema.2001.0509