Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society (한국학교수학회논문집)

The Korean School Mathematics Society (한국학교수학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the didactic transposition of the pre-service elementary school teachers for Mathematics instruction

수학수업을 위한 예비초등교사의 교수학적 변환 고찰

  • Received : 2019.11.08
  • Accepted : 2019.12.24
  • Published : 2019.12.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine what aspects of mathematical activities in elementary school mathematics textbooks pre-service school teachers pay attention to in the process of didactic transposition. To do this, the third grade students of the College of Education were asked to analyze the activities of the elementary mathematics textbooks and then select a lesson activities as needed to modify or supplement the activities. As a result of the study, in the process of revising textbook activities for mathematics lessons, pre-service teachers pay attention to whether the textbook activities provide concrete activities, whether they induce student motivation, and whether there is overlap between classes activities. For the didactic transposition of textbook activities for mathematics lessons, pre-service teachers were able to comprehensively utilize relevant curriculum documents such as national curriculum and teachers' manual for checking the goals and achievement standards and lesson objectives.

본 연구는 예비초등교사가 수학수업을 위한 교수학적 변환과정에서 어떤 점에 주목하여 교과서 활동을 분석하는지를 살펴봄으로써 수학수업을 위한 교수학적 변환에서 예비교사가 어떤 점에 주목하는지를 살펴보고자 하였다. 이를 위해, 교육대학교 3학년 학생들에게 초등수학교과서의 활동을 분석한 후 수학수업을 위해 활동을 수정하거나 보완하는 것이 필요한 한 차시를 선택하여 활동을 구안하고 이를 활용한 수업안을 작성하여 실제 수업을 실시한 후 수업 후 협의회를 통해 다시 수정하도록 하였다. 연구결과, 수학수업을 위해 교과서 활동을 변환하는 과정에서 예비교사들은 교과서의 활동이 구체물 활동을 제공하는지의 여부, 학생의 동기를 유발하는지의 여부, 차시별 활동이 중복되는지의 여부 등에 주목하는 것을 알 수 있었다. 수학수업을 위한 교과서 활동의 교수학적 변환을 위해서 예비교사들은 교육과정의 목표 및 성취기준, 교사용지도서의 단원 및 차시목표 등과 같이 관련 교육과정 문서를 종합적으로 활용하고 있음을 알 수 있었다.

Keywords

References

  1. 교육과학기술부 (2009). 고등학교 교육과정 해설. 서울: 교육과학기술부.
  2. 교육과학기술부 (2011). 수학과 교육과정. 교육과학기술부 고시 제2011-361호[별책 8].
  3. 교육부 (2015a). 교사용지도서 수학 5-2. 천재교육.
  4. 교육부 (2015b). 수학과 교육과정. 교육부 고시 제2015-74호[별책 8].
  5. 김민혁 (2013). 수학교사의 교과서 및 교사용 지도서 활용도 조사. 학교수학, 15(3), 503-531.
  6. 방정숙, 권미선, 김정원 (2012). 초등학교 우수 수업 동영상에 나타난 좋은 수학 수업의 특징 분석. 한국초등수학교육학회지, 16(3), 403-426.
  7. 배수경 (2015). 중등 수학 교사의 수학적 지식의 교수학적 변환에 관한 연구. 이화여자대학교 대학원 박사학위 논문.
  8. 윤나미 (1999). Brousseau의 교수학적 상황론의 이해와 적용. 석사학위논문. 이화여자대학교.
  9. 이경화 (2016). 교수학적 변환 연구의 동향과 과제. 수학교육학연구, 26(2), 173-188.
  10. 주형미, 양윤정, 남창우, 이광우 (2014). 2014 KICE 이슈페이퍼: 교과서 완결 학습 구현을 위한 교과용도서 실태 및 요구 분석. 연구자료 ORM 2014-27-24.
  11. Alajmi, A. (2009). Addressing computational estimation in the Kuwaiti curriculum: Teachers' views. Mathematics Teacher Education, 12(4), 263-283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-009-9106-3
  12. Artzt, F., Armour- Thomas, E., Curcio, F. R., & Gurl, T. J. (2015). Becoming a reflective mathematics teacher: a guide for observations and self-assessment(3rd ed.). Routledge.
  13. Bensaude-Vincent, B. (2006). Textbooks on the map of Science studies, Science & Education, 15, 667-670. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-005-1243-1
  14. Bosch, M., & Gascon, J. (2006). Twenty-Five Years of the Didactic Transposition, ICMI Bulletin No.58.
  15. Brousseau, G. (1997). Theory of didactical situations in mathematics. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  16. Brown, C. A., & Baird, J. (1993). Inside the teacher: Knowledge, beliefs, and attitudes. In P. S. Wilson (Ed.), Research ideas for the classroom: High school mathematics (pp. 245-259). New York, NY: Macmillan.
  17. Bush, W.S. (1986). Pre-service teachers' sources of decisions in teaching secondary mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 17 (1), 21-30. https://doi.org/10.2307/749316
  18. Clark, R. E. (2001). Media are "mere vehicles": The opening argument, in R. E. Clark(ed.), Learning with Media, Information Age Publishing, Conneticut, Chapter 1, pp. 1-12.
  19. Fan, L. (2013). Textbook research as scientific research: Towards a common ground on issues and methods of research on mathematics textbooks. ZDM Mathematics Education, 45(5), 765-777. doi:10.1007/s11858-013-0530-6.
  20. Galili, I., & Tseitlin, M. (2003). Newton's first law: Text, translations, interpretations and Physics education, Science & Education, 12, 45-73. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022632600805
  21. Gelfman, E., A. Podstrigich, & R. Losinskaya (2004). On the problem of typology and functions of school texts, Discussion Group 14, Focus on the Development and Research of Mathematics Textbooks. ICME X, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  22. Good, T. L., & Brophy, J. (1995). Contemporary educational psychology. New York, NY: Longman.
  23. Haggarty, L., & Pepin, B. (2002). An investigation of mathematics textbooks and their use in English, French and German classrooms: Who gets an opportunity to learn what? British Educational Research Journal, 28(4), 567-590. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192022000005832
  24. Hiebert, J., & Carpenter, T. P. (1992). Learning and teaching with understanding. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 65-97). New York, NY: Macmillan.
  25. Hirsch, C., Lappan, G., Reys, B., & Reys, R. (2005). Curriculum as a focus for improving school mathematics. Mathematicians and Education Reform Forum Newsletter, 18(1), 1-14.
  26. Johansson, M. (2003). Textbooks in mathematics education. A study of textbooks as the potentially implemented curriculum (Licentiate thesis). Department of Mathematics, Lulea University of Technology.
  27. Johansson, M. (2006). Textbooks as instruments: three teachers' ways to organize their mathematics lessons. Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education, 11 (3), 5-30.
  28. Laborde, C., & Vergnaud, G. (1994). L'apprentissage et l' enseignement des mathematiques. Apprentissages et didactiques, ou en est-on? Hachette, Paris.
  29. Lepik, M., Grevholm, B., & Viholainen, A. (2015). Using textbooks in the mathematics classroom - the teachers' view. Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education. 20. 129- 156.
  30. Lloyd, G. M. (2002). Mathematics teachers' beliefs and experiences with innovative curriculum materials. The role of curriculum in teacher development. In G. C. Leder, E. Pehkonen & G. Torner (Eds.), Beliefs: a hidden variable in mathematics education? (pp. 149-160). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  31. Mesa, V. (2004). Characterizing practices associated with functions in Middle School textbooks: An empirical approach, Educational Studies in Mathematics, 56, 255-286. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDUC.0000040409.63571.56
  32. Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O. & Foy, P. (2008). TIMSS 2007 international mathematics report: findings from IEA's Trends in international mathematics and science study at the fourth and eighth grades. Chestnut Hill: Boston College.
  33. Newton, D. P. (1990). Teaching with Text: Choosing, Preparing and Using Textual Materials forInstruction. Kogan Page, London.
  34. Pepin, B., Gueudet, G. & Trouche, L. (2013). Investigating textbooks as crucial interfaces between culture, policy and teacher curricular practice: two contrasted case studies in France and Norway. ZDM - The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 45, 685-698. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0526-2
  35. Raymond, A. M. (1997). Inconsistency between a beginning elementary school teacher's mathematics beliefs and teaching practice. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28, 550-576. https://doi.org/10.2307/749691
  36. Reys, B. J., Reys, R. E., & Chavez, O. (2004). Why mathematics textbooks matter. Educational Leadership, 61(5), 61-66.
  37. Robitaille, D. F. & Travers, K. J. (1992). International studies of achievement in mathematics. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 687-709). New York: Macmillan.
  38. Schmidt, W. H., McKnight, C. C., Houang, R. T., Wang, H., Wiley, D. E., Cogan, L. S., & Wolfe, R. G. (2001). Why schools matter: A cross-national investigation of curriculum and learning. San Fransisco, CA: Jossie-Bass.
  39. Stein, M., Remillard, J., & Smith, M. (2007). How curriculum influences students' learning. In F. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 557-628). Charlotte, FL: Information Age.
  40. Stein, M.. K., Smith, M. S., Henningsen, M. A. & Silver, E. A. (2009). Implementing Standards-based Mathematics Instructions: A casebook for professional development(2nd ed.). Teachers College Press.
  41. Swanepoel, S. (2010). The assessment of the quality of science education textbooks: conceptual framework and instruments for analysis(Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of South Africa, South Africa.
  42. Thompson, D. R. & Senk, S. L. (2014). The same geometry textbook does not mean the same classroom enactment. ZDM - The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 46, 781-795. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-014-0622-y
  43. Tornroos, J. (2005). Mathematics textbooks, opportunity to learn and student achievement. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 31(4), 315-327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2005.11.005
  44. Tyson-Bernstein, H. & Woodward, A. (1991). Nineteenth century policies for twenty-first century practice: the textbook reform dilemma. In P. Altbach, G. Kelly, H. Petrie & L. Weis (Eds.), Textbooks in American society, (pp. 91-104). Albany: SUNY Press.
  45. Valverde, G. A., Bianchi, L. J., Wolfe, R. G., Schmidt, W. H. & Houang, R. T. (2002). According to the book. Using TIMSS to investigate the translation of policy into practice through the world of textbooks. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  46. Wijaya, A., Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., & Doorman, M. (2015). Opportunity-to-learncontext-based tasks provided by mathematics textbooks. Educational studies in Mathematics, 89, 41-65. doi:10.1007/s10649-015- 9595-1.
  47. Xin, Y. P. (2007). Word problem solving tasks in textbooks and their relation to student performance. Journal of Educational Research, 100(6), 347-359. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.100.6.347-360