DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Development of a Teaching-learning Model for Active Learning in Engineering Education

공학교육에서의 Active Learning 교수-학습 모형 개발 연구

  • Kim, Na-Young (Institute For Education Innovation, Korea Polytechnic University) ;
  • Kang, Donghee (Institute For Education Innovation, Korea Polytechnic University)
  • 김나영 (한국산업기술대학교 교육혁신원) ;
  • 강동희 (한국산업기술대학교 교육혁신원)
  • Received : 2019.08.23
  • Accepted : 2019.11.19
  • Published : 2019.11.30

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to development of a teaching-learning model for active learning in engineering education. For this, the adequacy between educational objectives and active learning activities is verified and furthermore an "active learning teaching-learning model" is suggested. This suggested teaching-learning model is expected to supplement weakness of traditional lecture-type teaching-learning activity. Based on the literature review, first, the representative activities of active learning were derived. there are twenty active learning activities, which compose of five of individual learning activity, five of pair-learning activity and five of group-learning activity, and five of alternative- learning activity. In addition, a survey on adequacy between designed active learning activities and learning outcomes were conducted to ten educational experts. Lawshe's content validity calculation method was applied to analyze the validity of this study. Second, five teaching-learning principles, such as thinking, interaction, expression, reflection, and evaluation were derived to develop an "active learning teaching-learning model" which supplements lecture-type classes and then the "TIERA teaching-learning model" which consists of five stages was designed. Finally, based on the survey on educational experts, adequate active learning activities were proposed to apply in each stage of the "TIERA teaching-learning model" and as a result the TIERA model's active learning activities were developed. The result of this study shows that some activities of active learning are appropriate to induce high cognitive learning skills from the learners even in traditional lecture-type classrooms and therefore this study suggests meaningful direction to new paradigm of teaching-learning for engineering education. This study also suggests that instructors of engineering education can turn their traditional teaching-learning activities into dynamic learning activities by utilizing "active learning teaching-learning model".

Keywords

References

  1. 권성호.신동욱.강경희(2008). 해외 공학교육 사례분석을 통한 교수학습 전략 탐색. 공학교육연구, 11(3), 12-23. https://doi.org/10.18108/JEER.2008.11.3.12
  2. 백영균 외(2015). 스마트 시대의 교육방법 및 교육공학. 학지사.
  3. 현대경제연구원(2016). 4차 산업혁명의 등장과 시사점. 경제주평, 216(32).
  4. Astin, A.(1993). What matters in college? Four critical years revisited. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  5. Bonwell, C. C. & Eison, J. A.(1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. 1991 ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports.
  6. Bullard, L., Felder, R., & Raubenheimer D.(2008). Effects of active learning on student performance and retention. Paper presented at the 2008 American Society for Engineering Education Conference and Exposition.
  7. Crimmins, M. T. & Midkiff, B.(2017). High structure active learning pedagogy for the teaching of organic chemistry: assessing the impact on academic outcomes. Journal of Chemical Education, 94, 429-438. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00663
  8. Dewey, J.(1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Boston, MA: D. C. Heath and Co Publishers.
  9. Faust, J. L. & Paulson, D. R.(1998). Active learning in the college classroom. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 9(2), 3-24.
  10. Freeman, S. et al.(2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410-8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
  11. Holley, E. A.(2017). Engaging engineering students in geoscience through case studies and active learning. Journal of Geoscience Education, 65, 240-249. https://doi.org/10.5408/16-145.1
  12. Hyun, J., Ediger, R.. & Lee, D.(2017). Students' Satisfaction on their Learning process in active learning and traditional classrooms. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 29(1), 108-118.
  13. Kolb, D. A.(1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
  14. Lawshe, C. H.(1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563-575. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x
  15. Lima, R. M., Andersson, P. H., & Saalman, E.(2017). Active learning in engineering education: a (re)introduction. European Journal of Engineering Education, 42(1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2016.1254161
  16. LoPresto, M. C. & Slater, T. F.(2016). A new comparison of active learning strategies to traditional lectures for teaching college astronomy. Journal of Astronomy & Earth Science Education, 3(1), 59-76.
  17. OECD(2017). Education at a glance: OECD indicators. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/education-at-a-glance-2017_eag-2017-en
  18. Prince, M.(2004). Does active learning work? a review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93, 223-231. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x
  19. Prince, M. & Felder, R.(2007). Too many faces of inductive teaching and learning. Journal of College Science Teaching, 36(5), 14-20.
  20. Riley, J. & Ward, K.(2017). Active learning, cooperative active learning, and passive learning methods in an accounting information system course. Issues in Accounting Education, 32(2), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.2308/iace-51366
  21. Shambhavi, B. R.(2016). Effective collaborative activities and active learning in engineering education: a case study. Paper presented at the 2016 IEEE 4th International Conference on MOOCs, Innovation and Technology in Education.