DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Full-scale investigations into installation damage of nonwoven geotextiles

  • Received : 2017.06.13
  • Accepted : 2018.12.11
  • Published : 2019.01.20

Abstract

Due to the importance of soil reinforcement using geotextiles in geotechnical engineering, study and investigation into long-term performance, design life and survivability of geotextiles, especially due to installation damage are necessary and will affect their economy. During installation, spreading and compaction of backfill materials, geotextiles may encounter severe stresses which can be higher than they will experience in-service. This paper aims to investigate the installation damage of geotextiles, in order to obtain a good approach to the estimation of the material's strength reduction factor. A series of full-scale tests were conducted to simulate the installation process. The study includes four deliberately poorly-graded backfill materials, two kinds of subgrades with different CBR values, three nonwoven needle-punched geotextiles of classes 1, 2 and 3 (according to AASHTO M288-08) and two different relative densities for the backfill materials. Also, to determine how well or how poorly the geotextiles tolerated the imposed construction stresses, grab tensile tests and visual inspections were carried out on geotextile specimens (before and after installation). Visual inspections of the geotextiles revealed sedimentation of fine-grained particles in all specimens and local stretching of geotextiles by larger soil particles which exerted some damage. A regression model is proposed to reliably predict the installation damage reduction factor. The results, obtained by grab tensile tests and via the proposed models, indicated that the strength reduction factor due to installation damage was reduced as the median grain size and relative density of the backfill decreases, stress transferred to the geotextiles' level decreases and as the as-received grab tensile strength of geotextile and the subgrades' CBR value increase.

Keywords

References

  1. AASHTO M288-08 (2008), Standard Specification for Geotextile Specification for Highway Applications, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Virginia, U.S.A.
  2. Allen, T.M. and Bathurst, R.J. (1994), "Characterization of geosynthetic load-strain behavior after installation damage", Geosynth. Int., 1(2), 181-199. https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.1.0008
  3. ASTM D 1556-08 (2008), Standard Test Method for Density and Unit Weight of Soil in Place by Sand-Cone Method, American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.
  4. ASTM D 5261-10 (2010), Standard Test Method for Measuring Mass per Unit Area of Geotextiles, American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.
  5. ASTM D 5821-13 (2013), Standard Test Method for Determining the Percentage of Fractured Particles in Coarse Aggregate, American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.
  6. ASTM D 6241-14 (2014), Standard Test Method for Static Puncture Strength of Geotextiles and Geotextile-Related Products Using a 50-mm Probe, American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.
  7. ASTM D4533-15 (2015), Standard Test Method for Trapezoidal Tearing strength of Geotextiles, 15American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.
  8. ASTM D4632-15 (2015), Standard Test Method for Grab Breaking Load and Elongation of Geotextiles, American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.
  9. ASTM D5818 (2000), Obtaining Samples of Geosynthetics from a Test Section for Assessment of Installation Damage, American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.
  10. Bathurst, R.J., Huang, B. and Allen, T.M. (2011), Analysis of installation damage tests for LRFD calibration of reinforced soil structures, Geotext. Geomembr., 29(3), 323-334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2010.10.003
  11. Berg, R.R, Christopher, B.R. and Samtani, N.C. (2009), Design of Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls and Reinforced Soil Slopes, FHWA NHI-10-024, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, U.S.A.
  12. Carlos, D.M., Pinho-Lopes, M., Carneiro, J.R. and Lopes, M.L. (2015), "Effect of soil grain size distribution on the mechanical damage of nonwoven geotextiles under repeated loading", Int. J. Geosynth. Ground Eng., 1(1), 1-9.
  13. Costa, C.M.L., Zornberg, J.G., Boeno, B.D.C. and Costa, Y.D.J. (2016), "Centrifuge evaluation of the time-dependent behavior of geotextile-reinforced soil walls", Geotext. Geomembr., 44(2), 188-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2015.09.001
  14. Deb, K. and Konai, S. (2014), "Bearing capacity of geotextilereinforced sand with varying fine fraction", Geomech. Eng., 6(1), 33-45. https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2014.6.1.033
  15. Elias, V. (2001), Corrosion/Degradation of Soil Reinforcements for Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls and Reinforced Soil Slopes, FHWA-NHI-00-044, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, U.S.A.
  16. Elvidge, C.B. and Raymond, G.P. (1999), "Laboratory survivability of nonwoven geotextiles on open-graded crushed aggregate", Geosynth. Int., 6(2), 93-117. https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.6.0145
  17. FHWA-HI-95-038 (1998), Geosynthetic Design and Construction Guidelines, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, U.S.A.
  18. Greenwood, J.H. and Brady, K.C. (1992), "Geotextiles in aggressive soils", Construct. Build. Mater., 6(1), 15-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/0950-0618(92)90022-Q
  19. Hosseinpour, I., Almeida, M.S.S. and Riccio, M. (2015), " Fullscale load test and finite-element analysis of soft ground improved by geotextile-encased granular columns", Geosynth. Int., 22(6), 428-438. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgein.15.00023
  20. Hufenus, R., Ruegger, R., Flum, D. and Sterba, I.J. (2005), "Strength reduction factors due to installation damage of reinforcing geosynthetics", Geotext. Geomembranes, 23(5), 401-424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2005.02.003
  21. Kim, H.J., Won, M.S., Lee, J.B., Joo, J.H. and Jamin, J.C. (2015), "Comparative study on the behavior of soil fills on rigid acrylic and flexible geotextile containers", Geomech. Eng., 9(2), 243-259. https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2015.9.2.243
  22. Koerner, G.R. and Koerner, R.M. (1990), "The installation survivability of geotextiles and geogrids", Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Geotextiles, Geomembranes and Related Products, The Hague, The Netherlands May-June.
  23. Mendes, M.J.A., Palmeira, E.M. and Matheus, E. (2007), "Some factors affecting the in-soil load-strain behaviour of virgin and damaged nonwoven geotextiles", Geosynth. Int., 14(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.2007.14.1.39
  24. Naeini, S.A. and Gholampoor, N. (2014), "Cyclic behaviour of dry silty sand reinforced with a geotextile", Geotext. Geomembranes, 42(6), 611-619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2014.10.003
  25. Nikbakht, M. and Diederich, R. (2008), "The energy potential and its integration in the national European specification", Found. Civ. Environ. Eng., (11), 41-53.
  26. Pinho-Lopes, M. and Lopes, M.L. (2013), "Tensile properties of geosynthetics after installation damage", Environ. Geotech., 1(3), 161-178. https://doi.org/10.1680/envgeo.13.00032
  27. Portelinha, F.H.M, Bueno, B.S. and Zornberg, J.G. (2013), "Performance of nonwoven geotextile-reinforced walls under wetting conditions: Laboratory and field investigations", Geosynth. Int., 20(2), 90-104. https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.13.00004
  28. Portelinha, F.H.M., Zornberg, J.G. and Pimentel, V. (2014), "Field performance of retaining walls reinforced with woven and nonwoven geotextiles", Geosynth. Int., 21(4), 270-284. https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.14.00014
  29. Richardson, G.N. (1998), "Field evaluation of geosynthetic survivability in aggregate road base", Geotechnical Fabrics Report, 16, 34-38.
  30. Rosete, A., Lopes, P.M., Pinho-Lopes, M. and Lopes, M.L. (2013), "Tensile and hydraulic properties of geosynthetics after mechanical damage and abration laboratory tests", Geosynth. Int., 20 (5), 358-374. https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.13.00022
  31. Tandel, K.Y., Solanki, C.H. and Desai A.K. (2014), "Field behaviour geotextile reinforced sand column", Geomech. Eng., 6(2), 195-211. https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2014.6.2.195
  32. Tavakoli Mehrjardi, Gh. and Amjadi Sardehaei, E., (2017). "Design graphs to estimate reduction factor of nonwoven geotextiles due to installation process", Eur. J. Environ. Civ. Eng., 1-14.
  33. Tavakoli Mehrjardi, Gh., Ghanbari, A. and Mehdizadeh, H. (2016), "Experimental study on the behaviour of geogridreinforced slopes with respect to aggregate size", Geotext. Geomembranes, 44(6), 862-871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2016.06.006
  34. Tavakoli Mehrjardi, Gh., Moghaddas Tafreshi, S.N. and Dawson, A.R. (2013), "Pipe response in a geocell reinforced trench and compaction considerations", Geosynth. Int., 20(2), 105-118. https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.13.00005
  35. Vieira, C.S. and Pereira, P.M. (2015), "Damage induced by recycled construction and demolition wastes on the short-term tensile behaviour of two geosynthetics", Transport. Geotech., 4(September), 64-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2015.07.002
  36. Vieira, C.S., Lopes , M.D.L. and Caldeira, L. (2015), "Sand-Nonwoven geotextile interfaces shear strength by direct shear and simple shear tests", Geomech. Eng., 9(5), 601-618. https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2015.9.5.601
  37. Wang, L., Zhang, G. and Zhang, J.M. (2011), "Centrifuge model tests of geotextile-reinforced soil embankments during an earthquake", Geotext. Geomembr., 29(3), 222-232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2010.11.002
  38. Watn, A., Eiksund, G. and Knutson, A. (1998), "Deformation and damage of nonwoven geotextiles in road construction", Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Geosynthetics, Atlanta, Georgia, U.S.A., March.
  39. Watts, G.R.A. and Brady, K.C. (1994), "Geosynthetics-installation damage and the measurement of tensile strength", Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Geotextiles, Geomembranes and Related Products, Singapore, September.
  40. WSDOT T925 (2005), Standard Practice for Determination of Long-Term Strength for Geosynthetic Reinforcement, Washington State Department of Transportation, Olympia, Washington, U.S.A.