한국컴퓨터정보학회논문지 (Journal of the Korea Society of Computer and Information)

  • 제24권1호
  • /
  • Pages.197-206
  • /
  • 2019
  • /
  • 1598-849X(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2383-9945(eISSN)
한국컴퓨터정보학회 (Korean Society of Computer Information)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Validation of a Diagnostic Model for Core Competencies at the Higher Education Institute in Korea

  • Kim, Sung-Wan (Institute for Educational Innovation, Korea Nazarene University)
  • 투고 : 2018.10.31
  • 심사 : 2018.12.13
  • 발행 : 2019.01.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The purpose of this study is to develop and validate a model for diagnosing core competencies at the higher education level. Based on literature reviews, a potential model for core competencies at university was suggested. A tool for validating the model was composed of 24 items, which were delivered to 226 professors and administrative staffs, 730 students, and 134 graduates & external industrial experts. Five constructs (core competencies) were extracted from the data collected among professors and administrative staff responding to the importance of the items. The results of importance and performance surveys on core competencies with students were respectively 3.28 to 3.66 and 2.68 to 3.28 (4-point Likert scale). Statistical differences between importance level and performance level were found in all the sub-categories of core competencies. Borich priority determination formula and Locus for Focus Model were used for the determination of the priority of needs. Importance survey among graduates and external experts showed that the mean of each items ranged from 2.80 to 3.76 (4-point Likert scale). The overall results of the analyses suggest that the final model is appropriate for measuring the core competencies.

키워드

CPTSCQ_2019_v24n1_197_f0001.png 이미지

Fig. 1 Potential model of core competencies at a higher education institute

CPTSCQ_2019_v24n1_197_f0002.png 이미지

Fig. 2 Final Revised Model for Core Competencies inHigher Education

CPTSCQ_2019_v24n1_197_f0003.png 이미지

Fig. 3. Priority determination of students' practical skills by analyzing Locus for Focus Model

Table 1. Models of Core Competencies in Higher Education

CPTSCQ_2019_v24n1_197_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. Questionnaire Participants Information

CPTSCQ_2019_v24n1_197_t0002.png 이미지

Table 3. Evaluation items by core competency and practical ability

CPTSCQ_2019_v24n1_197_t0003.png 이미지

Table 4. Mean and Standard Deviation for Items

CPTSCQ_2019_v24n1_197_t0004.png 이미지

Table 5. Relative Importance and Explanation Ratios by Factor

CPTSCQ_2019_v24n1_197_t0005.png 이미지

Table 6. Result of Factor Analysis for 5-Factor Model (Model I)

CPTSCQ_2019_v24n1_197_t0006.png 이미지

Table 7. Result of Factor Analysis for 2-Factor Model (Model II)

CPTSCQ_2019_v24n1_197_t0007.png 이미지

Table 8. Result of Factor Analysis for 2-Factor Model (Model III)

CPTSCQ_2019_v24n1_197_t0008.png 이미지

Table 9. Result of Factor Analysis for 2-Factor Model (Model IV)

CPTSCQ_2019_v24n1_197_t0009.png 이미지

Table 10. Result of Factor Analysis for 2-Factor Model (Model V)

CPTSCQ_2019_v24n1_197_t0010.png 이미지

Table 11. Result of Factor Analysis for 3-Factor Model (Model Ⅵ)

CPTSCQ_2019_v24n1_197_t0011.png 이미지

Table 12. Difference of importance-performance and prioritization of core competencies.

CPTSCQ_2019_v24n1_197_t0012.png 이미지

Table 13. Prioritization of practical skills

CPTSCQ_2019_v24n1_197_t0013.png 이미지

Table 14. Mean and Standard Deviation of importance evaluation by graduates and external experts

CPTSCQ_2019_v24n1_197_t0014.png 이미지

참고문헌

  1. J.Y. Park, D.H., Yun, H.S., Yun, S.A. Oh, The Development of Core Competence Model and Educational Needs for Adult University Students. The Korea Educational Review, Vol 20, No 3, pp. 121-158, 2014.
  2. H.J. Kim,, J.M. Eom, Advancing 21st century competencies in South Korea. Center for Global Education, Asia Society, 2017.
  3. O. Zlatkin-Troitschaskaia, R.J. Shavelson, C. Kuhn, C., The international state of research on measurement of competency in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, Vol 40, pp. 393-411, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1004241
  4. H.J.Lee, Who gets A+ at Seoul National University? Seoul: Dasan Edu, 2014.
  5. F.D. Deist, J. Winterton, What Is Competence? Human Resource Development International, Vol 8, No 1, pp. 27-46, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1080/1367886042000338227
  6. B.Y. Park, A Study on the Concept and the Pedagogical Meaning of the Competency-based Dental Education : Based on the Competency Profile of ADEA(American Dental Education Association). Journal of Vocational Education & Training, Vol 11, No 1, pp. 215-235, 2008
  7. H.R.,Noh, M.N. Choi, The Development of the Teaching Competency Model for HRD. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, Vol l7, No 2, pp.1-28, 2004.
  8. D. Kim, H.S. Ok, Y.S. Song, E.Y. Koh, S.M.Park, E.H. Jung, Exploring students' core competencies in higher education from professors' perspectives: A case study of Seoul National University(SNU). Asian Journal of Education, Vol 10, No 2, pp.195-214, 2009.
  9. R. J. Shavelson, On an approach to testing and modeling competence. Educational Psychologist, Vol 48, No 2, pp.73 -86, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2013.779483
  10. O. Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, H. A. Pant, C. Kuhn, M. Toepper, C. Lautenbach, Messung akademisch vermittelter Kompetenzen von Studierenden und Hochschulabsolventen-Ein Uberblick zum nationalen und internationalen Forschungs-stand [Assessing academically taught competencies of higher education students and 263 Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia and Pant graduates-An overview of the state of national and international research]. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2016.
  11. O. Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, H. A. Pant,Measurement Advances and Challenges in Competency Assessment in Higher Education. Journal of Educational Measurement, Vol 53, No 3, 253-264. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1111/jedm.12118
  12. OECD, The definition and selection of key competencies: Executive summary, 2005. Retrieved April 12, 2016, from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/35070367.pdf.,
  13. B.Trilling, C. Fadel, 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. CA, San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2009.
  14. The Partnership for 21st Century Skills, P21 framework definitions, 2005. http://www.p21.org/storage/documents/docs/P21_framework_0116.pdf
  15. OECD, Testing student and university performance globally: OECD's AHELO, 2011. Retrieved April 12, 2016, from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/35070367.pdf.
  16. D.Ely, The diffusion and implementation of educational technology in developing nations: Cross-cultural comparisons of Indonesia, Chile, and Peru. Instructional Development, Vol 1, No 1, pp.9-12 (ED 331 469), 1990.