Steel and Composite Structures

  • 제30권2호
  • /
  • Pages.81-96
  • /
  • 2019
  • /
  • 1229-9367(pISSN)
  • /
  • 1598-6233(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Behavior of three-tube buckling-restrained brace with circumference pre-stress in core tube

  • Li, Yang (Civil Engineering College of Shandong University) ;
  • Qu, Haiyan (Technical Center of Zhongnan Building Industry Group) ;
  • Xiao, Shaowen (Civil Engineering College of Shandong University) ;
  • Wang, Peijun (Civil Engineering College of Shandong University) ;
  • You, Yang (Civil Engineering College of Shandong University) ;
  • Hu, Shuqing (Technical Center of Zhongtong Steel Construction Co., Ltd.)
  • 투고 : 2018.03.18
  • 심사 : 2019.01.15
  • 발행 : 2019.01.25
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The behavior of a new Three-Tube Buckling-Restrained Brace (TTBRB) with circumference pre-stress (${\sigma}_{{\theta},pre}$) in core tube are investigated through a verified finite element model. The TTBRB is composed of one core tube and two restraining tubes. The core tube is in the middle to provide the axial stiffness, to carry the axial load and to dissipate the earthquake energy. The two restraining tubes are at inside and outside of the core tube, respectively, to restrain the global and local buckling of the core tube. Based on the yield criteria of fringe fiber, a design method for restraining tubes is proposed. The applicability of the proposed design equations are verified by TTBRBs with different radius-thickness ratios, with different gap widths between core tube and restraining tubs, and with different levels of ${\sigma}_{{\theta},pre}$. The outer and inner tubes will restrain the deformation of the core tube in radius direction, which causes circumference stress (${\sigma}_{\theta}$) in the core tube. Together with the ${\sigma}_{{\theta},pre}$ in the core tube that is applied through interference fit of the three tubes, the yield strength of the core tube in the axial direction is improved from 160 MPa to 235 MPa. Effects of gap width between the core tube and restraining tubes, and ${\sigma}_{{\theta},pre}$ on hysteretic behavior of TTBRBs are presented. Analysis results showed that the gap width and the ${\sigma}_{{\theta},pre}$ can significantly affect the hysteretic behavior of a TTBRB.

키워드

과제정보

연구 과제 주관 기관 : National Natural Science Foundation of China

참고문헌

  1. Atlayan, Q. and Charney, A.F. (2014), "Hybrid buckling-restrained braced frames", J. Constr. Steel Res., 96(1), 95-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2014.01.001
  2. Chen, Q., Wang, C.L., Meng, S. and Zeng, B. (2016), "Effect of the un-bonding materials on the mechanic behavior of all-steel buckling-restrained braces", Eng. Struct., 111(4), 478-493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.12.030
  3. Chou, C.C., Chung, P.T. and Cheng, Y.T. (2016), "Experimental evaluation of large-scale dual-core self-centering braces and sandwiched buckling-restrained braces", Eng. Struct., 116(1), 12-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.02.030
  4. Dongbin, Z., Xin, N., Peng, P., Mengzi, W., Kailai, D. and Yabin, C. (2016), "Experimental study and finite element analysis of a buckling-restrained brace consisting of three steel tubes with slotted holes in the middle tube", J. Constr. Steel Res., 124(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2016.05.003
  5. Ghowsi, A.F. and Sahoo, D.R. (2015), "Fragility assessment of buckling-restrained braced frames under near-field earthquakes", Steel Compos. Struct., Int. J., 19(1), 173-190. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2015.19.1.173
  6. Guerrero, H., Ji, T., Escobar, J.A. and Teran-Gilmore, A. (2018), "Effects of Buckling-Restrained Braces on reinforced concrete precast models subjected to shaking table excitation", Eng. Struct., 163(1), 294-310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.02.055
  7. Heidary-Torkamani, H. and Maalek, S. (2017), "Conceptual numerical investigation of all-steel Tube-in-Tube buckling restrained braces", J. Constr. Steel Res., 139(1), 220-235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2017.09.022
  8. Hosseinzadeh, S.H. and Mohebi, B. (2016), "Seismic evaluation of all-steel buckling restrained braces using finite element analysis", J. Constr. Steel Res., 119(1), 76-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2015.12.014
  9. Hoveidae, N., Tremblay, R., Rafezy, B. and Davaran, A. (2015), "Numerical investigation of seismic behavior of short-core allsteel buckling restrained braces", J. Constr. Steel Res., 114(1), 88-99.
  10. Judd, J.P., Marinovic, I., Eatherton, M.R., Hyder, C., Phillips, A.R., Tola, A.T. and Charney, F.A. (2016), "Cyclic tests of allsteel web-restrained buckling-restrained brace subassemblages", J. Constr. Steel Res., 125(1), 164-172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2016.06.007
  11. Kim, S.H. and Choi, S.M. (2015), "Structural behavior of inverted V-braced frames reinforced with non-welded buckling restrained braces", Steel Compos. Struct., Int. J., 19(6), 1581-1598. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2015.19.6.1581
  12. Mirtaheri, S.M., Nazeryan, M., Bahrani, M.K., Nooralizadeh, A., Montazerian, L. and Naserifard, M. (2017), "Local and global buckling condition of all-steel buckling restrained braces", Steel Compos. Struct., Int. J., 23(2), 217-228. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2017.23.2.217
  13. Momenzadeh, S., Seker, O., Faytarouni, M. and Shen, J. (2017), "Seismic performance of all-steel buckling-controlled braces with various cross-sections", J. Constr. Steel Res., 139(1), 44-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2017.09.003
  14. Ozcelik, R., Dikiciasik, Y. and Erdil, E.F. (2017), "The development of the buckling restrained braces with new end restrains", J. Constr. Steel Res., 138(1), 208-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2017.07.008
  15. Piedrafita, D., Cahis, X., Simon, E. and Comas, J. (2015), "A new perforated core buckling restrained brace", Eng. Struct., 85(1), 118-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.12.020
  16. Speicher, M.S. and Harris, J.L. (2018), "Collapse Prevention seismic performance assessment of new buckling-restrained braced frames using ASCE 41", Eng. Struct., 164(1), 274-289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.01.067
  17. Sutcu, F., Takeuchi, T. and Matsui, R. (2014), "Seismic retrofit design method for RC buildings using buckling-restrained braces and steel frames", J. Constr. Steel Res., 101(10), 304-313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2014.05.023
  18. Takahashi, S. and Mochizuki, N. (1979), "Experimental study on buckling of un-bonded braces under axial compressive force: part 1. Summaries of technical papers of annual meeting", Japan: Arch. Inst. Japan, pp. 1623-1626.
  19. Tremblay, R., Bolduc, P., Neville, R. and DeVall, R (2006), "Seismic testing and performance of buckling restrained bracing systems", Can. J. Civil Eng., 33(1), 183-198. https://doi.org/10.1139/l05-103
  20. Zhang, D., Nie, X., Pan, P., Wang, M., Deng, K. and Chen, Y. (2016), "Experimental study and finite element analysis of a buckling-restrained brace consisting of three steel tubes with slotted holes in the middle tube", J. Constr. Steel Res., 124(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2016.05.003