DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of Serum and Serum Free Media on the Developmental Competence of OPU Derived Bovine IVP Embryo

  • Choi, Byung-Hyun (Division of Applied Life Science (BK21 Plus), Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Park, Bun-Young (GAST, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Kong, Rami (Division of Applied Life Science (BK21 Plus), Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Son, Mi-Ju (GAST, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Park, Chan-Sang (Division of Applied Life Science (BK21 Plus), Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Shin, Nyeon-Hak (Gyeongnam-do Provincial Government Livestock Research Institute) ;
  • Cheon, Hye-Young (Gyeongnam-do Provincial Government Livestock Research Institute) ;
  • Yang, Yeong-Rok (Gyeongnam-do Provincial Government Livestock Research Institute) ;
  • Lee, Jin-Woo (Gyeongnam-do Provincial Government Livestock Research Institute) ;
  • Jin, Jong-In (Institute of Agriculture and Life Science, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Kong, Il-Keun (Division of Applied Life Science (BK21 Plus), Gyeongsang National University)
  • Received : 2019.12.04
  • Accepted : 2019.12.07
  • Published : 2019.12.31

Abstract

Embryos produced with serum show the alterations in their ultrastructure, impaired compaction, abnormal blastulation, aberrant mRNA expression profiles and large calf syndrome with greater incidences of stillbirths and deaths after birth. The aim of the present study was to describe in vitro embryo production by analyzing embryo production, fetal production and pregnancy rate in free-serum medium. The OPU-IVP data used in this study from 2016. Approximately, sixteen cows (Hanwoo), which belonged to the Institute of Gyeongsang National University, were used. Two experimental group is used in this study. Serum groups were conducted in March to July and free-serum group was conducted in September to December. The recovered cumulus-oocyte complexes were morphologically classified to four grades based on the compaction of cumulus cells layers and homogeneity of the cytoplasm. The number of oocyte was significantly greater in serum groups than that in free-serum groups (29.61 ± 0.63 vs. 15.6 ± 0.62; p < 0.05). Between serum and free-serum groups indicate that average of 1st and 2nd grade oocytes were no difference (2.38 ± 1.67 vs. 2.38 ± 1.48; p > 0.05), but number of 3rd and 4th grade oocytes were greater in serum groups than that in free-serum groups (7.31 ± 7.64 vs. 5.60 ± 6.29; p < 0.05). Embryo cleaved competence was higher in rate in free-serum groups than that in serum groups (62.1% vs. 58.3; p < 0.05). However, blastocyst developmental rate was no difference between serum and free-serum groups (33.1% vs. 43.5%; p < 0.05). 986 recipients were used for embryo transfer. Pregnancy rate was indicated that between serum and free-serum group was no difference (54.6% vs. 56.3%; p < 0.05). In conclusion, we developed the free-serum system for production of in vitro bovine embryos in order to meet the developmental and qualitative requirements for large scale commercial use.

Keywords

References

  1. Abe H, Hoshi H. 2003. Evaluation of bovine embryos produced in high performance serum-free media. J. Reprod. Dev. 49:193-202. https://doi.org/10.1262/jrd.49.193
  2. Abe H, Yamashita S, Itoh T, Satoh T, Hoshi H. 1999. Histochemical and ultrastructural evaluations of cytoplasmic lipid droplets in bovine embryos cultured in serum-free and serum-containing media. Theriogenology 51:232. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(99)91791-0
  3. Abe H, Yamashita S, Satoh T, Hoshi H. 2002. Accumulation of cytoplasmic lipid droplets in bovine embryos and cryotolerance of embryos developed in different culture systems using serumfree or serum-containing media. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 61:57-66. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.1131
  4. Bavister BD. 1995. Culture of preimplantation embryos: facts and artifacts. Hum. Reprod. Update. 1:91-148. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/1.2.91
  5. Crosier AE, Farin PW, Dykstra MJ, Alexander JE, Farin CE. 2001. Ultrastructural morphometry of bovine blastocysts produced in vivo or in vitro. Biol. Reprod. 64:1375-1385. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod64.5.1375
  6. Donnay I, Van Langendonckt A, Auquier P, Grisart B, Vansteenbrugge A, Massip A, et al. 1997. Effects of co-culture and embryo number on the in vitro development of bovine embryos. Theriogenology 47:1549-1561. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(97)00160-X
  7. Farin PW, Crosier AE, Farin CE. 2001. Influence of in vitro systems on embryo survival and fetal development in cattle. Theriogenology 55:151-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0093-691x(00)00452-0
  8. Galli C, Crotti G, Notari C, Turini P, Duchi R and Lazzari G. 2001. Embryo production by ovum pick up from live donors. Theriogenology 55:1341-1357. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(01)00486-1
  9. Goto K, Kajihara Y, Kosaka S, Koba M, Nakanishi Y, Ogawa K. 1988. Pregnancies after co-culture of cumulus cells with bovine embryos derived from in-vitro fertilization of in-vitro matured follicular oocytes. J. Reprod. Fertil. 83:753-758. https://doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.0830753
  10. Holm P, Booth PJ, Schmidt MH, Greve T, Callesen H. 1999. High bovine blastocyst development in a static in vitro production system using SOFaa medium supplemented with sodium citrate and myo-inositol with or without serum-proteins. Theriogenology 52:683-700. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(99)00162-4
  11. Jacobsen H, Schmidt M, Holm P, Sangild PT, Vajta G, Greve T, et al. 2000. Body dimensions and birth and organ weights of calves derived from in vitro produced embryos cultured with or without serum and oviduct epithelium cells. Theriogenology 53:1761-1769. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(00)00312-5
  12. Jin JI, Choi BH, Kim SS, Park BY, Lee JG and Kong IK. 2015. Possibility of Repeated Use of Elite Donor Cows for Mass Production of OPU-Derived Embryos. J. Emb. Trans. 30:149-159. https://doi.org/10.12750/JET.2015.30.3.149
  13. Lane M, Gardner DK. 2007. Embryo culture medium: which is the best? Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 21:83-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2006.09.009
  14. Lonergan P, O'Kearney-Flynn M, Boland MP. 1999. Effect of protein supplementation and presence of an antioxidant on the development of bovine zygotes in synthetic oviduct fluid medium under high or low oxygen tension. Theriogenology 51:1565-1576. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(99)00099-0
  15. Lonergan P, Rizos D, Gutierrez-Adan A, Moreira MB, Pintado B, de la Fuente J. 2003. Temporal divergence in the pattern of messenger RNA expression in bovine embryos cultured from the zygote to blastocyst stage in vitro or in vivo. Biol. Reprod. 69:1424-1431. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.103.018168
  16. Lonergan P, Rizos D, Ward F, Boland MP. 2001. Factors influencing oocyte and embryo quality in cattle. Reprod. Nutr. Dev. 41:427-437. https://doi.org/10.1051/rnd:2001142
  17. Lu KH, Gordon I, Gallagher M, McGovern H. 1987. Pregnancy established in cattle by transfer of embryos derived from in vitro fertilisation of oocytes matured in vitro. Vet. Rec. 121:259-260. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.121.11.259
  18. Mesalam A, Kong RM, Khan I, Chowdhury MMR, Choi BH, Kim SW, Cho KW, Jin JI, Kong IK. 2017. Effect of charcoal:dextran stripped fetal bovine serum on in vitro development of bovine embryos. Theriogenology 17:312-319.
  19. Murakami M, Dong YJ, Suzuki T, Taniguchi M, Kaedei Y, Sato Y, Tanihara F, Otoi T. 2011. Development and subsequent cryotolerance of domestic cat embryos cultured in serum-free and serum-containing media. Cryobiology 63:170-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cryobiol.2011.06.002
  20. Pinyopummintr T, Bavister BD. 1994. Development of bovine embryos in a cell-free culture medium: effects of type of serum, timing of its inclusion and heat inactivation. Theriogenology 41:1241-1249. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(94)90481-W
  21. Razek IAE, Charpigny G, Kodja S, Marquant-Leguienne B, Mermillod P, Guyader-Joly C, et al. 2000. Differences in lipid composition between in vivo- and in vitro-produced bovine embryos. Theriogenology 53:346.
  22. Rizos D, Gutierrez-Adan A, Perez-Garnelo S, De La Fuente J, Boland MP, Lonergan P. 2003. Bovine embryo culture in the presence or absence of serum: implications for blastocyst development, cryotolerance, and messenger RNA expression. Biol. Reprod. 68:236-243. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.102.007799
  23. Roth Z, Inbar G and Arav A. 2008. Comparison of oocyte developmental competence and follicular steroid content of nulliparous heifers and cows at different stages of lactation. Theriogenology 69:932-939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.02.001
  24. Sata R, Tsujii H, Abe H, Yamashita S, Hosh H. 1999. Fatty acid composition of bovine embryos cultured in serum-free and serum-containing medium during early embryonic development. J. Reprod. Dev. 45:97-103. https://doi.org/10.1262/jrd.45.97
  25. Su L, Yang S, He X, Li X, Ma J, Wang Y, Presicce GA and Ji W. 2012. Effect of donor age on the developmental competence of bovine oocytes retrieved by ovum pick up. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 47:184-189. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2009.01349.x
  26. Thompson JG, Mitchell M, Kind KL. 2007. Embryo culture and longterm consequences. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 19:43-52. https://doi.org/10.1071/RD06129
  27. Van Langendonckt A, Donnay I, Schuurbiers N, Auquier P, Carolan C, Massip A, et al. 1997. Effects of supplementation with fetal calf serum on development of bovine embryos in synthetic oviduct fluid medium. J. Reprod. Fertil. 109:87-93. https://doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.1090087
  28. Ward FA, Lonergan P, Enright BP, Boland MP. 2000. Factors affecting recovery and quality of oocytes for bovine embryo production in vitro using ovum pick-up technology. Theriogenology 54:433-446. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(00)00360-5
  29. Wirthensohn K, Barth CA. 1985. Influence of hormones and growth factors on viability, DNA, and protein content of adult hepatocytes in primary culture. In Vitro Cell Dev. Biol. 21:546-552. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02620884
  30. Wrenzycki C, Herrmann D, Lucas-Hahn A, Lemme E, Korsawe K, Niemann H. 2004. Gene expression patterns in in vitroproduced and somatic nuclear transfer-derived preimplantation bovine embryos: relationship to the large offspring syndrome? Anim. Reprod. Sci. 82-83:593-603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2004.05.009