DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Validation Study of the Korean Child Behavior Checklist 1.5-5 in the Diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder and Non-Autism Spectrum Disorder

  • Cho, Han Nah (Department of Child Welfare and Studies, Sookmyung Women's University) ;
  • Ha, Eun Hye (Department of Child Welfare and Studies, Sookmyung Women's University)
  • 투고 : 2018.07.11
  • 심사 : 2018.09.17
  • 발행 : 2019.01.01

초록

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to analyze the discriminant validity and the clinical cut off scores of the Child Behavior Checklist 1.5-5 (CBCL 1.5-5) in the diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and non-ASD. Methods: In total, 104 ASD and 441 non-ASD infants were included in the study. T-test, discriminant analysis, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, and odds ratio analysis were performed on the data. Results: The discriminant validity was confirmed by mean differences and discriminant analysis on the subscales of Emotionally reactive, Somatic complaints, Withdrawn, Sleep problems, Attention problems, Aggressive behavior, Internalizing problems, Externalizing problems, and Total problems, along with the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)-oriented scales between the two groups. ROC analysis showed that the following subscales significantly separated ASD from normal infants: Emotionally reactive, Somatic complaints, Withdrawn, Sleep problems, Attention problems, Aggressive behavior, Internalizing problems, Externalizing problems, Total problems, and DSM pervasive developmental problems. Moreover, the clinical cut off score criteria adopted in the Korean-CBCL 1.5-5 were shown to be valid for the subscales Withdrawn, Internalizing problems, Externalizing problems, Total problems, and DSM pervasive developmental problems. Conclusion: The subscales of Withdrawn, Internalizing problems, Externalizing problems, Total problems, and DSM pervasive developmental problems significantly discriminated infants with ASD.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5). 5th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association;2013.
  2. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 4th edition, text revision (DSM-IV-TR). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association;2000.
  3. Lee SY. The role and implications of early detection and early intervention of autism spectrum disorders. Korean Journal of Early Childhood Special Education 2009;9:103-133.
  4. Lee SY, Lee SJ, Yoon SA. A study of support system for facilitating early diagnosis and intervention for young children with autism spectrum disorders: based on the experiences and the perceptions of parents. J Korean Assoc Pers Autism 2013;13:167-199.
  5. Dawson G, Rogers S, Munson J, Smith M, Winter J, Greenson J, et al. Randomized, controlled trial of an intervention for toddlers with autism: the Early Start Denver Model. Pediatrics 2010;125:e17-e23. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2009-0958
  6. Wetherby AM, Allen L, Cleary J, Kublin K, Goldstein H. Validity and reliability of the communication and symbolic behavior scales developmental profile with very young children. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2002;45:1202-1218. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2002/097)
  7. Kerig P, Wenar C. Developmental psychopathology: from infancy through adolescence. 5th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Education;2005.
  8. Yuen T, Carter MT, Szatmari P, Ungar WJ. Cost-effectiveness of universal or high-risk screening compared to surveillance monitoring in autism spectrum disorder. J Autism Dev Disord 2018;48:2968-2979. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-018-3571-4
  9. Schopler E, Reichler RJ, Renner BR. The childhood autism rating scale (CARS). Los Angeles: Western Psychological Service;1988.
  10. Lord C, Rutter M, DiLavore PC, Risi S, Gotham K, Bishop SL. Autism diagnostic observation schedule: ADOS. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services;2003.
  11. Gilliam JE. Gilliam autism rating scale: examiner's manual. Austin: Pro-ed;1995.
  12. Achenbach TM, Rescorla LA. Manual for the ASEBA preschool forms & profiles. Burlington: University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth, & Families;2000.
  13. Oh KJ, Kim YA. Korean version of the child behavior checklist for ages 1.5-5. Seoul: Huno Consulting;2009.
  14. Sikora DM, Hall TA, Hartley SL, Gerrard-Morris AE, Cagle S. Does parent report of behavior differ across ADOS-G classifications: analysis of scores from the CBCL and GARS. J Autism Dev Disord 2008;38:440-448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-007-0407-z
  15. Lee SH, Ha EH, Song DH. Discriminant validity of the child behavior checklist for ages 1.5-5 in diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder. J Korean Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2015;26:30-37. https://doi.org/10.5765/jkacap.2015.26.1.30
  16. Ha EH, Kim SY, Song DH, Kwak EH, Eom SY. Discriminant validity of the CBCL 1.5-5 in diagnosis of developmental delayed infants. J Korean Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2011;22:120-127. https://doi.org/10.5765/JKACAP.2011.22.2.120
  17. Muratori F, Narzisi A, Tancredi R, Cosenza A, Calugi S, Saviozzi I, et al. The CBCL 1.5-5 and the identification of preschoolers with autism in Italy. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci 2011;20:329-338. https://doi.org/10.1017/S204579601100045X
  18. Miska L, Jan H. Evaluation of current statistical approaches for predictive geomorphological mapping. Geomorphology 2005;67:299-315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2004.10.006
  19. Lee J, Kim YA, Oh KJ. Discriminant validity and clinical utility of the Korean version of the Child Behavior Checklist for Ages 1.5-5. Korean J Clin Psychol 2009;28:171-186. https://doi.org/10.15842/kjcp.2009.28.1.010
  20. Kwon YJ, Ha EH. Efficiency of the CBCL 1.5-5 DSM pervasive developmental problem scale on discriminant diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder and developmental delay. Korean J Play Therapy 2015;18:133-147. https://doi.org/10.17641/KAPT.18.2.4