References
- Meuwissen THE, Hayes BJ, Goddard ME. Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics 2001;157:1819-29. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/157.4.1819
- Mäntysaari E, Z Liu, vanRaden PM. Interbull validation test for genomic evaluations. Interbull bulletin 2010;41:4-5.
- Falconer DS, Mackay TFC. Introduction to quantitative genetics. 4th ed. Harlow, UK: Longman; 1996.
- Schaeffer LR. Strategy for applying genome-wide selection in dairy cattle. J Anim Breed Genet 2006;123:218-23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0388.2006.00595.x
- Van Grevenhof EM, Van Arendonk JAM, Bijma P. Response to genomic selection: The bulmer effect and the potential of genomic selection when the number of phenotypic records is limiting. Genet Sel Evol 2012;44:26. https://doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-44-26
- Daetwyler HD, Villanueva B, Bijma P, et al. Inbreeding in genome-wide selection. J Anim Breed Genet 2007;124:369-76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0388.2007.00693.x
- Jenko J, Wiggans GR, Cooper TA, et al. Cow genotyping strategies for genomic selection in a small dairy cattle population. J Dairy Sci 2017;100:439-52. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2016-11479
- Buch LH, Kargo M, Berg P, et al. The value of cows in reference populations for genomic selection of new functional traits. Animal 2012;6:880-6. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731111002205
- Ding X, Zhang Z, Li X, et al. Accuracy of genomic prediction for milk production traits in the Chinese Holstein population using a reference population consisting of cows. J Dairy Sci 2013;96:5315-23. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2012-6194
- Uemoto Y, Osawa T, Saburi J. Effect of genotyped cows in the reference population on the genomic evaluation of Holstein cattle. Animal 2017;11:382-93. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731116001762
- Calus MPL, de Haas Y, Veerkamp RF. Combining cow and bull reference populations to increase accuracy of genomic prediction and genome-wide association studies. J Dairy Sci 2013;96:6703-15. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2012-6013
- Pryce JE, Nguyen TTT, Axford M, et al. Symposium review: Building a better cow-the Australian experience and future perspectives. J Dairy Sci 2018;101:3702-13. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-13377
- Cunningham EP. Multi-stage index selection. Theor Appl Genet 1975;46:55-61. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00264755
- Van Raden PM, Van Tassell C, Wiggans P, et al. Invited review: Reliability of genomic predictions for North American Holstein bulls. J Dairy Sci 2009;92:16-24. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2008-1514
- Olson KM, van Raden PM, Tooker ME, et al. Differences among methods to validate genomic evaluations for dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci 2011;94:2613-20. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2010-3877
- Daetwyler HD, Villanueva B, Woolliams JA. Accuracy of predicting the genetic risk of disease using a genome-wide approach. PLoS One 2008;3:e3395. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003395
- Hayes BJ, Daetwyler HD, Bowman PJ, et al. Accuracy of genomic selection: comparing theory and results. Proc Assoc Advmt Anim Breed Genet 2009;18:34-37.
- Garrick DJ, Taylor JF, Fernando RL. Deregressing estimated breeding values and weighting information for genomic regression analyses. Genet Sel Evol 2009;41:55. https://doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-41-55
- Liu Z, Seefried FR, Reinhardt F, et al. Impacts of both reference population size and inclusion of a residual polygenic effect on the accuracy of genomic prediction. Genet Sel Evol 2011;43:19. https://doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-43-19
- Gonzalez-Recio O, Pryce JE, Haile-Mariam H, et al. Incorporating heifer feed efficiency in the Australian selection index using genomic selection. J Dairy Sci 2014;97:3883-93. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2013-7515
- Weigel KA, Hoffman PC, Herring W. Potential gains in lifetime net merit from genomic testing of cows, heifers, and calves on commercial dairy farms. J Dairy Sci 2012;95:2215-25. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2011-4877
- Thomasen JR, Sorensen AC, Lund MS, et al. Adding cows to the reference population makes a small dairy population competitive. J Dairy Sci 2014;97:5822-32. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2014-7906
- Pryce JE, Nguyen TTT, Axford M, et al. Symposium review: Building a better cow-The Australian experience and future perspectives. J Dairy Sci 2018;101:3702-13. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-13377
- Habier D, Fernando RL, Dekkers JCM. The impact of genetic relationship information on genome-assisted breeding values. Genetics 2007;177:2389-97. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.107.081190
- Habier D, Tetens J, Seefried FR, et al. The impact of genetic relationship information on genomic breeding values in German Holstein cattle. Genet Sel Evol 2010;42:5. https://doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-42-5
- Su G, Ma P, Nielsen US, et al. Sharing reference data and including cows in the reference population improve genomic predictions in Danish Jersey. Animal 2016;10:1067-75. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731115001792
- Goddard ME. Genomic selection: prediction of accuracy and maximisation of long term response. Genetica 2009;136:245-57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10709-008-9308-0
- Solberg TR, Sonesson AK, Woolliams JA, et al. Genomic selection using different marker types and densities. J Anim Sci 2008;86:2447-54. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2007-0010
- Muir, WM. Comparison of genomic and traditional BLUP-estimated breeding value accuracy and selection response under alternative trait and genomic parameters. J Anim Breed Genet 2007;124:342-55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0388.2007.00700.x
- Su G, Madsen P, Nielsen US, et al. Genomic prediction for Nordic red cattle using one-step and selection index blending. J Dairy Sci 2012;95:909-17. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2011-4804