Journal of the Korea Convergence Society (한국융합학회논문지)

Korea Convergence Society (한국융합학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The effect of information seeking style and news literacy of card news users on recommendation intention: Focused on Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)

카드뉴스 이용자의 정보추구성향과 뉴스 리터러시가 추천의도에 미치는 영향: 기술수용모델(TAM) 모델을 중심으로

  • Choi, Myung-Il (Department of Advertising & Public Relations, Namseoul University)
  • 최명일 (남서울대학교 광고홍보학과)
  • Received : 2018.10.22
  • Accepted : 2019.01.20
  • Published : 2019.01.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In this study, the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) was applied to explore the process of using card news. Card news users are found to be active in searching and selecting appropriate news for themselves, information seeking style and news literacy were established as antecedent variables that can influence card news usage. A survey of 400 university students with experience of using card news was conducted. For statistical analysis, SEM was conducted. The analysis showed that information seeking style significantly affects perceived ease of use (PEU) and that news literacy influences neither PEU nor PU. PEU was found to have a significant effect on PU, and both PEU and PU had a significant effect on recommendation intention.

이 연구에서는 기술수용모델(Technology Acceptance Model: TAM)을 적용하여 카드뉴스 이용자의 정보추구성향과 뉴스 리터러시가 지각된 용이성과 지각된 유용성에 미치는 영향, 지각된 용이성과 지각된 유용성이 추천의도에 미치는 영향을 살펴보았다. 카드 뉴스 이용 경험이 있는 대학생 400명을 대상으로 설문조사를 하였으며, 통계분석은 구조방정식모델(SEM)을 이용하였다. 분석 결과, 정보추구성향은 지각된 용이성에 유의미한 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났고, 뉴스 리터러시는 지각된 용이성과 지각된 유용성 모두에 영향을 미치지 않는 것으로 나타났다. 지각된 용이성은 지각된 유용성에 유의미한 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났으며 지각된 용이성과 지각된 유용성 모두는 추천의도에 유의미한 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다.

Keywords

OHHGBW_2019_v10n1_141_f0001.png 이미지

Fig. 1. Proposed Research Model

OHHGBW_2019_v10n1_141_f0002.png 이미지

Fig. 2. Result of Research Model

Table 1. Results of Measurement Model

OHHGBW_2019_v10n1_141_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. Result of Discriminant Validity

OHHGBW_2019_v10n1_141_t0002.png 이미지

References

  1. Y. S. Cho & J. M. Kim. (2017). A Study on Likability, Understanding Level, Reliability, Satisfaction, Continuous Usage Intention According to a Difference in a News Providing Type. Journal of Digital Convergence, 15(7), 383-391. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2017.15.7.383
  2. S. C. Hong & J. K. Pae. (2017). An analysis of card news and deconstructing news values in curated news contents in the digital Era. Journal of internet computing and services, 18(2), 105-111. https://doi.org/10.7472/jksii.2017.18.2.105
  3. N. K. Park. (2010). Adoption and use of computer-based Voice Over Internet Protocol Service. Journal of Communication, 60(1), 40-72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01440.x
  4. F. D. Davis. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-339. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  5. V. Venkatesh., F. D. Davis & M. G. Morris. (2007). Dead or alive?: The development, trajectory and future of technology adoption research. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8(4), 267-286. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00120
  6. S. M. Miller. (1987). Monitoring and blunting: Validation of a questionnaire to assess styles of information seeking under threat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(2), 345-353. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.2.345
  7. E. Katz., J. G. Blumler & M. Gurevitch. (1974). Utilization of Mass Communication by Individual, in E. Katz & J. G. Blumer.(Ed.). The uses of mass communication: Current perspectives on gratification research(pp. 19-32), Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  8. J. D. Rayburn & P. Palmgreen. (1984). Merging uses and gratifications and expectancy-value theory. Communication Research, 11(4), 537-562. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365084011004005
  9. D. Buckingham. (2002). Media education: Literacy, learning and contemporary culture. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  10. R. Hobbs & R. Frost. (2003). Measuring the acquisition of media literacy skills. Reading Research Quarterly, 38(3), 330-355. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.38.3.2
  11. W. R. King & J. He.(2005). Understanding the role and methods of meta-analysis in IS research. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 16(1), 665-686.
  12. J. Wu & A. Lederer. (2009). A meta-analysis of the role of environment-based voluntariness in information technology acceptance. MIS Quarterly, 33(2), 419-432. https://doi.org/10.2307/20650298
  13. S. Hong., M. L. Malik & M. K. Lee.(2003). Testing configural, metric, scalar, and latent mean invariance across genders in sociotropy and autonomy using a non-western Sample. Educational and Psychology Measurement, 63(4), 636-654. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164403251332
  14. J. Hair., W. Black., B. Babin., R. Anderson & R. Tatham. (2006). Multivariate Data Analysis(6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
  15. R. P. Bagozzi & Y. Yi. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02723327
  16. C. Fornell & D. F. Larcker. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104