Journal of the Korea Convergence Society (한국융합학회논문지)

Korea Convergence Society (한국융합학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Application of Physical Activity Planning Behavior Theory Model of Rehabilitation Center Participants

재활센터 이용자의 신체활동 계획행동이론모형 적용 연구

  • Lee, Jong-Bok (Dept. of Rehabilitation Sports, Bucheon University) ;
  • Kim, Do-Jin (Dept. of Rehabilitation Sports, Bucheon University)
  • 이종복 (부천대학교 재활스포츠과) ;
  • 김도진 (부천대학교 재활스포츠과)
  • Received : 2019.01.07
  • Accepted : 2019.02.20
  • Published : 2019.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to verify the physical activity planning behavior theory model of rehabilitation center users. For this purpose, a questionnaire survey was conducted for sports athletes who visited the sports rehabilitation hospital and rehabilitation center in the metropolitan area. A total of 203 questionnaires were used for the actual analysis. The collected data were analyzed using SPSS 18.0 and AMOS 18.0. In this way, we confirmed that intention has a significant direct effect on the behavior in the application of the physical activity planning theoretical model based on the social cognitive theory of rehabilitation center participants.

본 연구는 재활센터 이용자의 신체활동 계획행동이론모형을 적용하여 검증하고자 하였다. 이를 위해 수도권소재 스포츠재활병원 및 치료센터를 방문하여 재활을 받는 생활체육인을 대상으로 설문을 실시하였다. 미회수 및 응답의 충실성을 등을 고려해 분석에 활용하였으며 실제 분석에 이용된 설문지는 203부이다. 수집된 자료는 SPSS 18.0과 AMOS 18.0을 이용하여 분석하였다. 먼저 조사대상자 특성을 위해 빈도분석을 실시하였으며, 문항의 다변량 정규성, 평균, 표준편차 검증을 위해 기술통계를 실시하였다. 각 요인별 단일차원성 검증을 위해 확인적 요인분석을 실시하였으며, 신뢰도 검증을 위해 Cronbach's alpha를 실시하였다. 잠재변인간 관계를 탐색하기 위해 상관분석을 실시하였으며, 연구모형의 타당성 검증을 위해 경로분석을 실시하였다. 이와 같은 절차를 통해 재활센터 이용자의 사회인지이론에 기초한 신체활동 계획행동이론모형의 적용에 있어 의도가 행동에 유의미한 직접적인 영향을 미친다는 것을 확인하였다.

Keywords

OHHGBW_2019_v10n2_325_f0001.png 이미지

fig 1. physical activity planning behavior theory model

Table 1. characteristics of the subjects

OHHGBW_2019_v10n2_325_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. Results of single dimensionality test by factor

OHHGBW_2019_v10n2_325_t0002.png 이미지

Table 3. Mean(M)/standard deviation(SD), correlation

OHHGBW_2019_v10n2_325_t0003.png 이미지

Table 4. path analysis

OHHGBW_2019_v10n2_325_t0004.png 이미지

References

  1. Eun, J. W. (2016). Psychological basic of participation culture in rehabilitation sports: Structural factor reorganization of continuance intention to participate in rehabilitation exercise. Korea science & Art forum, 25, 263-271. https://doi.org/10.17548/ksaf.2016.09.25.263
  2. Jang, C. O., Kim, J. M., Kim D. J. (2017). Basic research for the development of Korea workers physical activity practice models. The Korea journal of sports science. 25(6), 1487-1499.
  3. Ajzen, I., Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  4. Ajzen, I., Fishbein, M. (1991). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N. J.
  5. Yoo, J., Kim, Y. J(2002). Analyses of theoretical models for exercise adherence. Korean journal of sport psychology, 13(3), 127-139.
  6. Yoo, J., Lee, S. A. (2008). Analyses of psycho-social determinants in processes of exercise behaviors for older adults. Journal of the Korean Gerontological society, 28(4), 1213-1225.
  7. Prochaska, J. O., & DiClemente, C. C. (1983). Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: Tovard an integrative model of change. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51(3), 390-395. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.51.3.390
  8. Ajzen, I. (2002) Constructing a TPB questionnaire: Conceptual and methodological considerations. http://www.uni-bielefeld.de/ikg/zick/ajzen%20construction%20a%20tpb%20questionnaire.
  9. Godin, G., & Shephard, R. J. (1985). A simple method to assess exercise behavior in the community. Canadian Journal of Applied Sport Sciences, 10(3), 141-146.
  10. Lee, K. H., Kim, B. J., An, J. D. (2004). Sports psychology test handbook. Rainbow press.
  11. Kim, Y. H. (2002). Adolescent’ stages of change, decision balance, self-efficacy in exercise: Application of transtheoretical model. Korean journal of sport psychology, 13(3), 1-19.
  12. Ajzen, I. (1988). From intentions to actions. In I. Ajzen(Ed), Attitude, personality, and behavior. London: Open University Press.
  13. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavior change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
  14. Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist. 37, 122-147. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.37.2.122
  15. Bandura, A. (1996). Ontological and epistemological terrains revisited. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 27, 323-345. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7916(96)00049-3