Fig. 1. Used Device. (A: Mammography, B: Dosimeter)
Fig. 2. Used mammo graphy phantom. (A: BR3070, BR5050, BR7030 phantom, B: 010A, 010B, 010C phantom, C: BR3D phantom, D: 010A, 010B, 010C target map of phantom, E: BR3D target map of phantom)
Fig. 3. Position of phantom and dosimeter for measurement of AGD
Fig. 4. Experimental process (A: 010A, 010B, 010C, B:Mammography image of 010A, 010B,010C C: BR3D D: Mammography image of BR3D
Table 1. AGD of phantom (mGy)
Table 2. AGD of thickness as phantom (mGy)
Table 3. ASD of FFDM and DBT as demsity of phantom (mGy)
Table 4. Assessment of image quality in 010A, 010B, 010Cv phantom
References
- B. Y. Sim. (2016). Cancer Screening Guidelines in Korea. The Korean Journal of Medicine, 90(3), 224-230. DOI : 10.3904/kjm.2016.90.3.224
- M. M. Jang. & H. S. Kim. (2017). Analysis of Factors Related to Pain Relief on Modified Mammography. Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology,11(5), 413-421 DOI : 10.7742/jksr.2017.11.5.413
- The Korea Central Cancer Registry. (2013). Annual report of cancer statistics in Korea in 2011. Ministry of Health and Welfare. http://ncc.re.kr/manage/manage03_033_list.jsp
- M. H. Kim. & G. S. Cheon. (2016). Changes in Spatial Resolution at Position of the Detector in Digital Mammography System. Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology,10(3), 215-222 DOI : 10.7742/jksr.2016.10.3.215
- The Korea Central Cancer Registry. (2017). Annual report of cancer statistics in Korea in 2015. Ministry of Health and Welfare. http://ncc.re.kr/cancerStatsList.ncc?searchKey=total&searchValue=&pageNum=1)
- T. W. Won. (2017). Ductal carcinoma in situ arising within a fibroadenoma of breas. Journal of Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society, 18(11), 454-458 DOI : 10.5762/KAIS.2017.18.11.454
- H. O. Y. Jeong. & P. G. JO. (2018). Quality Management for Mammography Equipment and Mammography. Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology, 12(5), 683-692 DOI : 10.7742/jksr.2018.12.5.683
- H. J. Shin. & A. Lee. (2015). Breast Cancer Screening in Korean Woman with Dense Breast Tissue. The Korean Society of Radiology, 73(5), 279-286. DOI : 10.3348/jksr.2015.73.5.279
- S. H. Lee. & B. J. Kang (2018). Breast Cancer in Women Younger than 35-Years-Old: Correlation of MRI Findings with Clinicopathological Features and Immunohistochemical Subtypes Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology, 79(4), 196-203 DOI : 10.3348/jksr.2018.79.4.196
- Etta D. Pisano. & Constantine Gatsonis. (2005). Diagnostic Performance of Digital versus Film Mammography for Breast-Cancer Screening. The New England Journal of Medicine, 353(17), 1773-1783. DOI : 10.1056/NEJMoa052911
- Skaane. P. & Bandos. Al. (2013). Comparison of digital mammography alone and digital mammography plus tomosynthesis in a population-based screening program. Radiology, 267(1), 47-56. DOI : 10.1148/radiol.12121373
- Friedewald. SM. & Rafferty. EA. (2014). Breast cancer screening using tomosynthesis in combination with digital mammography. The journal of the American Medical Association, 311(24), 2499-2507. DOI : 10.1001/jama.2014.6095
- Randell L. K. & Beth A. S. (2001). A survey of clinical factors and patient dose in mammography. The International journal of Medical Physics Research and Practice, 28(7), 1449-1454. DOI : 10.1118/1.1382606
- Ioannis. S.& Sankararaman. S. (2007). Computation of the glandular radiation dose in digital tomosynthesis of the breast. NIH Public Access, 34(1), 221-232 DOI : 10.1118/1.2400836
- Olgar. T. & Kahn. T. (2012). Average Glandular Dose in Digital Mammography and Breast Tomosynthesis. The journal of Thieme, 184(10), 911-918 DOI : 10.1055/s-0032-1312877