International Journal of Advanced Culture Technology

  • 제7권4호
  • /
  • Pages.172-186
  • /
  • 2019
  • /
  • 2288-7202(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-7318(eISSN)
국제문화기술진흥원 (The International Promotion Agency of Culture Technology)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Phenomenological Study on the Information Technology Acceptance of the Korean Baby Boomer Generation

  • Kim, Sohyun (Department of Consumer Science, Seoul National University) ;
  • Brady, John Thomas (Department of Consumer Science, Seoul National University)
  • 투고 : 2019.10.27
  • 심사 : 2019.11.15
  • 발행 : 2019.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

As ICT technology develops rapidly and social and consumer interactions require more knowledge of the technology, the interest for baby boomers' ICT technology acceptance is increasing as they age. However, previous studies have limitations as they lack a systematic and in-depth understanding of this phenomenon in which the emerging elderly population embraces emerging technology. To overcome this limitation, this study carried out a phenomenological study on baby boomers' ICT technology acceptance. In addition, since existing studies have just simply listed variables or proved the relationship between a few variables, this study aimed to find the relationship between variables by analyzing the data obtained through semi-structured interviews. Through this procedure, it was aimed to construct conceptual model which illustrates the relationships between variables so that understanding the phenomenon of baby boomers' acceptance of ICT technology with a holistic view could be possible. The ten variables suggested by Lee & Coughlin (2015) that cover multiple sides of baby boomers' technology acceptance were used. As a result, we found that there is a sequential relationship between these variables and different agents can be related to each variable in sequence. Also, from an ecological perspective, we analyzed baby boomers and their surroundings to find agents involved in this phenomenon.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (CESCR), "General comment No. 6: the economic, social and cultural rights of older persons", Thirteenth Session, UN Doc. E/C.12/1995/16/Rev.1, 1995.
  2. J. W. Choi, Y. S. Chun, and J. Y. Rha, “A Study on the Expanded Consumer Roles in ICT Environment,” Consumer policy and education review, Vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 55-78, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.15790/cope.2015.11.4.055
  3. J.H. Oh, “The Effect of Baby Boom Generation’s Leisure Activities on ICT Skills,” Journal of digital convergence, Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 1-12, 2018. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2018.16.3.001
  4. Y.M. Jang, Y.L. Hur, and M.S. Jung, “A study on the Wellness Change of Life in the Baby Boomer Generation,” Journal of digital Convergence, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 215-220, 2015. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2015.13.3.215
  5. H.W. Lee, S.K. Kim, E.L. Ko, J.C. Eu, and Y.P. Ji, “The Age-Related Changes in Cognitive Function,” The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 127-148, 2012. https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2012.24.2.003
  6. L. Duva, Generational Cohort Behaviors Toward Information Security and Its Effect on E-commerce/E-banking, Ph.D. Thesis. University of Utica, Utica, NY, USA., 2018.
  7. K. Yang and L.D. Jolly, “Age cohort analysis in adoption of mobile data services: gen Xers versus baby boomers,” Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol. 25, No. 5, pp. 272-280, 2008. DOI 10.1108/07363760810890507
  8. A. Peine, I. Rollwagen, and L. Neven, “The rise of the “innosumer”-rethinking older technology users,” Technological forecasting and social change, Vol. 82, No. 1, pp. 199-214, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.06.013
  9. S. Badowska, A. Zamojska, and A. Rogala, "Baby boomers' attitudes toward innovations: empirical research in Poland," Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 213, pp. 1050-1056, 2015. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.524
  10. D.D. Huyler and D.J. Ciocca, "Baby Boomers: The use of technology to support learning," Florida International University, USA., 2016.
  11. M.L. Fang, S.L. Canham, L. Battersby, J. Sixsmith, M. Wada, and A. Sixsmith, “Exploring privilege in the digital divide: implications for theory, policy, and practice,” The Gerontologist, Vol. 59, No. 1, pp. 1-15, 2018. doi:10.1093/geront/gny037
  12. Ng, W.X., Lim, C.C., Lim, X.C., Ng, S.N., and Tan, Y.J., Consumer resistance to mobile banking services: An empirical study among baby boomers in Malaysia urban areas, Ph.D. Thesis. University of UTAR, Negeri Perak, Malaysia., 2013
  13. I. Szmigin and M. Carrigan, “The older consumer as innovator: does cognitive age hold the key?,” Journal of Marketing Management, Vol. 16, No. 5, pp. 505-527, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1362/026725700785046038
  14. J.W. Arts, R.T. Frambach, and T.H. Bijmolt, “Generalizations on consumer innovation adoption: A meta-analysis on drivers of intention and behavior,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp. 134-144, 2011. doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2010.11.002
  15. Minsoo Park (2018) Cognitive Factors in Adaptive Information Access, International Journal of Advanced Culture Technology(IJACT), 6:4, 309-316. DOI https://doi.org /10.17703//IJACT2018.6.4.309
  16. A. Peine, V. Van Cooten, and L. Neven, “Rejuvenating design: Bikes, batteries, and older adopters in the diffusion of e-bikes,” Science, Technology, & Human Values, Vol. 42, No. 3, pp. 429-459, 2017. DOI: 10.1177/01622433916664589
  17. T.L. Mitzner, J. Savla, W.R. Boot, J. Sharit, N. Charness, S.J. Czaja, and W.A. Rogers, “Technology adoption by older adults: findings from the PRISM trial,” The Gerontologist, Vol. 59, No. 1, pp. 34-44, 2018. doi: 10.1093/geront/gny113
  18. C. Lee and J.F. Coughlin, “PERSPECTIVE: Older adults' adoption of technology: an integrated approach to identifying determinants and barriers,” Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 32, No. 5, pp. 747-759, 2015. DOI: 10.1111/jpim.12176
  19. K. Chen and A.H.S. Chan, “Gerontechnology acceptance by elderly Hong Kong Chinese: a senior technology acceptance model (STAM),” Ergonomics, Vol. 57, No. 5, pp. 635-652, 2014. DOI: 10.1080/00140139.2014.895855
  20. A.L. Strauss, Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists, New York: Cambridge University Press, 1987.
  21. C. Moustakas, Phenomenological research methods, Sage, 1994.
  22. J.W. Creswell, Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches, Sage, 2013.
  23. Ji Sook Kang, Sung Ji Park (2019) The Impact of Communication on the Overall Quality of Life in Elderly Koreans, International Journal of Advanced Culture Technology(IJACT), 7:3, 58-64 DOI 10.17703/IJACT.2019.7.3.58