Journal of Digital Convergence (디지털융복합연구)

The Society of Digital Policy and Management (한국디지털정책학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effects of Prior Sales Change on Asymmetric Cost Behavior of R&D Costs

전기 매출액 변동이 연구개발비의 비대칭적 원가행태에 미치는 영향

  • Noh, Gil-Kwan (Institute of Business Administration, Pusan National University) ;
  • Lee, Jeong-Eun (Institute of Business Administration, Pusan National University)
  • 노길관 (부산대학교 경영연구원) ;
  • 이정은 (부산대학교 경영연구원)
  • Received : 2019.06.18
  • Accepted : 2019.12.20
  • Published : 2019.12.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the effect of Prior Sales change on R&D Costs and each detail item, and to analyze what decision managers make when changing sales. In order to conduct a more in-depth analysis as well as a one-period model of Anderson et al. (2003), which was used in previous studies, the two-period model of Banker et al.(2014) And analyzed the detailed items. As a result of the analysis, it is possible to confirm cost stickiness behavior only in the depreciation cost and others due to the limit of the model in the one period model. For a more in-depth analysis, the analysis of two-period model showed that labor costs and other items showed cost stickiness behavior when prior sales increased, but total R&D costs showed a anti-cost stickiness behavior. When prior sales decline, consigned service costs showed a cost stickiness behavior. This study is meaningful because it analyzed the effect of prior sales change on R&D cost behavior which were not performed in previous studies. Furthermore, we expect to be able to conduct more detailed research by sales and industry in future studies.

본 연구의 목적은 전기 매출액 변동이 연구개발비 및 각 세부항목에 미치는 영향에 대하여 검증을 실시하고 전기매출액 변동 시 경영진들이 어떠한 의사결정을 수행하는지를 분석하는 것이다. 분석을 실시하기 위하여 선행연구에서 주로 사용되었던 Anderson et al.(2003)의 1기간 모형뿐만 아니라 보다 심도 깊은 분석을 실시하기 위하여 Banker et al.(2014)의 2기간 모형을 이용하여 연구개발비 및 각 세부항목에 대한 분석을 실시하였다. 분석결과 1기간 모형에서는 모형의 한계로 인하여 감가상각비, 기타에서만 하방경직적 원가행태를 확인할 수 있었다. 보다 심층적인 분석을 위하여 2기간 모형으로 분석한 결과 전기 매출액이 증가하는 경우 인건비, 기타 항목에서 하방경직적인 원가행태를 나타내었으나 총 연구개발비는 역 하방경직적인 원가행태를 나타내었다. 전기 매출액이 감소하는 경우 위탁용역비에서 하방경직적인 원가행태가 나타났다. 본 연구는 기존 연구에서 수행되지 않았던 연구개발비 및 세부항목에 대하여 전기 매출액 변동이 원가행태에 미치는 영향을 분석하였기에 그 의의가 있다. 더 나아가 추후 연구에서 매출별, 산업별로 보다 구체적인 연구를 할 수 있을 것이라 기대한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ministry of Science and ICT. (2019). Investment plan for 3 trillion won to create bio-economic performance. https://www.msit.go.kr/web/msipContents/contentsView.do?cateId=mssw311&artId=1590433
  2. Korea Accounting Institute. (2015). 2015 K-IFRS (published in 2014)
  3. E. Noreen. (1991). Conditions Under Which Activity-Based Cost Systems Provide Relevant Costs. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 3(Fall), 159-168.
  4. E. Noreen & N. Soderstorm. (1997). The Accuracy of proportional cost Models: Evidence from Hospital Service Departments. Review of Accounting Studies, 2(1), 89-114. DOI : 10.1023/A:1018325711417
  5. M. Anderson, R. D. Banker & S. Janakiraman. (2003). Are selling, general and administrative costs sticky"? Journal of Accounting Research, 41(1), 47-64. DOI : 10.1111/1475-679X.00095
  6. D. Weiss. (2010). Cost behavior and analyst's earnings forecasts. The Accounting Review, 85(4), 1441-1472. DOI : 10.2308/accr.2010.85.4.1441
  7. C. T. Horngren, S. M. Datar & M. V. Rajan. (2012). Cost Accounting 14th Edition. PEARSON.
  8. R. D. Banker, D. Byzalov, M. Ciftci & R. Mashruwala. (2014). The Moderating Effect of Prior Sales Changes on Asymmetric Cost Behavior. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 26(2), 221-242. DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.2308/jmar-50726
  9. R. D. Banker & D. Byzalov. (2014). Asymmetric Cost Behavior. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 26(2), 43-79. DOI : 10.2308/jmar-50846
  10. J. Y. Shin, I. Y. Hwang, S. W. Kwon & S. R. Choi. (2016). Asymmetric SG&A Cost Behavior of Chaebol Firms. Korean Management Review, 45(6), 1929-1953. DOI : 10.17287/kmr.2016.45.6.1929
  11. K. Daniel, D. Hirshleifer & A. Subrahmanyam. (1998). Investor psychology and security market under and overreactions. Journal of Finance, 53, 1839-1885. DOI : 10.1111/0022-1082.00077
  12. T. K. Lant & A. F. Hurley. (1999). A contingency model of response to performance feedback: Escalation of commitment and incremental adaptation in resource investment decisions. Group and Organization Management, 24(4), 421-437. DOI : 10.1177/1059601199244002
  13. B. Bublitz & M. Ettredge. (1989). The Information in Discretionary Outlays: Advertising, Research, and Development. The Accounting Review, 64(1), 108-124.
  14. S. Chan, J. Martin & J. Kensinger. (1990). Corporate Research and Development Expenditure and Share Value. Journal of Financial Economics, 26(2), 255-276. DOI : 10.1016/0304-405X(90)90005-K
  15. J. S. Choi. (2009). Time-Series Analysis on the Lagged Economic Effects of R&D Expenditures. Korean Accounting Review, 34(1), 67-105.
  16. P. S. Sohn. (2014). Value Relevance of R&D Information based on Corporate Governance Perspective. Journal of CEO and Management Studies, 17(1), 1-25.