Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design (대한건축학회논문집:계획계)

Architectural Institute of Korea (대한건축학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Evaluation Study of Creativity Environmental Characteristics on Middle School of Subject Classroom System in Busan

부산시 교과교실제 운영 중학교의 창의환경특성 평가 연구

  • 여지연 (부산대학교 교육대학원 가정교육전공) ;
  • 이태경 (부산대학교 실내환경디자인학과)
  • Received : 2019.11.03
  • Accepted : 2019.12.18
  • Published : 2019.12.27
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The whole world is emphasizing 'creativity' as the core competence of the future society that global talents should have in the 21st century. Korea is also actively promoting the development of creative and convergent talents by recognizing these times and social needs. It is also required to improve the physical environment, which is an essential condition of education. As a result, the curriculum is being implemented as an institutional method for creative education since 2009, and there is a need for continuous research for effective operation of the curriculum system in relation to the establishment of the facilities of credit school system introduced from 2022 to be. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the indoor environment from the viewpoint of creative environment and to suggest the improvement direction for the improvement of the satisfaction of the education space for the students. The subjects of this study were three middle schools operated by the advanced classroom in Busan Metropolitan City. The results of this study were as follows; First, the satisfaction of autonomy and sociality was relatively high and the satisfaction of comfort was the lowest among the characteristics of creative environment. Second, it was found out that a priority should be given to ways to enhance sociality in space so as to support smooth communication and interaction between teachers, students, and students in the environmental plan for creative classroom classroom.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 한국연구재단

이 논문은 2016년도 정부(교육부)의 재원으로 한국연구재단의 지원을 받아 수행된 기초연구사업임(No. 2016R1D1A1B03933694).

References

  1. Amabile, T., & Gryskiewicz, N. (1989). Assessing the environment for creativity: The Work Environment Inventory. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Boston.
  2. Choi, H. (2016). A Study on the Nature of Spaces in Elementary Schools that Promote Creativity, Journal of Korean Education, 43(4), 33-62
  3. Choi, J. (2010). A Study on the factors of environmental psychology and spatial characters for the creativity support in office. Unpublished master's thesis, Konkuk University, Seoul, Korea.
  4. Choung, M, (2012). A study on the design of work space for the creativity support. Unpublished master's thesis, Hongik University, Seoul, Korea.
  5. Haner, U. (2005). Spaces for creativity and innovation in two established organizations. Creativity and Innovation Management, 14(3). pp.288-298. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-8691.2005.00347.x
  6. Kang, B. (2015). A study on classifying residential space for the creativity support through analyzing tool of housing environment trend. Unpublished master's thesis, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
  7. Kim, C. (2012). A Study on the Characteristics of the Library for Children to Cultivate their Creativity. Unpublished master's thesis, Chosun University, Gwangju, Korea.
  8. Koo, T. (2012). Characteristics of common area workplace designs for the creative class. Unpublished master's thesis, Konkuk University, Seoul, Korea.
  9. Kursty G. (2013). Four types of space that support creativity & innovation in business. Retrieved March 20, 2019 from http://enviableworkplace.com/four-types-of-space-that-support-creativity-innovation-in-business/
  10. Korean Educational Development Institute(2018). Subject Classroom System Guidebook, Chungcheongbuk-do, Korea. Korean Educational Development Institute.
  11. Kristensen, T.(2004). The physical context of creativity. Creativity and Innovation Management. 13(2). pp.89-96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-1690.2004.00297.x
  12. Lee, D. (2009). Practical Approach to Creativity Education. Paju, Kyoyookgwahaksa.
  13. Nam, J. (2012). An evaluation of interior environment of special classrooms improving creativity in elementary school. Unpublished master's thesis, Hanyang University, Seoul, Korea.
  14. Torrance, E. (1965). Rewarding creative behavior: Experiment in classroom creativity, Englewood Cliffs. NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  15. Urban, K. (1995). Creativity: A componential approach. Post conference China meeting of the 11th word conference on gifted and talented children. Beijing, China. August 5-8