Structural Engineering and Mechanics

Techno-Press (테크노프레스)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Multi-constrained optimization combining ARMAX with differential search for damage assessment

  • Received : 2018.11.09
  • Accepted : 2019.08.03
  • Published : 2019.12.25
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Time-series models like AR-ARX and ARMAX, provide a robust way to capture the dynamic properties of structures, and their residuals can be effectively used as features for damage detection. Even though several research papers discuss the implementation of AR-ARX and ARMAX models for damage diagnosis, they are basically been exploited so far for detecting the time instant of damage and also the spatial location of the damage. However, the inverse problem associated with damage quantification i.e. extent of damage using time series models is not been reported in the literature. In this paper, an approach to detect the extent of damage by combining the ARMAX model by formulating the inverse problem as a multi-constrained optimization problem and solving using a newly developed hybrid adaptive differential search with dynamic interaction is presented. The proposed variant of the differential search technique employs small multiple populations which perform the search independently and exchange the information with the dynamic neighborhood. The adaptive features and local search ability features are built into the algorithm in order to improve the convergence characteristics and also the overall performance of the technique. The multi-constrained optimization formulations of the inverse problem, associated with damage quantification using time series models, attempted here for the first time, can considerably improve the robustness of the search process. Numerical simulation studies have been carried out by considering three numerical examples to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed technique in robustly identifying the extent of the damage. Issues related to modeling errors and also measurement noise are also addressed in this paper.

Keywords

References

  1. Akhras, G., Asanuma, H., Balageas, D., Bannister, M., Boller, C., Buderath, M. and Cawley, P. (2008), Proceedings of the 4th European Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, Cracow, Poland. July.
  2. Balsamo, L., Betti, R. and Beigi, H. (2014), "A structural health monitoring strategy using cepstral features", J. Sound Vib., 333(19), 4526-4542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2014.04.062.
  3. Bagheri, A., Ghodrati Amiri, G., Khorasani, M. and Bakhshi, H. (2011), "Structural damage identification of plates based on modal data using 2D discrete wavelet transform", Struct. Eng. Mech., 40(1), 13-28. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2011.40.1.013.
  4. Bao, C., Hao, H., Li, Z. X. and Zhu, X. (2009), "Time-varying system identification using a newly improved HHT algorithm", Comput. Struct., 87(23-24), 1611-1623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2009.08.016.
  5. Bjorck, A. and Golub, G.H. (1973), "Numerical methods for computing angles between linear subspaces", Math. Comput., 27(123), 579-594. https://doi.org/10.1090/S0025-5718-1973-0348991-3.
  6. Carden, E.P. and Brownjohn, J.M. (2008), "ARMA modelled timeseries classification for structural health monitoring of civil infrastructure", Mech. Syst. Signal Proc., 22(2), 295-314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2007.07.003.
  7. Chakraborty, D. and Dutta, A. (2005), "Optimization of FRP composites against impact induced failure using island model parallel genetic algorithm", Compos. Sci. Technol., 65(13), 2003-2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.03.016.
  8. Cheng, J.J., Guo, H.Y. and Wang, Y.S. (2017), "Structural Nonlinear Damage Detection Method Using AR/ARCH Model", J. Struct. Stability Dynam., 17(8), https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219455417500833.
  9. Civicioglu, P. (2012), "Transforming geocentric Cartesian coordinates to geodetic coordinates by using differential search algorithm", Comput. Geosci., 46, 229-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2011.12.011.
  10. Doebling, S.W., Farrar, C.R. and Prime, M.B. (1998), "A summary review of vibration-based damage identification methods", Shock Vib. Digest, 30(2), 91-105. https://doi.org/10.1177/058310249803000201
  11. Dosiek, L. and Pierre, J. W. (2013), "Estimating electromechanical modes and mode shapes using the multichannel ARMAX model", IEEE Transactions Power Syst., 28(2), 1950-1959. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2013.2252928.
  12. Feeny, B. F. and Liang, Y. (2003), "Interpreting proper orthogonal modes of randomly excited vibration systems", J. Sound Vib., 265(5), 953-966. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-460X(02)01265-8.
  13. Hamidian, D., Salajegheh, E. and Salajegheh, J. (2018), "Damage detection technique for irregular continuum structures using wavelet transform and fuzzy inference system optimized by particle swarm optimization", Struct. Eng. Mech., 67(5), 457-464. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2018.67.5.457.
  14. Homaei, F., Shojaee, S. and Ghodrati Amiri, G. (2014), "A direct damage detection method using multiple damage localization index based on mode shapes criterion", Struct. Eng. Mech., 49(2), 183-202. http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/sem.2014.49.2.183.
  15. Hooke, R. and Jeeves, T. A. (1961), "'Direct Search' Solution of Numerical and Statistical Problems", JACM, 8(2), 212-229. https://doi.org/10.1145/321062.321069.
  16. Hore, S., Chatterjee, S., Sarkar, S., Dey, N., Ashour, A. S., Balas- Timar, D. and Balas, V. E. (2016), "Neural-based prediction of structural failure of multistoried RC buildings", Struct. Eng. Mech., 58(3), 459-473. http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/sem.2016.58.3.459.
  17. Huynh, D., He, J. and Tran, D. (2005), "Damage location vector: A non-destructive structural damage detection technique", Comp. Struct., 83(28-30) ,2353-2367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2005.03.029.
  18. Jayalakshmi, V., Lakshmi, K. and Rao, A.R.M. (2018), "Dynamic force reconstruction techniques from incomplete measurements", J. Vib. Control, 24(22), 5321-5344. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077546317752709.
  19. Johnson, D.S. and McGeoch, L.A. (1997), "The travelling salesman problem: A case study in local optimization", Local Search in Combinatorial Optimization, Wiley, London, United Kingdom. 215-310.
  20. Kammer, D.C. (2005), "Sensor Set Expansion for Modal Vibration Testing", Mech. Syst. Signal Process, 19(4), 700-713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2004.06.003.
  21. Koh, C. G. and Perry, M. J. (2009), Structural Identification and Damage Detection using Genetic Algorithms: Structures and Infrastructures Book Series, CRC Press, New Jersey, USA. 6.
  22. Laier, J.E. and Morales, J.D. (2009), "Improved genetic algorithm for structural damage detection", Computational Structural Engineering, Proceedings of the International Symposium on Computational Structural Engineering, Shanghai, China, June. 833-839. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2822-8_91.
  23. Lakshmi, K. and Rama Mohan Rao, A. (2014), "A robust damagedetection technique with environmental variability combining time-series models with principal components", Nondestructive Testing Evaluation, 29(4), 357-376. https://doi.org/10.1080/10589759.2014.949709.
  24. Lakshmi, K. and Rama Mohan Rao, A. (2015), "Damage identification technique based on time series models for LANL and ASCE benchmark structures", Insight-Non-Destructive Testing and Condition Monitoring, 57(10), 580-588. https://doi.org/10.1784/insi.2015.57.10.580.
  25. Lakshmi, K. and Rao, A.R.M. (2016), "Structural damage detection using ARMAX time series models and cepstral distances", Sadhana, 41(9), 1081-1097. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-016-0534-3.
  26. Li, Y. Y. and Chen, Y. (2013), "A review on recent development of vibration-based structural robust damage detection", Struct. Eng. Mech., 45(2), 159-168. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2013.45.2.159.
  27. Liu, J., Wu, C., Wu, G. and Wang, X. (2015), "A novel differential search algorithm and applications for structure design", Appl. Math. Comput., 268, 246-269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2015.06.036.
  28. Nobahari, M. and Seyedpoor, S.M. (2013), "An efficient method for structural damage localization based on the concepts of flexibility matrix and strain energy of a structure", Struct. Eng. Mech., 46(2), 231-244. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2013.46.2.231.
  29. Oppenheim, A. V. and Schafer, R. W. (1975), "Digital filter design techniques", Digital Signal Processing, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, USA. 585.
  30. Rao, A.R.M. and Ganesh, A. (2008), "Optimal sensor placement techniques for system identification and health monitoring of civil structures", J. Smart Struct. Syst., 4(4), 465-492. https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2008.4.4.465
  31. Rao, A.R.M. and Lakshmi, K. (2011), "Discrete hybrid PSO algorithm for design of laminate composites with multiple objectives", J. Reinforced Plastics Compos., 30(20), 1703-1727. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731684411417198.
  32. Rao, AR.M., Rao, T.V.S.R.A. and Dattaguru, B. (2004), "Generating optimised partitions for parallel finite element computations employing float-encoded genetic algorithms", Comput. Model. Eng. Sci., 5(3), 213-234.
  33. Rao, A.R.M., Lakshmi, K. and Venkatachalam, D. (2012), "Damage diagnostic technique for structural health monitoring using POD and self-adaptive differential evolution algorithm", Comp. Struct., 106, 228-244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2012.05.009.
  34. Rao, A.R.M. and Lakshmi, K. (2012), "Optimal design of stiffened laminate composite cylinder using a hybrid SFL algorithm", J. Compos. Mater., 46(24), 3031-3055. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021998311435674.
  35. Rao, A.R.M., Lakshmi, K. and S.K. Kumar. (2015), "Detection of delamination in laminated composites with limited measurements combining PCA and dynamic QPSO", Adv. Eng. Software, 86, 85-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2015.04.005.
  36. Seyedpoor, S.M. and Montazer, M.A. (2016), "A damage identification method for truss structures using a flexibility-based damage probability index and differential evolution algorithm", Inverse Problems Sci. Eng., 24(8), 1303-1322. https://doi.org/10.1080/17415977.2015.1101761.
  37. Sohn, H. and Farrar, C.R. (2001), "Damage diagnosis using time series analysis of vibration signals", Smart Mater. Struct., 10(3), 446. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/10/3/304.
  38. Sohn, H., Farrar, C.R., Hemez, F. M., Shunk, D.D., Stinemates, D. W., Nadler, B.R. and Czarnecki, J.J. (2003), "A review of structural health monitoring literature: 1996-2001", Los Alamos National Laboratory, USA.
  39. Tang, H., Suqi, L., Chunfeng, W and Songtao, X. (2018), "Experimental Verification of the Statistical Time-Series Methods for Diagnosing Wind Turbine Blades Damage", J. Struct. Stability Dynam., 19(1), https://doi.org/10.1142/S021945541940008X.
  40. Worden, K. and Farrar, C.R. (2007), "Theme issue: Structural health monitoring", Philosophical Transactions Royal Soc. A, 365(1861), 299-632. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2006.1926
  41. Yu, L. and Zhu, J. H. (2015), "Nonlinear damage detection using higher statistical moments of structural responses", Struct. Eng. Mech., 54(2), 221-237. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2015.54.2.221.
  42. Zheng, H. and Mita, A. (2008), "Damage indicator defined as the distance between ARMA models for structural health monitoring", Struct. Control Health Monitor., 15(7), 992-1005. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.235.