농촌계획 (Journal of Korean Society of Rural Planning)

  • 제25권4호
  • /
  • Pages.65-76
  • /
  • 2019
  • /
  • 1225-8857(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-9493(eISSN)
한국농촌계획학회 (Korean Society of Rural Planning)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

귀농·귀촌인의 소득만족도와 자연환경만족도 비교 분석

Life Satisfaction of Urban-to-Rural Migrants in South Korea - Income vs. Nature -

  • 정진화 (서울대학교 농경제사회학부, 농업생명과학연구원) ;
  • 김새봄 (서울대학교 농경제사회학부)
  • Jung, Jin Hwa (Dept. of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, Research Institute for Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Sae Bom (Dept. of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, Seoul National University)
  • 투고 : 2019.10.18
  • 심사 : 2019.11.20
  • 발행 : 2019.11.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

농촌인구의 급격한 감소와 고령화 속에서 농촌의 지속가능성을 위한 방안으로 귀농·귀촌의 확대가 부각되고 있다. 본 연구는 귀농·귀촌인의 생활만족도 결정요인을 분석함으로써 도시민의 농촌 이주와 성공적인 정착을 촉진하기 위한 정책적 시사점을 제공하고자 한다. 본 연구는 특히 귀농·귀촌의 주요 동기가 소득이나 농촌의 자연환경이라는 점에서, 생활만족도를 자연환경만족도와 소득만족도로 구분하여 비교 분석하는 데 목적이 있다. 분석에는 순서형 로짓모형과 일반화 로짓모형을 사용하였고, 분석자료는 2016년 「귀농귀촌실태조사」 원자료이다. 분석결과, 귀농·귀촌인의 자연환경만족도는 상당히 높으나 소득만족도는 보통 수준에 미치지 못하였다. 귀농·귀촌의 이유가 자연환경이거나, 귀농·귀촌 시 가족의 지지가 있었거나, 귀농·귀촌 이후 주변 이웃들과 좋은 관계를 유지하거나, 지자체로부터 귀농·귀촌 지원을 받은 경우, 귀농·귀촌인의 소득만족도와 자연환경만족도가 모두 높았다. 이러한 공통적인 요인 이외에 귀농·귀촌인의 소득만족도와 자연환경만족도에 영향을 미치는 요인은 뚜렷한 차이를 보였다. 소득만족도는 현재 가구소득이나 귀농·귀촌 전·후 소득 변화와 같은 경제적 요인에 의해 영향을 받으나, 자연환경만족도는 귀농·귀촌 시 배우자의 동행 여부나 지역사회 참여와 같은 사회적 요인에 의해 주로 영향을 받는 것으로 나타났다.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Akay, A., Giulietti, C., Robalino, J. D., & Zimmermann, K. F. (2014). Remittances and well-being among rural-to-urban migrants in China. Review of Economics of the Household, 12(3), 517-546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11150-013-9208-7
  2. Barcus, H. (2004). Urban-rural migration in the USA: An analysis of residential satisfaction. Regional Studies, 38(6), 643-657. https://doi.org/10.1080/003434042000240950
  3. De Jong, G. F., Chamratrithirong, A., & Tran, Q.-G. (2002). For better, for worse: Life satisfaction consequences of migration. The International Migration Review, 36(3), 838-863. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7379.2002.tb00106.x
  4. Hagihara, K., & Hagihara, Y. (1991). The role of intergovernmental grants in underpopulated regions. Regional Studies, 25(2), 163-172. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343409112331346377
  5. Hendriks, M., Ludwigs, K., & Veenhoven, R. (2016). Why are locals happier than internal migrants? The role of daily life. Social Indicators Research, 125(2), 481-508. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-014-0856-7
  6. Hong, S.-K., Kim, J.-H., Kim, J,-J., Chang, C.-Y., and Tae, Y.-L. (2013). Life satisfaction of city dwellers and migrators to the rural areas. Journal of Korean Society of Rural Planning, 19(4), 237-248. (https://doi.org/10.7851/ksrp.2014.20.1.105)
  7. Hwang, J. I., Choi, Y. J., Cho, H. M., & Yoon, S. D. (2011). Rural migrants' community participation and relationship with rural life satisfaction. Journal of Agricultural Extension & Community Development, 18(4), 729-764. https://doi.org/10.12653/JECD.2011.18.4.729
  8. Jacob, J. C., & Brinkerhoff, M. B. (1997). Values, performance and subjective well-being in the sustainability movement: An elaboration of multiple discrepancies theory. Social Indicators Research, 42(2), 171-204. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006858618686
  9. Jacob, J. C., & Brinkerhoff, M. B. (1999). Mindfulness and subjective well-being in the sustainability movement: A further elaboration of multiple discrepancies theory. Social Indicators Research, 46(3), 341-368. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006941403481
  10. Jung, J. H., & Kim, S. B. (2017). Farmer's age, technology adoption, and income: A case of the elderly-friendly technology in South Korea. Korean Journal of Agricultural Economics, 58(3), 215-235.
  11. Jung, J. H., Roh, J.-S., Jang, W., Kim, S. B., Yoon, K. Y., & Kim, J. (2014). Regional analysis of the migration patterns of returning farmers. Journal of Korean Society of Rural Planning, 20(4), 221-232. (https://doi.org/10.7851/ksrp.2014.20.1.105)
  12. Jung, J. H., Roh, J.-S., Park, H., Lim, D., & Kim, D. (2015). Successful settlement of returning farmers : Obstacles and strategies. Korean Journal of Agricultural Management and Policy, 42(4), 905-930.
  13. Kim, J. (2014). A qualitative inquiry on the social and economic activities by immigrant farm households. Journal of Agricultural Extension & Community Development, 21(3), 53-89. https://doi.org/10.12653/jecd.2014.21.3.0053
  14. Kim, J., & Kim, J. (2017). Prospect on returning to farming and rural village by delphi method. Journal of Agricultural Extension & Community Development, 24(1), 33-48. https://doi.org/10.12653/jecd.2017.24.1.0033
  15. Kim, S.-H., & Seo, J.-W. (2014). An analysis of settlement motivation and life satisfaction of return farmers on mountain village. Journal of Korean Society of Rural Planning, 20(1), 105-113. (https://doi.org/10.7851/ksrp.2014.20.1.105)
  16. Knight, J., & Gunatilaka, R. (2010). Great expectations? The subjective well-being of rural-urban migrants in China. World Development, 38(1), 113-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.03.002
  17. Korea Agency of Education, Promotion and Information Service in Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries and Gallup Korea. (2016). 2016 National survey of urbanto- rural migration report.
  18. Lee, S. (2008). Analysis of satisfaction of returns to the farm with the region society and regional dwellers in the Gyeongbuk province. Korean Journal of Agricultural Management and Policy, 35(3), 551-565.
  19. Long, J. S. (1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Thousand Oaks, CA, US: Sage Publications, Inc.
  20. Long, J. S., & Freese, J. (2006). Regression models for categorical dependent variables using Stata (Second Ed.). Texas: Stata press.
  21. Luhmann, M., Hofmann, W., Eid, M., & Lucas, R. E. (2012). Subjective well-being and adaptation to life events: A meta-analysis on differences between cognitive and affective well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(3), 592-615. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025948
  22. Lundholm, E., & Malmberg, G. (2006). Gains and losses, outcomes of interregional migration in the five Nordic countries. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 88(1), 35-48.
  23. Ma, S.-J., Park, D.-S., Park, S., Choi, Y. J., Choi, Y., & Nam, K.-C. (2014). Long-term follow-up survey of urban-to-rural migration: First year. Naju: Korea Rural Economic Institute.
  24. Melzer, S. M. (2011). Does migration make you happy? The influence of migration on subjective well-being. Journal of Social Research and Policy, 2(2), 73-92.
  25. Mulcahy, K., & Kollamparambil, U. (2016). The impact of rural-urban migration on subjective well-being in South Africa. The Journal of Development Studies, 52(9), 1357-1371. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2016.1171844
  26. Nowok, B., van Ham, M., Findlay, A. M., & Gayle, V. (2013). Does migration make you happy? A longitudinal study of internal migration and subjective well-being. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 45(4), 986-1002. https://doi.org/10.1068/a45287
  27. Park, G.-J., Yoon, S.-D., & Kang, K.-H. (2006). Factors effecting on the rural life satisfaction of returners to the farm after retirement. Journal of Korean Society of Rural Planning, 12(4), 63-76.
  28. Park, J.-W., Lee, T., & An, D. (2018). An analysis of the transformation of over-depopulated rural villages. Journal of Korean Society of Rural Planning, 24(2), 79-89. (https://doi.org/10.7851/Ksrp.2018.24.2.079).
  29. Park, S.-B. (2013). The integrative impact-relationship between the rural life satisfaction of farming returnees and its factors. Korean Society and Public Administration, 24(3), 253-277.
  30. Roh, J.-S., Jung, J. H., & Jeon, J. Y. (2013). Returning farmers and the aging of farm households: Prospects of changes in rural population by their influx. Journal of Korean Society of Rural Planning, 19(4), 203-212. (http://dx.doi.org/10.7851/ksrp.2013.19.4.203)
  31. Sjaastad, L. A. (1962). The costs and returns of human migration. Journal of Political Economy, 70(5), 80-93. https://doi.org/10.1086/258726
  32. Statistics Korea, KOSIS (2010, 2017). Population census(http://kosis.kr/statHtml/statHtml.do?orgId=101&tblId=DT_1IN1002&conn_path=I3, http://kosis.kr/statHtml/ statHtml.do?orgId=101&tblId=DT_1IN1502&conn_pa th=I3). Accessed on 31 December 2018.
  33. Statistics Korea, KOSIS (2017). Statistics of returned farmers & fishermen and migrators to rural regions (http://kosis.kr/statHtml/statHtml.do?orgId=101&tblId=DT_1A02001&conn_path=I3, http://kosis.kr/statHtml/statHtml.do?orgId=101&tblId=DT_1A02014&conn_path=I3). Accessed on 31 December 2018.
  34. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, & Population Division. (2018). World urbanization prospect: The 2018 revision, Online edition(http://esa.un.org/unpd/wup/Download/). Accessed on 26 June 2018.