한국지리정보학회지 (Journal of the Korean Association of Geographic Information Studies)

  • 제22권4호
  • /
  • Pages.102-115
  • /
  • 2019
  • /
  • 1226-9719(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-6952(eISSN)
한국지리정보학회 (The Korean Association of Geographic Information Studies)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

TOPSIS을 적용한 가뭄취약성 평가 방법에 관한 연구

An Approach to Drought Vulnerability Assessment using TOPSIS Method

  • 이창우 (이엔지소프트) ;
  • 신형진 (한국농어촌공사 농어촌연구원) ;
  • 권민성 (환경부 영산강홍수통제소) ;
  • 이규민 (성균관대학교 건설환경연구소) ;
  • 남상혁 (이엔지소프트) ;
  • 강문성 (한국농어촌공사 농어촌연구원)
  • 투고 : 2019.11.11
  • 심사 : 2019.12.19
  • 발행 : 2019.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구에서는 가뭄과 연관되는 다양한 관련 요인을 포함한 가뭄취약성 평가방안을 수립하고 이를 적용하는 것을 목표로 하였다. 평가기법은 평가인자와 가중치 선정, 평가자료 데이터베이스 구축, 평가자료와 가중치를 조합한 평가의 세 단계로 구성되었으며 평가인자 및 가중치 선정에는 Delphi 조사기법을 적용하고 평가기법으로는 최근 널리 적용되고 있는 MCDM(Multi-Criteria Decision Making) 방법인 TOPSIS(Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) 기법을 활용하였다. 수립한 가뭄취약성 평가방안을 2016년 3월부터 2019년 9월까지 우리나라 시군구 행정구역을 대상으로 적용하여 결과를 제시하였다. 평가 결과, 충청북도, 경상남도, 전라남도에 가뭄 취약지역이 다수 도출 되어 이들 지역에 대한 가뭄 대응 방안 수립이 필요한 것으로 분석되었다.

This study aims to establish and apply a drought vulnerability assessment plan including various factors related to drought. The evaluation technique consisted of three stages: evaluation factor and weight selection, evaluation data database construction, evaluation data and weight combination, and Delphi investigation method was applied to evaluation factor and weight selection. As the evaluation method, the TOPSIS method, which is a widely used MCDM method, was used. The results of the drought vulnerability assessment were applied to the administrative districts of Sigun-gu, Korea from March 2016 to September 2019. As a result of the evaluation, drought vulnerable areas were identified in Chungcheongbuk-do, Gyeongsangnam-do, and Jeollanam-do, and it was analyzed that it is necessary to establish drought response plans for these areas.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Afshar, A., M.A. Marino, M. Saadatpour and A. Afsahr. 2011. Fuzzy TOPSIS multi-criteria decision analysis applied to Karun reservoirs system. Water Resources Management 25(2):545-563. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-010-9713-x
  2. Babaei, H., S. Araghinejad and A. Hoorfar. 2013. Developing a new method for spatial assessment of drought vulnerability (case study: Zayandeh-Rood river basin in Iran). Water and Environment Journal 27:50-57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-6593.2012.00326.x
  3. Chen, S.J. and C.L. Hwang. 1992. Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making: method and application. Lecture notes in economics and mathematical systems. 375, Springer, New York.
  4. Chu, T.C. 2002. Selecting plant location via a fuzzy TOPSIS approach. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Tech. 20:859-864. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001700200227
  5. Fan, G., Y. Zhang, Y. He and K. Wang. 2017. Risk assessment of drought in the Yangtze river delta based on natural disaster risk theory. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society 2017:Article ID 5682180.
  6. Feng, C.M. and R.T. Wang. 2000. Performance evaluation for airlines including the consideration of financial ratios. Journal of Air Transport Management 6(3):133-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-6997(00)00003-X
  7. Hwang, C.L. and K. Yoon. 1981. Multiple attributes decision-making methods and applications, Springer, Heidelberg.
  8. Hyde, K.M., H.R. Maier and C.B. Colby. 2005. A distancebased uncertainty analysis approach to multi-criteria decision analysis for water resource decision making. Journal of Environmental Management 77(4):278-290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.06.011
  9. Jun, K.S., E.S. Chung, J.Y. Sung and K.S. Lee. 2011. Development of spatial water resources vulnerability index considering climate change impacts. Sci. Tot. Environ. 409(24):5228-5242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.08.027
  10. Jolson, M.A. 1978. Marketing Management: integrated Text, Readings and Cases. Collier Macmillan International, London. 340.
  11. Kaufmann, A. and M.M. Gupta. 1991. Introduction to fuzzy arithmetic: theory and application. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
  12. Kheireldin, K. and H. Fahmy. 2001. Multi-Criteria Approach for evaluating long term water strategies. Water International 26(4):527-535. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060108686953
  13. Larichev, O.I. and H.M. Moshkovich. 1995. ZAPROS-LM-A method and system for ordering multiattribute alternatives. European Journal of Operational Research 82(3):503-521. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(93)E0143-L
  14. Lee, G., K.S. Jun and E.S. Chung. 2014. Robust spatial flood vulnerability assessment for Han River using fuzzy TOPSIS with ${\alpha}$ - level sets. Expert Systems with Applications 41:644-654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2013.07.089
  15. Maliva, R. and T. Missimer. 2012. Arid lands water evaluation and management. Springer Science and Business Media.
  16. Moshkovich, H.M., R.E. Schellenberger and D.L. Olson. 1998. Data influences the result more than preferences: some lessons from implementation of multiattribute techniques in a real decision task. Decision Support Systems 22(1):73-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9236(97)00024-9
  17. Okoli, C. and S.D. Pawlowski. 2004. The Delphi method as a research Tool: an example, design considerations and applications. Information and Management 42(1):15-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2003.11.002
  18. Rios Insua, D. 1990. Sensitivity analysis in multi-objective decision making, Springer Verlag, Berlin.
  19. Shahid, S. and H. Behrawan. 2008. Drought risk assessment in the western part of bangladesh. Natural Hazards 46(3):391-413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-007-9191-5
  20. Sheffield, J., E.F. Wood and M.L. Roderick. 2012. Little change in global drought over the past 60 years. Nature 491(7424):435-438. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11575
  21. Somerville, J.A. 2007. Critical factors affecting the meaning assessment of student learning outcomes: a Delphi study of the opinions of community college personnel. Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR. ph.D degree.
  22. Stokes, B., R. Wike and J. Carle. 2015. Global concern about climate change. broad support for limiting emissions. Pew Research Center 5.
  23. Wilhite, D.A. and M.H. Glantz. 1985. Understanding: the drought phenomenon: the role of definitions. Water International 10(3):111-120. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508068508686328
  24. WMO. 2009. Experts agree on a universal drought index to cope with climate risks. WMO Press Release No. 872.
  25. Wolters, W.T.M. and B. Mareschal. 1995. Novel types of sensitivity analysis for additive MCDM methods. European Journal of Operational Research 81(2):281-290. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(93)E0343-V
  26. Yang, T.C., C. Chen, C.M. Kuo, H.W. Tseng and P.S. Yu. 2012. Drought risk assessments of water resources systems under climate change: a case study in Southern Taiwan. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss. 9:12395-12433. https://doi.org/10.5194/hessd-9-12395-2012

피인용 문헌

  1. 필지단위 관개용수 공급에 따른 농업가뭄진단 평가 vol.63, pp.4, 2019, https://doi.org/10.5389/ksae.2021.63.4.001