대한치과기공학회지 (Journal of Technologic Dentistry)

  • 제41권4호
  • /
  • Pages.287-293
  • /
  • 2019
  • /
  • 1229-3954(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-5218(eISSN)
대한치과기공학회 (Korean Academy of Dental Technology)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

3D 인쇄방법으로 제작된 치과용 다이 모델의 정확도 평가연구

A study on the accuracy evaluation of dental die models manufactured by 3D printing method

  • 장연 (진주보건대학교 치기공과)
  • Jang, Yeon (Department of Dental Technology, Jinju Health College)
  • 투고 : 2019.11.01
  • 심사 : 2019.11.29
  • 발행 : 2019.12.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Purpose: To evaluate the accuracy of the 3D printed die models and to investigate its clinical applicability. Methods: Stone die models were fabricated from conventional impressions(stone die model; SDM, n=7). 3D virtual models obtained from the digital impressions were manufactured as a 3D printed die models using a 3D printer(3D printed die models;3DM, n=7). Reference model, stone die models and 3D printed die models were scanned with a reference scanner. All dies model dataset were superimposed with the reference model file by the "Best fit alignment" method using 3D analysis software. Statistical analysis was performed using the independent t-test and 2-way ANOVA (α=.05). Results: The RMS value of the 3D printed die model was significantly larger than the RMS value of the stone die model (P<.001). As a result of 2-way ANOVA, significant differences were found between the model group (P<.001) and the part (P<.001), and their interaction effects (P<.001). Conclusion: The 3D printed die model showed lower accuracy than the stone die model. Therefore, it is necessary to further improve the performance of 3D printer in order to apply the 3D printed model in prosthodontics.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Cho SH, Schaefer O, Thompson GA, Guentsch A. Comparison of accuracy and reproducibility of casts made by digital and conventional methods. J Prosthet Dent, 113, 310-315, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.09.027
  2. Choi SH, Samavedam S. Modelling and optimisation of rapid prototyping. Comput Ind, 47, 39-53, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-3615(01)00140-3
  3. Dawood A, Marti BM, Sauret-Jackson V, Dawood A. 3D printing in dentistry. Br Dent J, 216, 521-529, 2015.
  4. Ender A, Attin T, Mehl A. In vivo precision of conventional and digital methods of obtaining complete-arch dental impressions. J Prosthet Dent, 115, 313-320, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.09.011
  5. ISO 5725-1. Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results-Part 1: General principles and definitions. Geneva, Switzerland. International Organization for Standardization. 1994.
  6. Lee SJ, Gallucci GO. Digital vs. conventional implant impressions: efficiency outcomes. Clin Oral Implants Res, 24, 111-115, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02430.x
  7. Liu Q, Leu MC, Schmitt SM. Rapid prototyping in dentistry: technology and application. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 29, 317-335, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-005-2523-2
  8. Patzelt SB, Bishti S, Stampf S, Att W. Accuracy of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing-generated dental casts based on intraoral scanner data. J Am Dent Assoc, 145, 1133-1140, 2014. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.2014.87
  9. Schaefer O, Kuepper H, Thompson GA, Cachovan G, Hefti AF, Guentsch A. Effect of CNCmilling on the marginal and internal fit of dental ceramics: a pilot study. Dent Mater, 29, 851-858, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2013.04.018
  10. Shim JS, Lee JS, Lee JY, Choi YJ, Shin SW, Ryu JJ. Effect of software version and parameter settings on the marginal and internal adaptation of crowns fabricated with the CAD/CAM system. J Appl Oral Sci, 23, 515-522, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-775720150081
  11. Sim JY, Jang Y, Kim WC, Kim HY, Lee DH, Kim JH. Comparing the accuracy (trueness and precision) of models of fixed dental prostheses fabricated by digital and conventional workflows. J Prosthodont Res, 63(1), 25-30, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2018.02.002
  12. Sun J, Zhang FQ. The application of rapid prototyping in prosthodontics. J Prosthodont, 21, 641-644, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2012.00888.x
  13. Ueda K, Beuer F, Stimmelmayr M, Erdelt K, Keul C, Guth JF. Fit of 4-unit FDPs from CoCr and zirconia after conventional and digital impressions. Clin Oral Investig ,20, 283-289, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-015-1513-5
  14. van Noort R. The future of dental devices is digital. Dent Mater, 28, 3-12, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.10.014
  15. Yau HT, Yang TJ, Lin YK. Comparison of 3-D printing and 5-axis milling for the production of dental e-models from intraoral scanning. Comput Aided Des Appl, 13, 32-38, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1080/16864360.2015.1059186
  16. Zhou JG, Herscovici D, Chen CC. Parametric process optimization to improve the accuracy of rapid prototyped stereolithography parts. Int J Mach Tools Manuf, 40, 363-379, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0890-6955(99)00068-1