Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia

World Association for Triple Helix and Future Strategy Studies (세계트리플헬릭스미래전략학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Techno Populism and Algorithmic Manipulation of News in South Korea

  • Yoon, Sunny (Media and Communication, Hanyang University)
  • Published : 2019.12.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The current Moon Jai-in administration in South Korea is facing serious challenges as a result of a scandal involving the manipulation of news online. Staff in Moon's camp are suspected of manipulating public opinion by creating millions of fake news comments online, contributing to Moon being elected president. This South Korean political scandal raises a number of theoretical issues with regard to new platform technologies and media manipulation. First, the incident exposes the technological limits of blocking manipulation of the news, partly because of the nature of social media and partly because of the nature of contemporary technology. Contemporary social media is often monopolistic in nature; with the majority of people are using the same platforms, and hence it is likely that they will be subject to forms of media manipulation. Second, the Korean case of news manipulation demonstrates a unique cultural aspect of Korean society. News comments and readers' replies have become a major channel of alternative news in Korea. This phenomenon is often designated as "reply journalism," since people are interested in reading the news replies of ordinary readers equally to reading news reports themselves. News replies are considered indicators of public opinion and are seen as affecting trias politica in Korean society. Third, the Korean incident of news manipulation implicates a new form of populism in the 21st century and the nature of democratic participation. This article aims to explicate key issues in media manipulation by including wider technological, cultural, and political aspects in the South Korean news media context.

Keywords

References

  1. Allcott, H., & Gentzkou, M. (2017). Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. Journal of economic perspectives, 3 (2), 211-236. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.31.2.211
  2. Bakir, V., & McStay, A. (2018). Fake news and the economy of emotions. Digital Journalism, 6(2), 154-175. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1345645
  3. Balmas, M. (2014). When Fake News Becomes Real: Combined Exposure to Multiple News Sources and Political Attitudes of Inefficacy, Alienation, and Cynicism. Communication Research, 41, 430-454. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650212453600
  4. Ben, N. (2019). Measuring traffic manipulation on Twitter. Project on computational propaganda, 35-40.
  5. Bevan, C., & Cowan, D. (2016). Uses of Macro Social Theory: A Social Housing Case Study. Modern Law Review, 79 (1), 76-101. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12167
  6. Bradshaw, S., Neudert, L., & Howard, N. (2019). Government Responses to Malicious Use of Social Media. Project on Computational Propaganda. https://comprop.oii.ox.ac.uk/research/government-responses/
  7. Carlson, M. (2018). Automating judgment? Algorithmic judgment, news knowledge, and journalistic professionalism. New media & Society, 20(5), 1755–1772. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817706684
  8. Choi, S., & Kim, G. (2010). Internal Structure of the Korean Social Face (Chemyon, 體面). Korean Psychology, 12 (1), 185-198.
  9. Conline, L., & Roberts, C. (2016). Presence of online reader comments lowers news site credibility. Newspaper Research Journal, 37(4), 365-376. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739532916677056
  10. Chung, J., & Park, N. (2016). The effect of biased perception toward others’ comments on perceived public opinion. Korean Journal of Journalism & Communication Studies, 60(2), 95-126.
  11. Diakopoulos, N., & Koliska, M. (2017). Algorithmic Transparency in the News Media. Digital Journalism, 5 (7), 809-828. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2016.1208053
  12. Egelhofer, J., & Lecheler, S. (2019). Fake news as a two dimensional phenomenon: a framework and research agenda, Annals of the International Communication Association, 43(2), 97-116. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2019.1602782
  13. Figenschou, T., & Ihlebæk, K. (2018). Challenging journalistic authority: Media criticism in far-right alternative media. Journalism Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2018.1500868
  14. Frenda, S., & Nichols, L. (2011). Current issues and advances in misinformation research, Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20 (2011), 20-23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721410396620
  15. Guess, A., Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2017). "You're Fake News!" The 2017 Poynter Media Trust Survey. https://poyntercdn.blob.core.windows.net/files/PoynterMediaTrustSurvey2017.pdf
  16. Heo, J., Park, W., & Kim, S. (2012). Conceptualization of Nunchi. Studies in Humanities, 13, 557-581.
  17. Horne, B., & Adali, S. (2017). This just in: Fake news packs a lot in title, uses simpler, repetitive content in text body, more similar to satire than real news. The 2nd International Workshop on News and Public Opinion at ICWSM. https://arxiv.org/abs/1703.09398
  18. Houston, J. B., Hansen, G. J., & Nisbett, G. S. (2011). Influence of user comments on perceptions of media bias and third-person effect in online news. Electronic News, 5(2), 79-92. https://doi.org/10.1177/1931243111407618
  19. Hwang, J., & Kil, Y. (2018, April 23) Worldwide negative effect of replies, what they do with it in other countries? Hangyerae.
  20. Hwang, Y., & Kwon, O. (2017). A study on the conceptualization and regulation measures on fake news. Journalism & Law, 16 (1), 53-101. https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7919-2017-16-4-53-58
  21. Jang, Y., & Lee, E. (2017). Effects of other’s comments and intervention of site managers. Journal of Social Science, 10, 377-421.
  22. Jong, C. (2018, Aug 6). Naver should be classified as monopoly. Media Today.
  23. Jong, J. (2018, Jul 22). Manipulating 11,310,000 in a month. Breaking in Naver by Druking KingCrab 2. Joongang Daily.
  24. Jong, J., & Park, T. (2018, Jul 6). Naver let Macro manipulate. Joongang Daily.
  25. Karlova, N. A., & Fisher, K. E. (2013). A social diffusion model of misinformation and disinformation for understanding human information behaviour. Information Research, 18, 1-17.
  26. Kang, E. (2019, Aug 30). Supporting vs impeaching Chokook. Debates on search ranking. News 1.
  27. Kang, I. (2018, May 9). No news on the first page? New policy of Naver mobile. IT Donga.
  28. KDC Newsroom (2018, April 25). Naver new policy of replies. Korea Economy Daily.
  29. Kim, K. (2018, March 13). Naver, the prime search engine, what would be the rate of user satisfaction? Joongang Daily.
  30. Kim, S. (2017, Nov 29). Readers view news on the portal sites. No Cut News.
  31. Kim, Y. (2015). Exploring the effects of source credibility and others' comments on online news evaluation. Electronic News. 9 (3),160-176. https://doi.org/10.1177/1931243115593318
  32. Koh, H. (2018, Dec. 28). Special counsels demand 5-year prison for Kim Kyongsu. Hangyerae.
  33. Korea Press Foundation (2016). 2016 Annual survey of media users. Seoul, Korea: Korea Press Foundation.
  34. Kwak, S (2019, Sep. 9). Their Chokook, Their league only. Weekly Chosun.
  35. Kweon, S., & Kim, I. (2008). A study of the relationship between perception and activities in the news replies. Journalism and Information, 42, 45-78.
  36. Lazer, D. M., Baum, M. A., Benkler, Y., Berinsky, A. J., Greenhill, K. M., Menczer, F., Metzger, M. J., Nyhan, B., Pennycook, G., Rothschild, D., & Schudson, M. (2018). The science of fake news. Science, 359(6380), 1094-1096. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao2998
  37. Lee, D., Lee, S., & Lee, Y. (2018, Oct 26). Naver at the hearing "no fundamental method to block manipulation of replies". Maeil Economy Daily.
  38. Lee, E. (2011). Perceived bias or biased perception? Effects of others’ comments, perceived opinion climate, and issue involvement on perceived news slant. Korean Journal of Journalism & Communication Studies, 55(3), 179-198.
  39. Lee, G., & Koh, H. (2010). Who controls newspapers' political perspectives?: Source transparency affiliations in Korean news articles about US beef imports. Asian Journal of Communication, 20 (4), 404-422. https://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2010.496859
  40. Lee, Y. (2019, Jan.30) Report, the case of Druking. News 1.
  41. Mustafaraj, E., & Metaxas, P. (2017). The fake news spreading plague: Was it preventable? http://arxiv.org/abs/1703.06988
  42. McNair, B. (2017). Fake news: Falsehood, fabrication and fantasy in journalism. New York: Routledge.
  43. Napoli, P. (2015). Social media and the public interest. Telecommunication Policy, 39, 751-760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2014.12.003
  44. Nielson, C. (2014). Coproduction or cohabitation: are anonymous online comments on newspaper websites shaping news contents? New Media & Society, 16 (3), 470-487. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813487958
  45. Ock, H. (2019, April 17). Moon's confidant suspected of opinion rigging released on bail. Korea Herald.
  46. Oh, H. (2018, Oct. 31). Naver damaged brand value because of Druking incidence. Maeil Economy Daily.
  47. Park, J., & Kim, W. (2018, May 8). The new reply policy of Naver can be broken up in 30 minutes. Hangyerae.
  48. Ruiz, C., Domingo, D., & Lluis Mico, J. (2011). Public sphere 2.0? The democratic qualities of citizen debates in online newspapers. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 16(4), 463-487. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161211415849
  49. Ryoo, J. (2013, Aug 1). History of NHN, start of naver.com in 1999, and became the first runner of search engine in 2000. NSP Communication.
  50. Samuel, C., W., & Douglas R. G. (2017). Computational Propaganda in the United States of America: Manufacturing Consensus Online. Working paper, 2017.5. Oxford, UK: Project on Computational Propaganda. comprop.oii.ox.ac.uk.
  51. Sherrick, B., & Hoewe, J. (2018). The effect of explicit online comment moderation. New Media & Society, 20 (2), 453-474. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816662477
  52. Shim, D. (2006). Hybridity and the rise of Korean popular culture in Asia. Media, Culture & Society, 28 (1), 25-44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443706059278
  53. Shin, A. Et al. (2019, May 4). The ticket price of BTS concert, 560 man Won ($ 5,0000 USD, added by the author)? Donga Daily.
  54. Shu, K., Sliva, A., Wang, S., Tang, J., & Liu, H. (2017). Fake news detection on social media: A data mining perspective. SIGKDD Explor. Newsl., 19, 22-36. https://doi.org/10.1145/3137597.3137600
  55. Tandoc Jr., C. E., Lim, Z. W., & Ling, R. (2018). Defining "Fake News", Digital Journalism, 6:2, 137-153. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1360143
  56. Waisbord, S. (2018). Truth is what happens to news: On journalism, fake news, and post-truth. Journalism Studies, 19(3),1866-1878. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2018.1492881
  57. Yoon, S. (2014). Asian Modernization and Mediatization of Religion. Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies, 13 (39), 1-19.

Cited by

  1. The Influence of SNS and Podcasts on the Political Participation of Korean Youth: A Case Study of the Candle Light Rallies and the 2017 Impeachment of the Korean President vol.20, pp.2, 2019, https://doi.org/10.17477/jcea.2021.20.2.001