ETRI Journal

Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute (한국전자통신연구원)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Energy-balance node-selection algorithm for heterogeneous wireless sensor networks

  • Khan, Imran (Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Engineering & Technology) ;
  • Singh, Dhananjay (Department of Electronics Engineering, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies)
  • Received : 2017.12.30
  • Accepted : 2018.04.09
  • Published : 2018.10.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

To solve the problem of unbalanced loads and the short network lifetime of heterogeneous wireless sensor networks, this paper proposes a node-selection algorithm based on energy balance and dynamic adjustment. The spacing and energy of the nodes are calculated according to the proximity to the network nodes and the characteristics of the link structure. The direction factor and the energy-adjustment factor are introduced to optimize the node-selection probability in order to realize the dynamic selection of network nodes. On this basis, the target path is selected by the relevance of the nodes, and nodes with insufficient energy values are excluded in real time by the establishment of the node-selection mechanism, which guarantees the normal operation of the network and a balanced energy consumption. Simulation results show that this algorithm can effectively extend the network lifetime, and it has better stability, higher accuracy, and an enhanced data-receiving rate in sufficient time.

Keywords

References

  1. S. Kosunalp, MAC protocols for energy harvesting wireless sensor networks: Survey, ETRI J. 37 (2015), no. 4, 804-812. https://doi.org/10.4218/etrij.15.0115.0017
  2. H. Sharma, and S. Sharma, A review of sensor networks: technologies and applications, Recent Adv. Eng. Comput. Sci., Chandigarh, India, Mar. 6-8, 2014, pp. 1-4.
  3. E. D. Zubiete et al., Review of wireless sensors networks in health applications, Annu. Int. Conf. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc., Boston, MA, USA, Aug. 30-Sept. 3, 2011, pp. 1789-1793.
  4. W. Wang et al., Unification of theoretical approaches for epidemic spreading on complex networks, Rep. Prog. Phys. 80 (2017), no. 3, 036603:1-036603:16.
  5. R. P. Satorras et al., Epidemic processes in complex networks, Rev. Mod. Phys. 87 (2015), no. 3, 925:1-925:62.
  6. P. Shu et al., Social contagions on interdependent lattice networks, Sci. Rep. 7 (2017), 44669:1-44669:11.
  7. R. Li et al., Deployment-based lifetime optimization model for homogeneous wireless sensor network under retransmission, Sensors 14 (2014), no. 12, 23697-23724. https://doi.org/10.3390/s141223697
  8. S. M. Jameii, K. Faez, and M. Dehghan, Adaptive multi-objective optimization framework for coverage and topology control in heterogeneous wireless sensor networks, Telecommun. Syst. 61 (2016), no. 3, 515-530. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11235-015-0009-6
  9. A. Demertzis, K. Oikonomou, Avoiding energy holes in wireless sensor networks with nonuniform energy distribution, IEEE Int. Conf. Inform., Intell., Syst. Appl., Chania, Greece, July 7-9, 2014, pp. 138-143.
  10. S. Mi et al., A secure scheme for distributed consensus estimation against data falsification in heterogeneous wireless sensor networks, Sensors 16 (2016), no. 2, 51-55.
  11. S. Yasmin, R. N. B. Rais, and A. Qayyum, Resource-aware routing in heterogeneous opportunistic networks, Int. J. Distrib. Sens. Netw. 12 (2016), no. 1, 1-18.
  12. C. Yu et al., Temporal-based ranking in heterogeneous networks, NPC 2014: Network and Parallel Computing, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2014, pp. 23-34.
  13. J. Tian et al., Scheduling survivability-heterogeneous sensor networks for critical location surveillance, ACM Trans. Sens. Netw. 11 (2015), no. 4, 1-23.
  14. A. E. Assaf et al., Low-cost localization for multihop heterogeneous wireless sensor networks, IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. 15 (2016), no. 1, 472-484. https://doi.org/10.1109/TWC.2015.2475255
  15. M. Elhoseny et al., Balancing energy consumption in heterogeneous wireless sensor networks using genetic algorithm, IEEE Commun. Lett. 19 (2015), no. 12, 2194-2197. https://doi.org/10.1109/LCOMM.2014.2381226
  16. J. Yu et al., On connected target k-coverage in heterogeneous wireless sensor networks, Sensors 16 (2016), no. 1, 121-132. https://doi.org/10.3390/s16010121
  17. J. Szurley, A. Bertrand, and M. Moonen, Distributed adaptive node-specific signal estimation in heterogeneous and mixed-topology wireless sensor networks, Signal Proc. 117 (2015), 44-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sigpro.2015.04.023
  18. W. Z. Guo et al., Trust dynamic task allocation algorithm with nash equilibrium for heterogeneous wireless sensor network, Secur. Commun. Netw. 8 (2015), no. 10, 1865-1877. https://doi.org/10.1002/sec.1026
  19. Q. Sun et al., Node importance evaluation method in a wireless sensor network based on energy field model, EURASIP J. Wireless Commun. Netw. 199 (2016), 1-9.
  20. M. Gan, R. Jiang, and R. Rui, Walking on an object-user heterogeneous network for personalized recommendations, Expert Syst. Applicat. 42 (2015), no. 22, 8791-8804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2015.07.032
  21. G. Ye et al., Energy balanced redeployment algorithm for heterogeneous wireless sensor networks, Math. Probl. Eng. 2015 (2015), 1-11.

Cited by

  1. Optimizing Energy Consumption in the Home Energy Management System via a Bio-Inspired Dragonfly Algorithm and the Genetic Algorithm vol.9, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics9030406
  2. An Energy-Efficient Evolutionary Clustering Technique for Disaster Management in IoT Networks vol.20, pp.9, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/s20092647