Journal of The Korean Society of Agricultural Engineers (한국농공학회논문집)

The Korean Society of Agricultural Engineers (한국농공학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of the Difference of Flow Duration Curve according to the Cumulative Variation of the Daily Average Flow in Unit Watershed for TPLCs

총량관리 단위유역 일평균유량의 시계열 누적 변화에 따른 유량지속곡선 차이 분석

  • Hwang, Ha-sun (Water Environmental Research Department, National Institute of Environmental Research) ;
  • Rhee, Han-pil (ETWATERS Inc.) ;
  • Seo, Ji-yeon (Water Environmental Research Department, National Institute of Environmental Research) ;
  • Choi, Yu-jin (Water Environmental Research Department, National Institute of Environmental Research) ;
  • Park, Ji- hyung (Water Environmental Research Department, National Institute of Environmental Research) ;
  • Shin, Dong-seok (Water Environmental Research Department, National Institute of Environmental Research) ;
  • Lee, Sung-jun (Water Environmental Research Department, National Institute of Environmental Research)
  • Received : 2018.09.04
  • Accepted : 2018.10.11
  • Published : 2018.11.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The LDC (Load Duration Curve) method can analyze river water quality changes according to flow rate and seasonal conditions. It is also possible to visually recognize whether the target water quality is exceeded or the size of the reduction load. For this reason, it is used for the optimal reduction of TPLCs and analysis of the cause of water pollution. At this time, the flow duration curve should be representative of the water body hydrologic curve, but if not, the uncertainty of the interpretation becomes big because the damaged flow condition is changed. The purpose of this study is to estimate the daily mean flow of the unit watershed using the HSPF model and to analyze the difference of the flow duration curves according to the cumulative daily mean flow rate using the NSE technique. The results show that it is desirable to construct the flow duration curve by using the daily average flow rate of at least 5 years although there is a difference by unit watershed. However, this is the result of the water bodies at the end of Han River basin watershed, so further study on various water bodies will be necessary in the future.

Keywords

References

  1. Albek, M., U. B. Ogutveren, and E. Albec, 2004. Hydrological modeling of Seydi Suyu watershed (Turkey) with hspf. Journal of Hydrology 285: 260-271. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2003.09.002.
  2. Bicknell, B. R., J. L. Imhoff, J. L. Kittle, A. S. Donigian, and R. C. Johanson, 1996. Hydrologic simulation programfortran user's manual, 12, Athens, GA, US EPA
  3. Brun, S. E., and L. E. Band, 2000. Simulating runoff behavior in an urbanizing watershed. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 24: 5-22. doi:10.1016/s0198-9715(99)00040-X.
  4. Castellarin, A., R. M. Vogel, and A. Brath, 2004, A stochastic index flow model of flow duration curves, Water Resources Research, 40, W03104. doi:10.1029/2003WR002524.
  5. Donigian, A. S., 2000. Hspf training workshop handbook and cd, lecture #19, calibraion and verification issures, Slide #L19-22 EPA Headquarters. Washington Information Center, 10-14 January, 2000. Presented and prepared for US EPA, Office of Science and Technology, Washington, D.C.
  6. Donigian, A. S., J. C. Imhoff,, and B. R. Bicknell, 1983. Predicting water quality resulting from agricultural nonpoint-source pollution via simulation-HSPF. In Agricultural Management and Water Quality, 200-249. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press.
  7. Donigian, A. S., and J. T. Love, 2003. Sediment calibration procedures and guidelines for watershed modeling. WEF Specialty Conference Proceedings on CD-ROM. November 16-19, 2003. Chicago, Illinois, USA.
  8. Fontaine, T. A., and V. M. F. Jacomino, 1997. Sensitivity analysis of simulated contaminated sediment transport. Journal of the American Water Resource Association 33: 313-326. doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.1997.tb03512.X.
  9. Houck, O. A., 2002. The clean water act TMDL program, Environmental Law Institute.
  10. Hwang, H. S., S. J. Lee, J. C. Ryu, J. H. Park, Y. S. Kim, and K. H. Ahn, 2016. A study on selection method of management watershed for total pollution load control at tributary, Journal of Korean Society on Water Environment 32(6): 528-536 (in Korean). https://doi.org/10.15681/KSWE.2016.32.6.528
  11. Hwang, H. S., C. G. Yoon, and J. T. Kim, 2010. Application load duration Ccurve for evaluation of impaired watershed at TMDL Unit watershed in Korea, Journal of Korean Society on Water Environment 26(6): 903-909 (in Korean).
  12. Jeon, J. H., D. H. Choi, K. J. Lim, and T. D. Kim, 2010a. Estimating nutrients delivery ratios at the subwatershed scale; a case study at the Bochung-a watershed. Journal of the Korean Society of Agricultural Engineers 52(5): 27-35 (in Korean). https://doi.org/10.5389/KSAE.2010.52.5.027
  13. Jeon, J. H., D. H. Choi, and T. D. Kim, 2010b. Analysis of characteristics of delivered nonpoint source pollution at forested watershed. Journal of Korean Society of Urban Environment 10(3): 273-280 (in Korean).
  14. Kang, J. H., J. J. Hong, S. G. Kim, M. S. Son, Y. J. Lee, and B. J. Lim, 2010. A study on calculating of delivery ratio daily WinHSPF/BASINS model. Journal of Korean Society of Water Science and Technology 18(5): 19-28 (in Korean).
  15. Kim, T. G., 2014. Assesment of watershed characteristics for apprehensive area of non-point source pollution using load duration curve, Journal of Korean Society of Environmental Technology 15(1): 1-11 (in Korean).
  16. Lee, Y. W., K. D. Song, J. C. Lee, K. S. Yoon, D. H. Rhew, S. W. Lee, and S. H. Lee, 2010. Development of a method for estimating non-point pollutant delivery load of each reference flow with combination of BASINS/HSPF. Korean Society of Environmental Engineers 32(2): 175-184 (in Korean).
  17. Legates, D. R., and G. J. McCabe, 1999, Evaluating the use of "goodness-of-fit" measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model validation, Water Resources Research 35(1): 233-241. doi:10.1029/1998WR900018.
  18. Ministry of Environment (MOE), 2017. Public announcement of implementation standards, Ministry of Environment (in Korean).
  19. Ministry of Environment (MOE), 2012. Water environment information system (WEIS), http://water.nier.go.kr/water Measurement/selectWater.do. Accessed May. 2018.
  20. Ministry of Environment (MOE), 2011. Waterbody and watershed on target water quality in the han river basin, Ministry of Environment (in Korean).
  21. Nash, J. E., and J. V. Sutcliffe, 1970. River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I : a discussion of principles, Journal of Hydrology 10(3): 282-290. doi:10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6.
  22. National Institute Environmental Research(NIER), 2016. A study on the establishment of management standards of total maximum daily loads for the four major river basins (I) (in Korean).
  23. National Institute of Environmental Research(NIER), 2015. Studies on simulation method of pollutant emission characteristics in Korean TMDL (in Korean).
  24. Nebraska, 2004. Total maximum daily loads for the big blue river basin(fecal coliform and e. coli bacteria), Nebraska Department of Environmental Quality Planning Unit, Water Quality Division.
  25. Nebraska, 2002. Nebraska's approach for developing TMDLs for streams using load duration curve.
  26. Nevada, 2003. Load duration curve methodlogy for assessment and TMDL, Development Nevada Division of Environmental Protection.
  27. Oregon, 2004. Bacteria technical appendix, williamette basin TMDL, Oregon Department of Environmental Quality.
  28. Park, J. H., H. S. Hang, D. H. Rhew, and O. S. Kwon, 2012. Estimation of delivery ratio based on BASINS/HSPF model for total maximum daily load. Journal of Korean Society on Water Environment 28(6): 833-842 (in Korean).
  29. Park, J. W ., K. S. Kim , K. S . Hwang, Y. W. Lee, and B. J. Lim, 2013. Application of load duration using discharge-load rating curve at Jiseok stream watershed. Journal of Korean Society on Water Environment 29(4): 523-530 (in Korean).
  30. Park, J. D., and S. Y. Oh, 2012. Methodology for the identification of impaired waters using LDC for the management of total maximum daily loads, Journal of Korean Society on Water Environment 28(5): 693-703 (in Korean).
  31. Shon, T. S., J. B. Park,, H. S. Shin, 2009. A study on estimation of the delivery ratio by flow duration in a small-scale test bed for managing TMDL in Nakdong River. Journal of Korean Society on Water Quality 25(5): 792-802 (in Korean).
  32. Singh, J., H. V. Knapp, and M. Demissie, 2004. Hydrologic modeling of the Iroquois River watershed using HSPF and SWAT. ISWS CR 2004-08. Champaign, Ill.: Illinois State Water Survey. Available at: www.sws.uiuc.edu/pubdoc/CR/ISWSCR2004-08.pdf. Accessed 8 September 2005.
  33. Sloto, R. A., and M. Y. Crouse, 1996. HYSEP : A computer program for stream flow hydrograph separation and analysis. U.S. Geological Survey Water Resources Investigations Report 96-4040. Lemoyne, pA. 46 p.
  34. Song, J. H., and M. S. Kang, 2016. Performance measures and calibration methods for hydrologic and water quality models. Rural Resources 58(2): 2-10 (in Korean).
  35. South California, 2004. Total maximum daily load development for the upper broad river watershed_fecal coliform bacteria, South California Department of Health and Environmental Control.
  36. United States Environmental Protection Agency (U. S. EPA), 2011. Lecture #15, watershed model calibration and validation: Issues and Procedures, https://www3.epa.gov/ceampubl/basins/training/b4lec15.pdf, pp. 11.
  37. United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Wetlands, Oceans, & Watersheds (U. S. EPA.), 2007. An approach for using load duration curves in the development of TMDLs, U. S. EPA Office of Wetlands, Oceans, & Watersheds.
  38. Vogel, R. M., and N. M. Fennessey, 1995. Flow duration curves II. A review of applications in water resource planning. Water Resour. Bull. 31 (6), 1029-1039 doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.1995.tb03419.x.