Journal of the Korean Chemical Society (대한화학회지)

Korean Chemical Society (대한화학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of Mentor Teachers' Mentoring Type and Type Changes in Collaborative Mentoring Programs for Professional Development of Beginning Science Teachers' Teaching Practice

초임과학교사 수업 전문성 신장을 위한 협력적 멘토링 과정에서 나타나는 멘토교사의 멘토링 유형 및 유형 변화 분석

  • Jung, Dojun (Department of Chemistry Education, Pusan National University) ;
  • Nam, Jeonghee (Department of Chemistry Education, Pusan National University)
  • 정도준 (부산대학교 화학교육과) ;
  • 남정희 (부산대학교 화학교육과)
  • Received : 2018.06.11
  • Accepted : 2018.10.18
  • Published : 2018.12.20
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study investigated mentor teachers' mentoring types and how the types of mentoring changed throughout the collaborative mentoring program for beginning science teachers who had difficulties in teaching practice. One-on-one mentoring meetings were audio-taped and transcribed for analysis. The result of the study showed that mentors took various roles such as Observer, Critical friend, Provider of feedback, Instructor, Role model, Evaluator, Counselor, and Equal partner. However, if mentoring did not bring about a change in the perception of a science instruction of a mentee teacher, there was no positive change in the teaching of the mentee teacher. Therefore, mentor teacher must have enough time to concretely discuss about mentee teachers' perception of a science instruction, mentoring method, etc. with mentee teacher before mentoring.

이 연구는 교수 활동에 어려움을 겪는 초임 중등과학교사를 대상으로 실시한 협력적 멘토링 과정에서 멘토교사의 멘토링 유형이 어떻게 나타나는지 살펴보고, 멘토링이 진행됨에 따라 멘토교사의 멘토링 유형이 어떻게 변화하는지 알아보고자 하였다. 이를 위하여 멘토링에서 수집된 멘토교사와 멘티교사의 일대일 멘토링 대화를 질적으로 분석하였다. 연구 결과, 협력적 멘토링 과정에서 멘토교사는 관찰자, 비판적 동료, 지원자, 지시자, 역할 모델, 평가자, 상담자, 동반자 등 다양한 역할을 수행하였다. 그러나 멘토교사의 멘토링이 멘티교사의 과학교수에 대한 인식 변화를 가져오지 못하는 경우에는 멘티교사의 수업에서 긍정적인 변화가 나타나지 않았다. 따라서 멘토교사는 멘토링을 실시하기 전 멘티교사와 함께 과학교수에 대한 신념, 멘토링 방법 등에 관해 구체적으로 논의하는 시간을 충분히 가져야 할 것이다. 또한 멘토교사는 멘티교사의 수업 전문성 향상을 유도하기 위해 다양한 역할이 존재하고 있음을 인식하고, 자신의 멘토링 과정을 평가하는 데에도 이를 활용할 수 있어야 할 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Kwak, Y. S. Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society 2009, 30, 354. https://doi.org/10.5467/JKESS.2009.30.3.354
  2. Lederman, N. D.; Gess-Newsome, J. In Examining Pedagogical Content Knowledge, Gess-Newsome, J., Lederman, N. G., Eds.; Kluwer Academic Publishers: U.S.A., 1999; pp.199-213.
  3. Go, M. S. The Effect of Cooperative Mentoring for Beginning Science Teachers' Reflective Practice in their Teaching Performance. Ph. D. Thesis, Pusan National University of Education, Busan, Korea, 2010.
  4. Shin, B. S. The Journal of Korean Teacher Education 2010, 27, 277. https://doi.org/10.24211/tjkte.2010.27.1.277
  5. Go, M. S.,; Lee, S. D.,; Choi, J. H.; Nam, J. H. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education 2009, 29, 564.
  6. Kwak, Y. S. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education 2011, 31, 1.
  7. Nam, J. H.; Lee, S, D.; Lim, J, H.; Moon, S. B. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education 2010, 30, 953.
  8. Ingersoll, R. M.; Strong, M. Review of Education Research 2011, 81, 201. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311403323
  9. Achinstein, B.; Fogo, B. Teaching and Teacher Education 2015, 45, 45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.09.002
  10. Caena, F. European Journal of Education 2014, 49, 311. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12088
  11. Livingston, K. European Journal of Teacher Education 2016, 39, 1. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2016.1135531
  12. Nam, J. H.; Go, M. R.; Lee, S. D.; Go, M. S.; Sung, H. M. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education 2012, 32, 1613.
  13. Britzman, D. P. Practice makes practice: A critical study of learning to teach; SUNY Press: U.S.A., 1991.
  14. Loughran, J. J. Developing Reflective Practice: Learning about Teaching and Learning through Modelling; Falmer Press: U.S.A., 2002.
  15. Franke, A.; Dahlgren, L. O. Teaching and Teacher Education 1996, 12, 627. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(96)00004-2
  16. Koballa, T. R.; Bradbury, L. U.; Glynn, S.; Deaton, C. M. Journal of Science Teacher Education 2008, 19, 391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-008-9101-z
  17. Chan, C. K. K.; Pang, M. F. Teaching Education 2006, 17, 1. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210500527899
  18. Russell, T.; McPherson, S.; Martin, A. K. Canadian Journal of Education 2001, 26, 37. https://doi.org/10.2307/1602144
  19. Hobson, A. J.; Ashby, P.; Malderez, A.; Tomlinson, P. D. Teaching and Teacher Education 2009, 25, 207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2008.09.001
  20. Kram, K. E. Academy of Management Journal 1983, 26, 608.
  21. Ambrosetti, A. Australian Journal of Teacher Education 2014, 39, 30.
  22. Rajuan, M.; Beijaard, D.; Verloop, N. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning 2007, 15, 223. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611260701201703
  23. Kwan, T.; Lopez-Real, F. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education 2005, 33, 275. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598660500286267
  24. Park, J. H.; Nam, J. H.; Kwon, J. I. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education 2015, 35, 557. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2015.35.4.0557
  25. Shulman, L. S. Harvard Educational Review 1987, 57, 1. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
  26. Lee, S. D. Analysis of the effect on collaborative mentoring program for development of mentor standards in secondary science teaching. Ph. D. Thesis, Pusan National University of Education, Busan, Korea, 2015.
  27. Go, M. R.; Nam, J. H.; Lim, J, H. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education 2009, 29, 54.
  28. Koerner, M. E. Journal of Teacher Education, 1992, 43, 46. https://doi.org/10.1177/002248719204300107
  29. Feiman-Nemser, S. Journal of Teacher Education, 2001, 52, 17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487101052001003