Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases

The Korean Academy of Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases (대한결핵및호흡기학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effectiveness and Safety of High-Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen Delivery during Bronchoalveolar Lavage in Acute Respiratory Failure Patients

  • Kim, Eun Jin (Department of Internal Medicine, Daegu Catholic University Medical Center, Daegu Catholic University School of Medicine) ;
  • Jung, Chi Young (Department of Internal Medicine, Daegu Catholic University Medical Center, Daegu Catholic University School of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Kyung Chan (Department of Internal Medicine, Daegu Catholic University Medical Center, Daegu Catholic University School of Medicine)
  • Received : 2017.11.17
  • Accepted : 2018.04.22
  • Published : 2018.10.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Background: Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) is a necessary procedure for diagnosis of various lung diseases. High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen delivery was recently introduced. This study aimed to investigate the safety and effectiveness of HFNC oxygen supply during BAL procedure in patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF). Methods: Patients who underwent BAL while using HFNC at a partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood/fraction of inspired oxygen ($PaO_2/FiO_2$; PF) ratio of 300 or below among patients who had been admitted from March 2013 to May 2017 were retrospectively investigated. Results: Thirty-three BAL procedures were confirmed. Their baseline PF ratio was $166.1{\pm}46.7$. $FiO_2$ values before, during, and after BAL were $0.45{\pm}0.12$, $0.74{\pm}0.19$, and $0.57{\pm}0.14$, respectively. Flow (L/min) values before, during, and after BAL were $26.5{\pm}20.3$, $49.0{\pm}7.2$, and $40.8{\pm}14.2$, respectively. Both $FiO_2$ and flow during and after the procedure were significantly different from those before the procedure (both p<0.001). Oxygen saturation levels before, during, and after BAL measured by pulse oximeter were $94.8{\pm}2.9$, $94.6{\pm}3.5$, and $95.2{\pm}2.8%$, respectively. There were no significant differences in oxygen saturation among the three groups. Complications of BAL procedure included transient hypoxemia, hypotension, and fever. However, there was no endotracheal intubation within 24 hours. Baseline PF ratio in "without HFNC" group was significantly higher than that in "with HFNC" group. There were no differences in complications between the two groups. Conclusion: The use of HFNC during BAL procedure in ARF patients was effective and safe. However, there were no significant differences in oxygen saturation level and complications comparing "without HFNC" group in mild ARF. More studies are needed for moderate to severe ARF patients.

Keywords

References

  1. Artigas A, Castella X. Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) in adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). In: Vincent JL, editor. Update in intensive care and emergency medicine. Vol. 14, update 1991. Berline: Springer; 1991. p. 192-7.
  2. Crystal RG, Reynolds HY, Kalica AR. Bronchoalveolar lavage: the report of an international conference. Chest 1986;90:122-31. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.90.1.122
  3. Reynolds HY. Bronchoalveolar lavage. Am Rev Respir Dis 1987;135:250-63.
  4. Bronchoalveolar lavage constituents in healthy individuals, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, and selected comparison groups. The BAL Cooperative Group Steering Committee. Am Rev Respir Dis 1990;141(5 Pt 2):S169-202. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm/141.5_Pt_2.S169
  5. Albertini RE, Harrell JH 2nd, Kurihara N, Moser KM. Arterial hypoxemia induced by fiberoptic bronchoscopy. JAMA 1974;230:1666-7. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1974.03240120034016
  6. Antonelli M, Conti G, Riccioni L, Meduri GU. Noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation via face mask during bronchoscopy with BAL in high-risk hypoxemic patients. Chest 1996;110:724-8. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.110.3.724
  7. Song JU, Kim SA, Choi ER, SM Kim, Choi HJ, Lim SY, et al. Prediction of intubation after bronchoscopy with non-invasive positive pressure ventilation support in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. Tuberc Respir Dis 2009;67:21-6. https://doi.org/10.4046/trd.2009.67.1.21
  8. Ricard JD. High flow nasal oxygen in acute respiratory failure. Minerva Anestesiol 2012;78:836-41.
  9. Sztrymf B, Messika J, Mayot T, Lenglet H, Dreyfuss D, Ricard JD. Impact of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy on intensive care unit patients with acute respiratory failure: a prospective observational study. J Crit Care 2012;27:324.e9-13.
  10. Frat JP, Thille AW, Mercat A, Girault C, Ragot S, Perbet S, et al. High-flow oxygen through nasal cannula in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. N Engl J Med 2015;372:2185-96. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1503326
  11. Lucangelo U, Vassallo FG, Marras E, Ferluga M, Beziza E, Comuzzi L, et al. High-flow nasal interface improves oxygenation in patients undergoing bronchoscopy. Crit Care Res Pract 2012;2012:506382.
  12. Simon M, Braune S, Frings D, Wiontzek AK, Klose H, Kluge S. High-flow nasal cannula oxygen versus non-invasive ventilation in patients with acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure undergoing flexible bronchoscopy: a prospective randomised trial. Crit Care 2014;18:712. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-014-0712-9
  13. La Combe B, Messika J, Labbe V, Razazi K, Maitre B, Sztrymf B, et al. High-flow nasal oxygen for bronchoalveolar lavage in acute respiratory failure patients. Eur Respir J 2016;47:1283-6. https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.01883-2015
  14. Ferguson ND, Fan E, Camporota L, Antonelli M, Anzueto A, Beale R, et al. The Berlin definition of ARDS: an expanded rationale, justification, and supplementary material. Intensive Care Med 2012;38:1573-82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-012-2682-1
  15. Cairo JM. Administering medical gases: regulators, flowmeters, and controlling device. In: Cairo JM, Pilbeam SP, editors. Mosby's respiratory care equipment. 8th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 2010. p. 59-87.
  16. Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, Cushman WC, Green LA, Izzo JL Jr, et al. Seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Hypertension 2003;42:1206-52. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.HYP.0000107251.49515.c2
  17. Sund-Levander M, Forsberg C, Wahren LK. Normal oral, rectal, tympanic and axillary body temperature in adult men and women: a systematic literature review. Scand J Caring Sci 2002;16:122-8. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1471-6712.2002.00069.x
  18. Maitre B, Jaber S, Maggiore SM, Bergot E, Richard JC, Bakthiari H, et al. Continuous positive airway pressure during fiberoptic bronchoscopy in hypoxemic patients: a randomized double-blind study using a new device. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000;162(3 Pt 1):1063-7. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.162.3.9910117
  19. Hilbert G, Gruson D, Vargas F, Valentino R, Favier JC, Portel L, et al. Bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage via the laryngeal mask airway in high-risk hypoxemic immunosuppressed patients. Crit Care Med 2001;29:249-55. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003246-200102000-00004
  20. Baumann HJ, Klose H, Simon M, Ghadban T, Braune SA, Hennigs JK, et al. Fiber optic bronchoscopy in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure requiring noninvasive ventilation: a feasibility study. Crit Care 2011;15:R179. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc10328
  21. Fishman JA. Approach to the patient with pulmonary infection. In: Grippi MA, Elias JA, Fishman JA, Kotloff RM, Pack AI, Senior RM, et al., editors. Fishman's pulmonary diseases and disorders. 5th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Co, Inc.; 2015. p. 1853-79.
  22. Cordier JF. Cryptogenic organising pneumonia. Eur Respir J 2006;28:422-46. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.06.00013505
  23. Payne CB Jr, Goyal PC, Gupta SC. Effects of transoral and transnasal fiberoptic bronchoscopy on oxygenation and cardiac rhythm. Endoscopy 1986;18:1-3.
  24. Katz AS, Michelson EL, Stawicki J, Holford FD. Cardiac arrhythmias: frequency during fiberoptic bronchoscopy and correlation with hypoxemia. Arch Intern Med 1981;141:603-6. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.1981.00340050055014
  25. Goldstein RA, Rohatgi PK, Bergofsky EH, Block ER, Daniele RP, Dantzker DR, et al. Clinical role of bronchoalveolar lavage in adults with pulmonary disease. Am Rev Respir Dis 1990;142:481-6. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm/142.2.481
  26. Matsumoto T, Sato Y, Fukuda S, Katayama S, Miyazaki Y, Ozaki M, et al. Safety and efficacy of bronchoalveolar lavage using a laryngeal mask airway in cases of acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure with diffuse lung infiltrates. Intern Med 2015;54:731-5. https://doi.org/10.2169/internalmedicine.54.2686
  27. Lee JH, Rehder KJ, Williford L, Cheifetz IM, Turner DA. Use of high flow nasal cannula in critically ill infants, children, and adults: a critical review of the literature. Intensive Care Med 2013;39:247-57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-012-2743-5
  28. Parke R, McGuinness S, Eccleston M. Nasal high-flow therapy delivers low level positive airway pressure. Br J Anaesth 2009;103:886-90. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aep280
  29. Gotera C, Diaz Lobato S, Pinto T, Winck JC. Clinical evidence on high flow oxygen therapy and active humidification in adults. Rev Port Pneumol 2013;19:217-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rppneu.2013.03.005
  30. Miyagi K, Haranaga S, Higa F, Tateyama M, Fujita J. Implementation of bronchoalveolar lavage using a high-flow nasal cannula in five cases of acute respiratory failure. Respir Investig 2014;52:310-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resinv.2014.06.006
  31. Delclaux C, L'Her E, Alberti C, Mancebo J, Abroug F, Conti G, et al. Treatment of acute hypoxemic nonhypercapnic respiratory insufficiency with continuous positive airway pressure delivered by a face mask: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2000;284:2352-60. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.284.18.2352
  32. Demoule A, Girou E, Richard JC, Taille S, Brochard L. Increased use of noninvasive ventilation in French intensive care units. Intensive Care Med 2006;32:1747-55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-006-0229-z

Cited by

  1. High-Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen Delivery during Bronchoalveolar Lavage: A Question of Methodology Influence? vol.82, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4046/trd.2018.0058
  2. 일산화탄소 중독 환자에서 고유속 비강 캐뉼라 산소치료 효과에 대한 예비 연구 vol.17, pp.2, 2019, https://doi.org/10.22537/jksct.17.2.102
  3. Benefit-to-risk balance of bronchoalveolar lavage in the critically ill. A prospective, multicenter cohort study vol.46, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-019-05896-4
  4. Lung Ultrasound as a Monitoring Tool vol.83, pp.suppl1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.4046/trd.2020.0149
  5. Risk factors of complications during noninvasive mechanical ventilation -assisted flexible bronchoscopy vol.66, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advms.2021.04.001
  6. High flow nasal cannula versus standard low flow nasal oxygen during flexible bronchoscopy in children: A randomized controlled trial vol.56, pp.12, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1002/ppul.25655
  7. Oxygenation strategies during flexible bronchoscopy: a review of the literature vol.22, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-021-01846-1
  8. High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy for outpatients undergoing flexible bronchoscopy: a randomised controlled trial vol.77, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2021-217116