DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Computational and experimental forensics characterization of weapons-grade plutonium produced in a thermal neutron environment

  • Osborn, Jeremy M. (Department of Nuclear Engineering, Texas A&M University) ;
  • Glennon, Kevin J. (Cyclotron Institute, Texas A&M University) ;
  • Kitcher, Evans D. (Center for Nuclear Security Science & Policy Initiatives, Texas A&M University) ;
  • Burns, Jonathan D. (Center for Nuclear Security Science & Policy Initiatives, Texas A&M University) ;
  • Folden, Charles M.III (Cyclotron Institute, Texas A&M University) ;
  • Chirayath, Sunil S. (Department of Nuclear Engineering, Texas A&M University)
  • Received : 2018.03.07
  • Accepted : 2018.04.30
  • Published : 2018.08.25

Abstract

The growing nuclear threat has amplified the need for developing diverse and accurate nuclear forensics analysis techniques to strengthen nuclear security measures. The work presented here is part of a research effort focused on developing a methodology for reactor-type discrimination of weapons-grade plutonium. To verify the developed methodology, natural $UO_2$ fuel samples were irradiated in a thermal neutron spectrum at the University of Missouri Research Reactor (MURR) and produced approximately $20{\mu}g$ of weapons-grade plutonium test material. Radiation transport simulations of common thermal reactor types that can produce weapons-grade plutonium were performed, and the results are presented here. These simulations were needed to verify whether the plutonium produced in the natural $UO_2$ fuel samples during the experimental irradiation at MURR was a suitable representative to plutonium produced in common thermal reactor types. Also presented are comparisons of fission product and plutonium concentrations obtained from computational simulations of the experimental irradiation at MURR to the nondestructive and destructive measurements of the irradiated natural $UO_2$ fuel samples. Gamma spectroscopy measurements of radioactive fission products were mostly within 10%, mass spectroscopy measurements of the total plutonium mass were within 4%, and mass spectroscopy measurements of stable fission products were mostly within 5%.

Keywords

References

  1. S.S. Chirayath, J.M. Osborn, T.M. Coles, Trace fission product ratios for nuclear forensics attribution of weapons-grade plutonium from fast and thermal reactors, Sci. Glob. Secur. 23 (2015) 48-67, https://doi.org/10.1080/ 08929882.2015.996079.
  2. J.C. Mark, Explosive properties of reactor-grade plutonium, Sci. Global Secur 4 (1993) 111, https://doi.org/10.1080/08929889308426394.
  3. First Atomic Energy of Canada Limited, Canada Enters the Nuclear Age: A Technical History of Atomic Energy of Canada Limited as Seen from Its Research Laboratories, McGill-Queen's Press, Montreal, 1997.
  4. S.E. Jensen, E. Nonbol, Description of the Magnox Type of Gas Cooled Reactor (MAGNOX), NKS/RAK-2(97)TR-C5, Riso National Laboratory, 1998.
  5. A. Ahmad, A. Glaser, A conversion proposal for Iran's IR-40 reactor with reduced plutonium production, Sci. Global Secur. 23 (2015) 3-19, https:// doi.org/10.1080/08929882.2015.996074.
  6. D. Albright, Israel's Military Plutonium Inventory, Institute for Science and International Security, 2015.
  7. Central Intelligence Agency, Pakistan: A New Reactor Under Construction, Released September, 1999.
  8. T. Patton, Combining satellite imagery and 3D drawing tools for nonproliferation analysis: a case study of pakistan's khushab plutonium production reactors, Sci. Global Secur 20 (2012) 117-140, https://doi.org/10.1080/08929882.2012.719383.
  9. D. Albright, S. Kelleher-Vergantini, India's Stocks of Civil and Military Plutonium and Highly Enriched Uranium, End 2014, Institute for Science and International Security, 2015.
  10. N. Veeraraghavan, Research Reactor Dhruva, IAEA-SM-310/114, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre.
  11. D. Albright, C. Walrond, Update on the Arak Reactor, Institute for Science and International Security, 2013.
  12. C. Braun, S. Hecker, C. Lawrence, P. Papadiamantis, North Korean Nuclear Facilities After the Agreed Framework, Center for International Security and Cooperation, Stanford University, 2016.
  13. J.M. Osborn, E.D.Kitcher, J.D.Burns, C.M. FoldenIII, S.S.Chirayath, Nuclear forensics methodology for reactor-type attribution of chemically separated plutonium, Nucl. Tech 201 (2018) 1-10, https://doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2017.1401442.
  14. M.W. Swinney, C.M. Folden III, R. Ellis, S.S. Chirayath, Experimental and computational forensics characterization of weapons-grade plutonium produced in a fast reactor neutron environment, Nucl. Technol 197 (2017) 1-11, https://doi.org/10.13182/NT16-76.
  15. Missouri University Research Reactor (MURR), Safety Analysis Report, MU Project # 000763, 2006. https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0921/ML092110573.pdf.
  16. D.B. Pelowitz, MCNP6 User's Manual, Version 1.0, LA-CP-13e00634, Los Alamos National Laboratory, 2013.
  17. J. Hendricks, et al., MCNPX 2.6.0 Extensions, LA-UR-08-2216, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, 2008.
  18. R.S. Kemp, Two methods for converting a heavy-water research reactor to use low-enriched-uranium fuel to improve proliferation resistance after startup, Energy Technology & Policy 2 (2015) 39-46, https://doi.org/10.1080/ 23317000.2015.1012687.
  19. EEAS Press Team, Statement of the High Representative/Vice President Federica Mogherini on the conclusion of an Official Document regarding the modernisation of the Arak reactor in Iran, 2016. http://eeas.europa.eu/archives/docs/statements-eeas/docs/151122_arak_official_document_en.pdf.
  20. S.S. Bajaj, A.R. Gore, The Indian PHWR, Nucl. Eng. Des 236 (2006) 701-722, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2005.09.028.
  21. E. Rauch, Development of a Safeguards Approach for a Small Graphite Moderated Reactor and Associated Fuel Cycle Facilities, M.S. Thesis, Texas A&M University, 2009.
  22. Neutron Fluence Measurements, STI/DOC/10/107, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, 1970.
  23. A.C. Hayes, G. Jungman, Determining reactor flux from xenon-136 and cesium-135 in spent fuel, Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 690 (2012) 68-74, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2012.06.031.
  24. DOE Fundamentals Handbook: Nuclear Physics and Reactor Theory: Volume 2 of 2, DOE-HDBK-1019/2-93, U.S. Department of Energy, 1993.

Cited by

  1. Experimental validation of a nuclear forensics methodology for source reactor-type discrimination of chemically separated plutonium vol.51, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2018.11.003
  2. Measuring key Sm isotope ratios in irradiated UO2 for use in plutonium discrimination nuclear forensics vol.320, pp.2, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-019-06486-w
  3. Discrimination of weapons-grade plutonium from thermal reactors in nuclear forensics vol.322, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-019-06810-4
  4. Monte Carlo neutronics benchmarks on nuclear fuel depletion: A review vol.161, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2021.108441