DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Accessory auricle: Classification according to location, protrusion pattern and body shape

  • Hwang, Jungil (Department of Plastic Surgery, Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine) ;
  • Cho, Jaeyoung (Department of Plastic Surgery, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine) ;
  • Burm, Jin Sik (Department of Plastic Surgery, Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine)
  • Received : 2018.05.03
  • Accepted : 2018.08.29
  • Published : 2018.09.15

Abstract

Background Accessory auricles (AAs) are common congenital anomalies. We present a new classification according to location and shape, and propose a system for coding the classifications. Methods This study was conducted by reviewing the records of 502 patients who underwent surgery for AA. AAs were classified into three anatomical types: intraauricular, preauricular, and buccal. Intraauricular AAs were divided into three subtypes: intracrural, intratragal, and intralobal. Preauricular AAs were divided into five subtypes: precrural, superior pretragal, middle pretragal, inferior pretragal, and prelobal. Buccal AAs were divided into two subtypes: anterior buccal and posterior buccal. AAs were also classified according to their protrusion pattern above the surrounding surface: pedunculated, sessile, areolar, remnant, and depressed. Pedunculated and sessile AAs were subclassified as spherical, ovoid, lobed, and nodular, according to their body shape. Cartilage root presence and family history of AA were reviewed. A coding system for these classifications was also proposed. Results The total number of AAs in the 502 patients was 1,003. Among the locations, the superior pretragal subtype (27.6%) was the most common. Among the protrusion patterns and shapes, pedunculated ovoid AAs were the most common in the preauricular (27.8%) and buccal areas (28.0%), and sessile lobed AAs were the most common in the intraauricular area (48.7%). The proportion of AAs with a cartilage root was 78.4%, and 11% of patients had a family history. The most common type of preauricular AA was the superior pretragal pedunculated ovoid AA (13.2%) with a cartilage root. Conclusions This new system will serve as a guideline for classifying and coding AAs.

Keywords

References

  1. Kagurasho M, Yamada S, Uwabe C, et al. Movement of the external ear in human embryo. Head Face Med 2012;8:2. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-160X-8-2
  2. Porter CJ, Tan ST. Congenital auricular anomalies: topographic anatomy, embryology, classification, and treatment strategies. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005;115:1701-12. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PRS.0000161454.08384.0A
  3. Brownstein MH, Wanger N, Helwig EB. Accessory tragi. Arch Dermatol 1971;104:625-31. https://doi.org/10.1001/archderm.1971.04000240049006
  4. Bahrani B, Khachemoune A. Review of accessory tragus with highlights of its associated syndromes. Int J Dermatol 2014;53:1442-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijd.12369
  5. Kugelman A, Hadad B, Ben-David J, et al. Preauricular tags and pits in the newborn: the role of hearing tests. Acta Paediatr 1997;86:170-2.
  6. Dancel R, Price D, Kaufmann L. Evaluation of newborns with preauricular skin lesions. Am Fam Physician 2012;85: 993-8.
  7. Beder LB, Kemaloglu YK, Maral I, et al. A study on the prevalence of accessory auricle anomaly in Turkey. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2002;63:25-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-5876(01)00639-5
  8. Moon IY, Oh KS. Surgical correction of an accessory auricle, polyotia. Arch Plast Surg 2014;41:427-9. https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2014.41.4.427
  9. Park C. Lower auricular malformations: their representation, correction, and embryologic correlation. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999;104:29-40. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199907000-00005

Cited by

  1. Accessory tragus: Report of a case in a rare location on the nasal vestibule vol.37, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1111/pde.14090