Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design (대한건축학회논문집:계획계)

Architectural Institute of Korea (대한건축학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Positive and Negative Factors on the Homeshare Life - Focused on the Case of Seoul City -

홈셰어 주거생활에서의 긍정 및 부정요인에 대한 조사 분석 - 서울시 실사례를 중심으로 -

  • 이미숙 (숭실대 일반대학원 실내디자인학과) ;
  • 서귀숙 (숭실대 건축학부 실내건축전공) ;
  • 김주연 (숭실대 건축학부 실내건축전공) ;
  • 조재순 (한국교원대 가정교육과)
  • Received : 2018.06.04
  • Accepted : 2018.09.13
  • Published : 2018.10.30
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to identify the characteristics of the positive and negative expressions about residential common life between the elderly and the young and present the direction on Homeshare. In-depth interviews were conducted from Feb. to May 2016 to identify the experiences of residential common life with 10 elderly and 11 young. The result is as follows. First, Homeshare dwelling was classified into five themes of human being, residential environment, life, management and emotion. Homeshare unlike ordinary dwelling centered on blood relatives, is characteristic to involve the management that connects between the elderly and young. Second, both the elderly and young were analyzed to be positive about the residential common life. It was shown that the elderly are most positive about human being, whereas young are positive about management and residential environment. The elderly is positive to mutual exchange with the young and young's independent life but the young is positive to factors that support comfortable personal life. Third, negative expression was shown a generation gap between the elderly and the young. The elderly recognized to be negative that young people has lived freely without consideration for the elderly. In order to solve these factors, it is necessary to make improvements through arranging rules for living. Fourth, three themes, human being, residential environment and life, analyzed to be the most important factors to sustain residential common life of Homeshare. The link between management and 3 themes leads to an expansion of positive emotion, which is structurally stable and is expected to increase the sustainability of the residential common life on Homeshare.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 한국연구재단

References

  1. Architectural Institute of Korea. (2010). Introduction to Housing. Seoul: Kimoondang.
  2. Danigelis, N. and Fengler, A. (1991). No Place Like Home: Intergenerational Home Sharing Through Social Exchange. New York: Columbia University Press.
  3. Homeshare International. (2017). Programmes worldwide. Retrieved from http://homeshare.org/programmes-worldwide/. accessed 20th May 2018.
  4. Hong, S., & Kim, H. (2015). Children's support and quality of life according to the sex and spouse of the elderly. Proceeding of Conference in Korean Home Management Association, 2015(5), 283.
  5. Jaffe, D. (1989). Caring Strangers: The Sociology of Intergenerational Homesharing. London: JAI PRESS LTD.
  6. Jee, E. (2016). A Study on Shared House Living Conditions and Needs for Young Single-Person Household’s Housing Welfare: Focus on the Resident and Potential Consumer for College Student of a Shared House. Family and Environment Research, 54(6), 589-598. https://doi.org/10.6115/fer.2016.046
  7. Jeong, D., Hong, H., & Jee, E. (2015). A Study on Recognition and Demands about Mixed-Generation House-Sharing. Journal of Korean Home Management Association, 33(6), 65-75. https://doi.org/10.7466/JKHMA.2015.33.6.65
  8. Ju, H. (2017). A Series of Invisible Conflicts in the 'Intergenerational Empathy under one roof'...What is the solution?. Daily UNN, 28th September 2017. Retrieved from http://news.unn.net/news/articleView.html?idxno=179107, accessed 20th April 2018.
  9. Ju, H., & Moon, J. (2015). A study on the Spatial Arrangement and Area of Senior Sharehouses in Japan. Journal of the Korean Housing Association, 26(2), 13-20. https://doi.org/10.6107/JKHA.2015.26.2.013
  10. Kang, A. (1999). A study on lodging location analysis at Shinchon area in Seoul. Thesis, Ehwa University.
  11. Kim, I. (2016). Qualitative method and analysis in social welfare research. Seoul: Jipmoondang.
  12. Korean Statistical Information Service (2016). Population and Housing Census for Korea. Statistics Korea. Retrieved from http://kosis.kr/statHtml/statHtml.do?orgId=101&tblId=DT_1IN1509&conn_path=I3, accessed 6th April 2018.
  13. Korean Statistical Information Service (2010). Population and Housing Census for Korea. Statistics Korea. Retrieved from http://kosis.kr/statHtml/statHtml.do?orgId=101&tblId= DT_1JC1017&conn_path=I3, accessed 6th April 2018.
  14. Lee, H. (2018. 2. 21), Finally, 'Homesharing' interrupted by generational gap. Munwha Daily News, 21th February 2018 Retrieved from http://www.munhwa.com/news/view.html?no=2018022101071327330001, accessed 20th April 2018.
  15. Lee, J., & Kim, T. (2014). Policy Strategies for Reducing Income and Asset Poverty Among Korean Old-Age Households. Health and Welfare Policy Forum, 212(-), 64-73.
  16. Lee, J. (2017). A Study on the Space Composition and the Characteristics of Public Space Planning in Domestic and Japanese Share Houses. Master's thesis, Daejin University, Pocheon.
  17. Lee, M., & Suh, K. (2016). Analysis on management about the intergenerational homeshare by senior-young student: Focusing on 4 districts in Seoul, Korea. Korean Institute of Interior Design Journal, 25(3), 90-101. https://doi.org/10.14774/JKIID.2016.25.3.090
  18. Lee, M., & Suh, K. (2016). Performance of the Family Role in Daily Life using Home Share. Proceeding of Conference in Architectural institute of Korea, 36(2), 151-152.
  19. Lee, M., & Suh, K. (2017). Relation of Common Life of Housing of the Homeshare by the Unrelated Elderly and Young. Journal of the Korean Housing .Association, 28(5), 61-71. https://doi.org/10.6107/JKHA.2017.28.5.061
  20. Ministry of Heath and Welfare & Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs. (2015). 2014 National Survey of Elderly. Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs.
  21. Ministry of Heath and Welfare & Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs. (2017). 2017 National Survey of Elderly. Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs.
  22. Miyahara, M., & Nishide, K. (2011). Possibilities of the Inter-Generational and Unrelated Home Sharing. Journal of Architecture and Planning, AIJ, 81(730), 513-520.
  23. National Institute of Korean Language (2018). Pyojungukeodaesajeon[ Standard Korean Language Dictonary]. Retrieved from http://stdweb2.korean.go.kr/main.jsp, 12th May 2018.
  24. Oh, J. & Choi, J. (2014). A Study on the Demand Characteristics and Influence Factors Affecting Shared House in Korea. Journal of the Korean Housing Association, 25(3), 63-72. https://doi.org/10.6107/JKHA.2014.25.3.063
  25. Oh, L., & Yoo, J. (2016). A Study on the Share-house Case Analysis of Internal Shared and Private Space. Proceeding of Conference in Architectural institute of Korea, 36(2), 165-174.
  26. Park, J. (2005). The problem of generations in Korea: beyond differences and conflicts. Paju: Naman.
  27. Park, Y., Suh, K., & Park, S. (2017). A Survey of Share Life and Use of Shared Space based on Case Studies of Homeshare. Proceeding of Conference in Architectural institute of Korea, 37(1), 935-936.
  28. Social Innovation Division. (2012). Plan to promote sharing city in Seoul. Seoul Metropolitan City Government. Retrieved from http://opengov.seoul.go.kr/public /64161, 12th May 2018.