DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

De-Escalation of P2Y12 Receptor Inhibitor Therapy after Acute Coronary Syndromes in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

  • Received : 2018.07.31
  • Accepted : 2018.08.12
  • Published : 2018.10.31

Abstract

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) - a combination of a $P2Y_{12}$ receptor inhibitor and aspirin - has revolutionized antithrombotic treatment. Potent $P2Y_{12}$ inhibitors such as prasugrel and ticagrelor exhibit a strong and more consistent platelet inhibition when compared to clopidogrel. Therefore, ticagrelor and prasugrel significantly reduce ischemic events, but at an expense of an increased bleeding risk in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). These observations have engaged intensive clinical research in alternative DAPT regimens to achieve sufficient platelet inhibition with an acceptable bleeding risk. Our review focusses on $P2Y_{12}$ receptor therapy de-escalation defined as a switch from a potent antiplatelet agent (ticagrelor or prasugrel) to clopidogrel. Recently, both unguided (platelet function testing independent) and guided (platelet function testing dependent) DAPT de-escalation strategies have been investigated in different clinical studies and both switching strategies could be possible options to prevent bleeding complications without increasing ischemic risk. In light of the still limited data currently available, future large-scale trials should accumulate more data on various DAPT de-escalation regimens with both ticagrelor and prasugrel in unguided and guided de-escalation approaches. In the current review we aim at summarizing and discussing the current evidence on this still emerging topic in the field of antiplatelet treatment.

Keywords

References

  1. Schomig A, Neumann FJ, Kastrati A, et al. A randomized comparison of antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy after the placement of coronary-artery stents. N Engl J Med 1996;334:1084-9. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199604253341702
  2. Franchi F, Angiolillo DJ. Novel antiplatelet agents in acute coronary syndrome. Nat Rev Cardiol 2015;12:30-47. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrcardio.2014.156
  3. Wallentin L, Becker RC, Budaj A, et al. Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 2009;361:1045-57. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0904327
  4. Wiviott SD, Braunwald E, McCabe CH, et al. Prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 2007;357:2001-15. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0706482
  5. Sibbing D, Angiolillo DJ, Huber K. Antithrombotic therapy for acute coronary syndrome: past, present and future. Thromb Haemost 2017;117:1240-8. https://doi.org/10.1160/TH16-12-0963
  6. Rollini F, Franchi F, Angiolillo DJ. Switching P2Y12-receptor inhibitors in patients with coronary artery disease. Nat Rev Cardiol 2016;13:11-27. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrcardio.2015.113
  7. Angiolillo DJ, Rollini F, Storey RF, et al. International expert consensus on switching platelet P2Y12 receptor-inhibiting therapies. Circulation 2017;136:1955-75. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.031164
  8. Velders MA, Abtan J, Angiolillo DJ, et al. Safety and efficacy of ticagrelor and clopidogrel in primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Heart 2016;102:617-25. https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2015-308963
  9. Bagai A, Peterson ED, Honeycutt E, et al. In-hospital switching between adenosine diphosphate receptor inhibitors in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with percutaneous coronary intervention: Insights into contemporary practice from the TRANSLATE-ACS study. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care 2015;4:499-508. https://doi.org/10.1177/2048872614564082
  10. Motovska Z, Hlinomaz O, Kala P, et al. 1-year outcomes of patients undergoing primary angioplasty for myocardial infarction treated with prasugrel versus ticagrelor. J Am Coll Cardiol 2018;71:371-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2017.11.008
  11. Amsterdam EA, Wenger NK, Brindis RG, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients with Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014;64:e139-228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2014.09.017
  12. Valgimigli M, Bueno H, Byrne RA, et al. ESC focused update on dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease developed in collaboration with EACTS: The Task Force for dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J 2017;2017:26.
  13. Ibanez B, James S, Agewall S, et al. ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: the Task Force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2017;2017:26.
  14. Roffi M, Patrono C, Collet JP, et al. 2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: Task Force for the Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Patients Presenting without Persistent ST-Segment Elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2016;37:267-315. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehv320
  15. Montalescot G, Wiviott SD, Braunwald E, et al. Prasugrel compared with clopidogrel in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (TRITON-TIMI 38): double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2009;373:723-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60441-4
  16. Wiviott SD, Braunwald E, Angiolillo DJ, et al. Greater clinical benefit of more intensive oral antiplatelet therapy with prasugrel in patients with diabetes mellitus in the trial to assess improvement in therapeutic outcomes by optimizing platelet inhibition with prasugrel-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 38. Circulation 2008;118:1626-36. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.791061
  17. Antman EM, Wiviott SD, Murphy SA, et al. Early and late benefits of prasugrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a TRITON-TIMI 38 (TRial to Assess Improvement in Therapeutic Outcomes by Optimizing Platelet InhibitioN with Prasugrel-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction) analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;51:2028-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2008.04.002
  18. Becker RC, Bassand JP, Budaj A, et al. Bleeding complications with the P2Y12 receptor antagonists clopidogrel and ticagrelor in the PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial. Eur Heart J 2011;32:2933-44. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehr422
  19. Saito S, Isshiki T, Kimura T, et al. Efficacy and safety of adjusted-dose prasugrel compared with clopidogrel in Japanese patients with acute coronary syndrome: the PRASFIT-ACS study. Circ J 2014;78:1684-92. https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-13-1482
  20. Cannon CP, Bhatt DL, Oldgren J, et al. Dual antithrombotic therapy with dabigatran after PCI in atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2017;377:1513-24. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1708454
  21. Alexopoulos D, Xanthopoulou I, Deftereos S, et al. In-hospital switching of oral P2Y12 inhibitor treatment in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: prevalence, predictors and short-term outcome. Am Heart J 2014;167:68-76.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2013.10.010
  22. Clemmensen P, Grieco N, Ince H, et al. MULTInational non-interventional study of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with PRimary Angioplasty and Concomitant use of upstream antiplatelet therapy with prasugrel or clopidogrel--the European MULTIPRAC Registry. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care 2015;4:220-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/2048872614547449
  23. De Luca L, Leonardi S, Cavallini C, et al. Contemporary antithrombotic strategies in patients with acute coronary syndrome admitted to cardiac care units in Italy: The EYESHOT Study. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care 2015;4:441-52. https://doi.org/10.1177/2048872614560505
  24. Bonaca MP, Bhatt DL, Cohen M, et al. Long-term use of ticagrelor in patients with prior myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2015;372:1791-800. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1500857
  25. Alexopoulos D, Xanthopoulou I, Perperis A, et al. Dyspnea in patients treated with P2Y12 receptor antagonists: insights from the GReek AntiPlatElet (GRAPE) registry. Platelets 2017;28:691-7. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537104.2016.1265919
  26. Bonaca MP, Bhatt DL, Oude Ophuis T, et al. Long-term tolerability of ticagrelor for the secondary prevention of major adverse cardiovascular events: a secondary analysis of the PEGASUS-TIMI 54 trial. JAMA Cardiol 2016;1:425-32. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2016.1017
  27. Cuisset T, Deharo P, Quilici J, et al. Benefit of switching dual antiplatelet therapy after acute coronary syndrome: the TOPIC (timing of platelet inhibition after acute coronary syndrome) randomized study. Eur Heart J 2017;38:3070-8. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehx175
  28. Sibbing D, Aradi D, Jacobshagen C, et al. A randomised trial on platelet function-guided de-escalation of antiplatelet treatment in ACS patients undergoing PCI. Rationale and design of the Testing Responsiveness to Platelet Inhibition on Chronic Antiplatelet Treatment for Acute Coronary Syndromes (TROPICAL-ACS) Trial. Thromb Haemost 2017;117:188-95. https://doi.org/10.1160/TH16-07-0557
  29. Sibbing D, Aradi D, Jacobshagen C, et al. Guided de-escalation of antiplatelet treatment in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (TROPICAL-ACS): a randomised, open-label, multicentre trial. Lancet 2017;390:1747-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32155-4
  30. Zettler ME, Peterson ED, McCoy LA, et al. Switching of adenosine diphosphate receptor inhibitor after hospital discharge among myocardial infarction patients: Insights from the Treatment with Adenosine Diphosphate Receptor Inhibitors: Longitudinal Assessment of Treatment Patterns and Events after Acute Coronary Syndrome (TRANSLATE-ACS) observational study. Am Heart J 2017;183:62-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2016.10.006
  31. Motovska Z, Hlinomaz O, Miklik R, et al. Prasugrel versus ticagrelor in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention: multicenter randomized PRAGUE-18 Study. Circulation 2016;134:1603-12. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.024823
  32. De Luca L, D'Ascenzo F, Musumeci G, et al. Incidence and outcome of switching of oral platelet P2Y12 receptor inhibitors in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: the SCOPE registry. EuroIntervention 2017;13:459-66. https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00092
  33. Deharo P, Quilici J, Camoin-Jau L, et al. Benefit of switching dual antiplatelet therapy after acute coronary syndrome according to on-treatment platelet reactivity: the TOPIC-VASP pre-specified analysis of the TOPIC randomized study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2017;10:2560-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2017.08.044
  34. Gurbel PA, Bliden KP, Hiatt BL, O'Connor CM. Clopidogrel for coronary stenting: response variability, drug resistance, and the effect of pretreatment platelet reactivity. Circulation 2003;107:2908-13. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000072771.11429.83
  35. Tantry US, Bonello L, Aradi D, et al. Consensus and update on the definition of on-treatment platelet reactivity to adenosine diphosphate associated with ischemia and bleeding. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;62:2261-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2013.07.101
  36. Gurbel PA, Bliden KP, Samara W, et al. Clopidogrel effect on platelet reactivity in patients with stent thrombosis: results of the CREST Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46:1827-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2005.07.056
  37. Sibbing D, Braun S, Morath T, et al. Platelet reactivity after clopidogrel treatment assessed with point-of-care analysis and early drug-eluting stent thrombosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;53:849-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2008.11.030
  38. Aradi D, Kirtane A, Bonello L, et al. Bleeding and stent thrombosis on P2Y12-inhibitors: collaborative analysis on the role of platelet reactivity for risk stratification after percutaneous coronary intervention. Eur Heart J 2015;36:1762-71. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehv104
  39. Stone GW, Witzenbichler B, Weisz G, et al. Platelet reactivity and clinical outcomes after coronary artery implantation of drug-eluting stents (ADAPT-DES): a prospective multicentre registry study. Lancet 2013;382:614-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61170-8
  40. Cayla G, Cuisset T, Silvain J, et al. Platelet function monitoring to adjust antiplatelet therapy in elderly patients stented for an acute coronary syndrome (ANTARCTIC): an open-label, blinded-endpoint, randomised controlled superiority trial. Lancet 2016;388:2015-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31323-X
  41. Sibbing D, Massberg S. Antiplatelet strategies in elderly people: still a long way to go. Lancet 2016;388:1962-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31387-3
  42. Sibbing D, Gross L, Trenk D, et al. Age and outcomes following guided de-escalation of antiplatelet treatment in acute coronary syndrome patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: results from the randomized TROPICAL-ACS trial. Eur Heart J 2018;39:2749-58. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehy332
  43. Levine GN, Jeong YH, Goto S, et al. Expert consensus document: World Heart Federation expert consensus statement on antiplatelet therapy in East Asian patients with ACS or undergoing PCI. Nat Rev Cardiol 2014;11:597-606. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrcardio.2014.104
  44. Mega JL, Close SL, Wiviott SD, et al. Cytochrome p-450 polymorphisms and response to clopidogrel. N Engl J Med 2009;360:354-62. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0809171
  45. Mega JL, Close SL, Wiviott SD, et al. Genetic variants in ABCB1 and CYP2C19 and cardiovascular outcomes after treatment with clopidogrel and prasugrel in the TRITON-TIMI 38 trial: a pharmacogenetic analysis. Lancet 2010;376:1312-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61273-1
  46. Mega JL, Simon T, Collet JP, et al. Reduced-function CYP2C19 genotype and risk of adverse clinical outcomes among patients treated with clopidogrel predominantly for PCI: a meta-analysis. JAMA 2010;304:1821-30. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2010.1543
  47. Wallentin L, James S, Storey RF, et al.PLATO investigators. Effect of CYP2C19 and ABCB1 single nucleotide polymorphisms on outcomes of treatment with ticagrelor versus clopidogrel for acute coronary syndromes: a genetic substudy of the PLATO trial. Lancet 2010;376:1320-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61274-3

Cited by

  1. Using Pharmacogenetic Testing or Platelet Reactivity Testing to Tailor Antiplatelet Therapy: Are Asians different from Caucasians? vol.13, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.15420/ecr.2018.13.2.eo2
  2. Consequences of escalation and de-escalation of double antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome in real clinical practice vol.2019, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2019-3-90-97
  3. Comparison of the Effects of Ticagrelor and Clopidogrel on Microvascular Dysfunction in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome Using Invasive Physiologic Indices vol.12, pp.10, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1161/circinterventions.119.008105
  4. Towards Personalized Antithrombotic Treatments: Focus on P2Y12 Inhibitors and Direct Oral Anticoagulants vol.58, pp.12, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40262-019-00792-y
  5. Efficacy and Safety of Guideline-Recommended Risk Score-Directed Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After 2nd-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents vol.84, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.cj-19-0667
  6. 2020 Asian Pacific Society of Cardiology Consensus Recommendations on the Use of P2Y12 Receptor Antagonists in the Asia-Pacific Region vol.16, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.15420/ecr.2020.40
  7. Pharmacotherapy for acute myocardial infarction vol.64, pp.2, 2021, https://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2021.64.2.139
  8. Adenosine Receptor Agonist HE-NECA Enhances Antithrombotic Activities of Cangrelor and Prasugrel in vivo by Decreasing of Fibrinogen Density in Thrombus vol.22, pp.6, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22063074
  9. Beginning the Journey to Find Optimal Antithrombotic Regimens for Korean Patients with Atrial Fibrillation after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention vol.51, pp.5, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4070/kcj.2021.0017
  10. Pharmacodynamics and Outcomes of a De-Escalation Strategy with Half-Dose Prasugrel or Ticagrelor in East Asians Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome: Results from HOPE-TAILOR Trial vol.10, pp.12, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10122699