Earthquakes and Structures

Techno-Press (테크노프레스)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Impact of initial damage path and spectral shape on aftershock collapse fragility of RC frames

  • Liu, Yang (College of Architecture and Environment, Sichuan University) ;
  • Yu, Xiao-Hui (Key Lab of Structures Dynamic Behavior and Control of the Ministry of Education, Harbin Institute of Technology) ;
  • Lu, Da-Gang (Key Lab of Structures Dynamic Behavior and Control of the Ministry of Education, Harbin Institute of Technology) ;
  • Ma, Fu-Zi (School of Civil Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology)
  • Received : 2018.06.16
  • Accepted : 2018.09.11
  • Published : 2018.11.25
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The influences of initial damage paths and aftershock (AS) spectral shape on the assessment of AS collapse fragility are investigated. To do this, a four-story ductile reinforced concrete (RC) frame structure is employed as the study case. The far-field earthquake records recommended by FEMA P695 are used as AS ground motions. The AS incremental dynamic analyses are performed for the damaged structure. To examine the effect of initial damage paths, a total of six kinds of initial damage paths are adopted to simulate different initial damage states of the structure by pushover analysis and dynamic analysis. For the pushover-based initial damage paths, the structure is "pushed" using either uniform or triangle lateral load pattern to a specified damage state quantified by the maximum inter-story drift ratio. Among the dynamic initial damage paths, one single mainshock ground motion or a suite of mainshock ground motions are used in the incremental dynamic analyses to generate a specified initial damage state to the structure. The results show that the structure collapse capacity is reduced as the increase of initial damage, and the initial damage paths show a significant effect on the calculated collapse capacities of the damaged structure (especially at severe damage states). To account for the effect of AS spectral shape, the AS collapse fragility can be adjusted at different target values of ${\varepsilon}$ by using the linear correlation model between the collapse capacity (in term of spectral intensity) and the AS ${\varepsilon}$ values, and coefficients of this linear model is found to be associated with the initial damage states.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : National Science Foundation of China

References

  1. Abdelnaby, A.E. (2015), "Numerical modeling and analysis of rc frames subjected to multiple earthquakes", Earthq. Struct., 9(5), 957-981. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2015.9.5.957
  2. Abrahamson, N. and Silva, W. (2008), "Summary of the abrahamson & silva nga ground-motion relations", Earthq. Spectra, 24(1), 67-97. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2924360
  3. American Concrete Institute (ACI) (2002), "Building code requirements for structural concrete and commentary", ACI 318-02/ACI 318R-02, Farmington Hills, MI.
  4. ASCE (2002), "Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures", ASCE 7-02, Reston, VA.
  5. Baker, J.W. and Cornell, C.A. (2005), "A vector-valued ground motion intensity measure consisting of spectral acceleration and epsilon", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 34(10), 1193-1217. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.474
  6. Bazzurro, P. (2006), Advanced Seismic Assessment Guidelines, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center.
  7. Burton, H.V., Sreekumar, S., Sharma, M. and Sun, H. (2017), "Estimating aftershock collapse vulnerability using mainshock intensity, structural response and physical damage indicators", Struct. Saf., 68(85-96).
  8. Dolsek, M. and Fajfar, P. (2004), "In2-a simple alternative for ida", Proceedings of the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, Canada.
  9. Faisal, A., Majid, T.A. and Hatzigeorgiou, G.D. (2013), "Investigation of story ductility demands of inelastic concrete frames subjected to repeated earthquakes", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 44, 42-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2012.08.012
  10. Fema, P. (2009), "695. Quantification of building seismic performance factors", Federal Emergency Management Agency.
  11. Gaetani D'aragona, M., Polese, M., Elwood, K.J., Baradaran Shoraka, M. and Prota, A. (2017), "Aftershock collapse fragility curves for non-ductile RC buildings: A scenario-based assessment", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 46(13), 2083-2102. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2894
  12. Goda, K. (2015), "Record selection for aftershock incremental dynamic analysis", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 44(7), 1157-1162. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2513
  13. Goda, K. and Taylor, C.A. (2012), "Effects of aftershocks on peak ductility demand due to strong ground motion records from shallow crustal earthquakes", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 41(15), 2311-2330. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2188
  14. Goda, K. and Salami, M.R. (2014), "Inelastic seismic demand estimation of wood-frame houses subjected to mainshockaftershock sequences", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 12(2), 855-874. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-013-9534-4
  15. Haselton, C.B., Baker, J.W., Liel, A.B. and Deierlein, G.G. (2009), "Accounting for ground-motion spectral shape characteristics in structural collapse assessment through an adjustment for epsilon", J. Struct. Eng., 137(3), 332-344.
  16. Haselton, C.B. and Deierlein, G.G. (2007), Assessing Seismic Collapse Safety of Modern Reinforced Concrete Moment-frame Buildings, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center.
  17. Haselton, C.B., Liel, A.B., Dean, B.S., Chou, J.H. and Deierlein, G.G. (2007), "Seismic collapse safety and behavior of modern reinforced concrete moment-frame buildings", Am. Soc. Civil Eng., 249, 1-14.
  18. Hatzigeorgiou, G. (2010b), "Behavior factors for nonlinear structures subjected to multiple near-fault earthquakes", Comput. Struct., 88(5-6), 309-321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2009.11.006
  19. Hatzigeorgiou, G.D. (2010a), "Ductility demand spectra for multiple near-and far-fault earthquakes", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 30(4), 170-183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2009.10.003
  20. Hatzigeorgiou, G.D. and Beskos, D.E. (2009), "Inelastic displacement ratios for sdof structures subjected to repeated earthquakes", Eng. Struct., 31(11), 2744-2755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.07.002
  21. Ibarra, L.F., Medina, R.A. and Krawinkler, H. (2005), "Hysteretic models that incorporate strength and stiffness deterioration", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 34(12), 1489-1511. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.495
  22. Iervolino, I., Giorgio, M. and Chioccarelli, E. (2014), "Closedform aftershock reliability of damage-cumulating elasticperfectly-plastic systems", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 43(4), 613-625. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2363
  23. Li, Q. and Ellingwood, B.R. (2007), "Performance evaluation and damage assessment of steel frame buildings under main shock-aftershock earthquake sequences", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 36(3), 405-427. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.667
  24. Li, R., Ge, H. and Maruyama, R. (2017), "Assessment of postearthquake serviceability for steel arch bridges with seismic dampers considering mainshock-aftershock sequences", Earthq. Struct., 13(2), 137-150. https://doi.org/10.12989/EAS.2017.13.2.137
  25. Li, Y., Song, R. and Lindt, J.W.V.D. (2014), "Collapse fragility of steel structures subjected to earthquake mainshock-aftershock sequences", J. Struct. Eng., 140(12), 04014095. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001019
  26. Liu, Y., Paolacci, F. and Lu, D.G. (2017), "Seismic fragility of a typical bridge using extrapolated experimental damage limit states", Earthq. Struct., 13(6), 599-611. https://doi.org/10.12989/EAS.2017.13.6.599
  27. Luco, N., Bazzurro, P. and Cornell, C.A. (2004), "Dynamic versus static computation of the residual capacity of a mainshockdamaged building to withstand an aftershock", 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering.
  28. Mazzoni, S., Mckenna, F., Scott, M.H. and Fenves, G.L. (2006), Opensees Command Language Manual, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research (PEER) Center.
  29. Nazari, N., Van De Lindt, J. and Li, Y. (2013), "Effect of mainshock-aftershock sequences on woodframe building damage fragilities", J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 29(1), 04014036. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000512
  30. Papaloizou, L., Polycarpou, P., Komodromos, P., Hatzigeorgiou, G.D. and Beskos, D.E. (2016), "Two-dimensional numerical investigation of the effects of multiple sequential earthquake excitations on ancient multi-drum columns", Earthq. Struct., 10(3), 495-521. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2016.10.3.495
  31. Polese, M., Di Ludovico, M., Prota, A. and Manfredi, G. (2013), "Damage-dependent vulnerability curves for existing buildings", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 42(6), 853-870. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2249
  32. Raghunandan, M., Liel, A.B. and Luco, N. (2015), "Aftershock collapse vulnerability assessment of reinforced concrete frame structures", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 44(3), 419-439. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2478
  33. Ruiz-Garcia, J. and Aguilar, J.D. (2017), "Influence of modeling assumptions and aftershock hazard level in the seismic response of post-mainshock steel framed buildings", Eng. Struct., 140(437-446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.02.074
  34. Ryu, H., Luco, N., Uma, S. and Liel, A. (2011), "Developing fragilities for mainshock-damaged structures through incremental dynamic analysis", Ninth Pacific Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Auckland, New Zealand.
  35. Tang, Z., Xie, X. and Wang, T. (2016), "Residual seismic performance of steel bridges under earthquake sequence", Earthq. Struct., 11(4), 649-664. https://doi.org/10.12989/EAS.2016.11.4.649
  36. Tesfamariam, S., Goda, K. and Mondal, G. (2015), "Seismic vulnerability of reinforced concrete frame with unreinforced masonry infill due to main shock-aftershock earthquake sequences", Earthq. Spectra, 31(3), 1427-1449. https://doi.org/10.1193/042313EQS111M
  37. Uma, S., Ryu, H., Luco, N., Liel, A. and Raghunandan, M. (2011), "Comparison of main-shock and aftershock fragility curves developed for new zealand and us buildings", Proceedings of the 9th Pacific Conference on Earthquake Engineering Structure Building and Earthquake-Resilient Society, Auckland, New Zealand.
  38. Vamvatsikos, D. and Allin Cornell, C. (2006), "Direct estimation of the seismic demand and capacity of oscillators with multilinear static pushovers through ida", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 35(9), 1097-1117. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.573
  39. Yu, X.H., Li, S., Lu, D.G. and Tao, J (2018), "Collapse capacity of inelastic single-degreeof-freedom systems subjected to mainshockaftershock earthquake sequences", J. Earthq. Eng., 1-24.
  40. Zhai, C.H., Wen, W.P., Li, S., Chen, Z., Chang, Z. and Xie, L.L. (2014), "The damage investigation of inelastic sdof structure under the mainshock-aftershock sequence-type ground motions", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 59(30-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2014.01.003
  41. Zhu, R.G., Lu, D.G., Yu, X.H. and Wang, G.Y. (2017), "Conditional mean spectrum of aftershocks", Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 107(4), 1940-1953.