Earthquakes and Structures

  • 제15권5호
  • /
  • Pages.473-485
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 2092-7614(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2092-7622(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Strengthening techniques for masonry structures of cultural heritage according to recent Croatian provisions

  • Hadzima-Nyarko, Marijana (Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture Osijek, University of J.J. Strossmayer) ;
  • Ademovic, Naida (Faculty of Civil Engineering in Sarajevo, University of Sarajevo) ;
  • Pavic, Gordana (Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture Osijek, University of J.J. Strossmayer) ;
  • Sipos, Tanja Kalman (Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture Osijek, University of J.J. Strossmayer)
  • 투고 : 2018.03.27
  • 심사 : 2018.08.31
  • 발행 : 2018.11.25
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The buildings of architectural and cultural heritage are mostly built with stone or brick wall elements, which are connected using limestone or limestone cement mortar, without a full knowledge of the mechanical properties of masonry structures. The compatibility of heritage masonry buildings with valid technical specifications and the rules for earthquake resistance implies the need for construction work such as repairs, strengthening or reconstruction. By strengthening the masonry buildings, ductility and bearing capacity are increased to a level, which, in the case of the earthquake design, allows for some damage to happen, however the structure retains sufficient usability and bearing capacity without the possibility of collapse. Comparison between traditional and modern techniques for seismic strengthening of masonry buildings is given according to their effects, benefits and disadvantages. Recent Croatian provisions provided for heritage buildings enabling deviation of technical specifications are discussed.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Abrams, D.P. and Lynch, J.M. (2001), "Flexural behavior of retrofitted masonry piers", KEERC-MAE Joint Seminar on Risk Mitigation for Regions of Moderate Seismicity, Illinois, USA.
  2. Ademovic, N. (2011), "Structural and seismic behavior of typical masonry building from Bosnia and Herzegovina", Master's Thesis, Advanced Masters in Structural Analysis of Monuments and Historical Constructions, University of Minho, Guimaraes, Portugal.
  3. Ademovic, N. and Hrasnica, M. (2015), "Capacity degradation and crack pattern development in a multi-storey unreinforced masonry building", Gradevinar, 67(4), 351-361.
  4. Ademovic, N., Kurtovic, A. and Madzarevic, M. (2016), "Structural repair of Careva Cuprija Bridge in Sarajevo", Gradevinar, 68(12), 995-1008.
  5. Altunisik, A.C., Bayraktar, A. and Genc, A.F. (2016), "A study on seismic behaviour of masonry mosques after Restoration", Earthq. Struct., 10(6), 1331-1346. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2016.10.6.1331
  6. Anicic, D. (1982), "Earthquake strengthening of historical monuments in Dubrovnik, Yugoslavia", Proceedings of the VIIth European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Athens, Greece.
  7. Anicic, D. (1988), "Earthquake strengthening of stone masonry belfries in Dubrovnik by prestressing", Proceedings of the 1st International Seminar on Modern Principles in Conservation and Restoration of Urban and Rural Cultural Heritage in Seismic-Prone Regions, Skopje, RZZSK/IZIIS Skopje.
  8. Anicic, D. (1992), "Ten years of cultural monuments rehabilitation in Dubrovnik", Proceedings of the 10th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Madrid, July.
  9. Anicic, D. (1994), "Historic monuments in zones of high seismicity: Vulnerability and strengthening", Ed. A. Rutenberg, Proceedings of the Seventeenth Regional European Seminar on Earthquake Engineering, Haifa, Israel, September.
  10. Anicic, D. (2000), "Croatian and european approach to seismic resistance of immovable cultural assets", Gradevinar, 52, 1-7.
  11. Anicic, D. and Steinman, V. (1983), "Earthquake strengthening of rector's palace in Dubrovnik", Proceedings of the Third South Pacific Regional Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Wellington, New Zealand, May.
  12. Aras, F. and Altay, G. (2015), "Investigation of mechanical properties of masonry in historic buildings", Gradevinar, 67(5), 461-469.
  13. Bonci, A., Carluccio, G., Croci, G. and Viskovic, A. (2001), "Use of shock transmission units and shape memory alloy devices for the seismic protection of monuments: the case of the upper Basilica of San Francisco at Assisi", Proceedings of the 1nternalionai Millennium Congress - More than two thousand years in the history of architecture, UNESCO- ICOMOS, Paris, France.
  14. Cakir, F. and Kocyigit, F. (2016), "Architectural and structural analysis of historical structures", Gradevinar, 68(7), 571-580.
  15. Calvi, G. and Magenes, G. (1994), "Experimental results on unreinforced masonry shear walls damaged and repaired", Proceedings of the 10th IB2MaC, Calgary, Canada.
  16. Castellano, M.G. (2000), "Shaking table tests of masonry facade walls with and SMADs", Proceedings of the Final Workshop of ISTECH Project - Shape Memory Alloy Devices for Seismic Protection of Cultural Heritage Structures, 99-109.
  17. Causevic, A. and Rustempasic, N. (2014), Rekonstrukcije Zidanih Objekata Visokogradnje, Univerzitet u Sarajevu, Arhitektonski fakultet.
  18. Churilov, S. and Dumova-Jovanoska, E. (2013), "In-plane shear behaviour of unreinforced and jacketed brick masonry walls", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 50, 85-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2013.03.006
  19. Chuxian, S., Guiqiu, L. and Wenchao, W. (1997), "The design of brick masonry structure with concrete column", Proceedings of the 11th IB2MaC, Shanghai, China.
  20. ElGawady, M. and Lestuzzi, P. (2004), "A review of conventional seismic retrofitting techniques for URM", Proceedings of the 13th International Brick and Block Masonry Conference, Amsterdam.
  21. EN 1998-1:2004 (2004), Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance, Part 1: General Rules, Seismic Actions and Rules for Buildings, CEN - European Committee for Standardization, Brussels.
  22. EN 1998-3:2005 (2005), Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance, Part 3: Assessment and Retrofitting of Buildings, CEN - European Committee for Standardization, Brussels.
  23. EU Regulation No 305/2011 (Construction Products Regulation, or CPR) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2011, Official Journal of the European Union L88/5,4.4.2011.
  24. Galic, J., Soric, Z. and Rak, M. (2007), "Strengthening masonry walls subjected to shear load", Gradevinar, 59(4), 289-299.
  25. Grubisic, M. (2016), "Models for strengthening assessment of reinforced concrete frames by adding the infills for earthquake action", PhD Thesis, Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of J.J. Strossmayer in Osijek, Croatia.
  26. Hadzima-Nyarko, M. and Kalman Sipos, T. (2017), "Insights from existing earthquake loss assessment research in Croatia", Earthq. Struct., 13(4), 401-411.
  27. Hadzima-Nyarko, M., Misetic, V. and Moric, D. (2017), "Seismic vulnerability assessment of an old historical masonry building in Osijek, Croatia, using Damage Index", J. Cult. Herit., 28, 140-150 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2017.05.012
  28. Hadzima-Nyarko, M., Misetic, V., Loncar-Vickovic, S., Jelec, M. and Moric, D. (2015), "Seismic vulnerability of a historical building in Tvrdja using damage ratio (DR) coefficient", Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Multi-scale Computational Methods for Solids and Fluids, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Sarajevo, June.
  29. HRN EN 15898 (2012), Ocuvanje Kulturnog Dobra - Glavni Opci Nazivi i Definicije (EN 15898:2011), Conservation of Cultural Property - Main General Terms and Definitions.
  30. Indirli, M. and Castellano, M.G. (2008), "Shape memory alloy devices for the structural improvement of masonry heritage structures", Int. J. Arch. Herit., 2(2), 93-119. https://doi.org/10.1080/15583050701636258
  31. Institut za Zemljotresno Inzenjerstvo i Inzenjersku Seizmologiju Univerziteta Kiril i Metodij Skopje (IZIIS) (1971), Seizmicka Mikrorejonizacija Banja Luke, Skopje.
  32. Isik, E. (2016), "Consistency of the rapid assessment method for reinforced concrete buildings", Earthq. Struct., 11(5), 873-885. https://doi.org/10.12989/EAS.2016.11.5.873
  33. Isik, E. and Kutanis, M. (2015), "Performance based assessment for existing residential buildings in Lake Van basin and seismicity of the region", Earthq. Struct., 9(4), 893-910. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2015.9.4.893
  34. Lacanna, G., Ripepe, M., Marchetti, E., Coli, M. and Garzonio, C.A. (2016), "Dynamic response of the Baptistery of San Giovanni in Florence, Italy, based on ambient vibration test", J. Cult. Herit., 20, 632-640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2016.02.007
  35. Marques, A., Candeias, P.X., Veiga, M.R. and Ferreira, J.G. (2014), "Seismic reinforcement techniques for old buildings walls", Proceedings of the 9th International Masonry Conference in Guimaraes.
  36. Moric, D. (2002), "Seismic resistance diagrams for buildings belonging to architectural heritage", Gradevinar, 54(4), 201-209.
  37. Ornelas, C., Miranda Guedes, J. and Breda-Vazquez, I. (2016), "Cultural built heritage and intervention criteria: a systematic analysis of building codes and legislation of Southern European countries", J. Cult. Herit., 20, 725-732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2016.02.013
  38. Pardalopoulos, S.I., Pantazopoulou, S.J. and Ignatakis, C.E. (2016), "Practical seismic assessment of unreinforced masonry historical buildings", Earthq. Struct., 11(2), 195-215. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2016.11.2.195
  39. Preciado, A., Bartoli, G. and Budelmann, H. (2015), "Fundamental aspects on the seismic vulnerability of ancient masonry towers and retrofitting techniques", Earthq. Struct., 9(2), 339-352. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2015.9.2.339
  40. Preciado, A., Bartoli, G. and Ramirez-Gaytan, A. (2017). "Earthquake protection of the Torre Grossa Medieval Tower of San Gimignano, Italy by vertical external prestressing", Eng. Fail. Anal., 71, 31-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2016.11.005
  41. Preciado, A., Ramirez-Gaytan, A., Gutierrez, N., Vargas, D., Falcon, J.M. and Ochoa, G. (2018), "Nonlinear earthquake capacity of slender old masonry structures prestressed with steel, FRP and NiTi SMA tendons", Steel Compos. Struct., 26(2), 213-226. https://doi.org/10.12989/SCS.2018.26.2.213
  42. Preciado, A., Sperbeck, S.T. and Ramirez-Gaytan, A. (2016), "Seismic vulnerability enhancement of medieval and masonry bell towers externally prestressed with unbonded smart tendons", Eng. Struct., 122, 50-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.05.007
  43. Qi, N., Zezhen, Z., Jianyou, C. and Runtao, Y. (1984), "A study of aseismic strengthening for multi-story brick building by additional R/C columns", Proceedings of the 8th WCEE, USA, 591-598.
  44. Radic, J., Bleiziffer, J. and Tkalcic, D. (2008), "Gospodarenje graCevinama, Betonske konstrukcije 4: Sanacije, Hrvatska sveucilisna naklada", GraCevinski fakultet Sveucilista u Zagrebu, Secon HDGK, Andris.
  45. Rodrigues, H., Furtado, A., Nelson Vila-Pouca, N., Varum, H. and Barbosa, A.R. (2018), "Seismic assessment of a school building in Nepal and analysis of retrofitting solutions", Int. J. Civil Eng., doi: 10.1007/s40999-018-0297-9
  46. Schuller, M., Atkinson, R. and Borgsmiller, J. (1994), "Injection grouting for repair and retrofit of unreinforced masonry", Proceedings of the 10th IB2MaC, Calgary, Canada.
  47. Shrestha, H., Pradhan, S. and Guragain, R. (2012), "Experiences on retrofitting of low strength masonry buildings by different retrofitting technique in Nepal", Proceedings of 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Lisabon, Portugal.
  48. Soric, Z. (2016), Masonry Structures, Zagreb. (in Croatian)
  49. Souami, M.A., Zerouala, M.S. and Ait-Meziane, Y. (2016). "The impact of building proportions in the preservation of Algiers architectural heritage against the seismic hazards", J. Cult. Herit., 20, 686-693.
  50. Spanic, M., Hadzima-Nyarko, M. and Moric, D. (2012), "Strengthening of historical buildings with composite polymers", Elec. J. Facult. Civil Eng., OSIJEK-E-GFOS, 5, 74-85.
  51. Taghdi, M. (2000), "Seismic retrofit of low-rise masonry and concrete walls by steel strips", PhD Dissertation, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
  52. Tehnicki Propis za GraCevinske Konstrukcije (2017), Technical Specifications for Buildings, Official Gazette 17/2017.
  53. Tomazevic, M. (2000), "Seismic rehabilitation of existing masonry structures", Gradevinar, 52(11), 683-693. (in Croatian)
  54. Tzanakis, M.J., Papagiannopoulos, G.A. and Hatzigeorgiou, G.D. (2016), "Seismic response and retrofitting proposals of the St. Titus Church, Heraklion, Crete, Greece", Earthq. Struct., 10(6), 1347-1367. https://doi.org/10.12989/EAS.2016.10.6.1347
  55. UNESCO Mexico City Declaration on Cultural Policies (1982), World Conference on Cultural Policies, Mexico City.
  56. UNESCO World Heritage List, http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/
  57. Zakon o Gradnji (Construction Law) (2013), Official Gazette 153/2013, Croatia.
  58. Zakon o Zastiti i Ocuvanju Kulturnih Dobara (Law on the Protection and Conservation of Cultural Goods) (1999), Official Gazette 69/99, Croatia.

피인용 문헌

  1. Experimental Study on Seismic Behavior of Masonry Walls Strengthened by Reinforced Mortar Cross Strips vol.11, pp.18, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/su11184866
  2. Observation of behavior of the Ahlat Gravestones (TURKEY) at seismic risk and their recognition by QR code vol.72, pp.5, 2018, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2019.72.5.643
  3. Ultimate shear strength prediction model for unreinforced masonry retrofitted externally with textile reinforced mortar vol.19, pp.6, 2018, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2020.19.6.411
  4. Application of Shape Memory Alloys in Retrofitting of Masonry and Heritage Structures Based on Their Vulnerability Revealed in the Bam 2003 Earthquake vol.14, pp.16, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14164480
  5. Non-linear Pushover Analysis and simulation of progressive collapse mechanisms using FE Models for Nativity Church vol.21, pp.2, 2021, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2021.21.2.185