DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A study on regulatory approach to sharing economy platform

공유경제 플랫폼 규제접근방법에 대한 연구

  • Received : 2018.07.09
  • Accepted : 2018.08.01
  • Published : 2018.10.31

Abstract

This paper proposes a desirable regulatory measure for the rapidly growing shared economic platform. The development and innovation of digital technology is expected to create new services and new economic and industrial values, but it also raises concerns, challenges about social trust issues arising from conflicts of interest with existing industries. Although sharing economies also creates new forms of supply and demand and grows rapidly around the world with innovative trading methods, institutional limitations are still being exposed in the major cities in terms of conflicts with existing industrial values. In order to reduce the social costs associated with the regulatory process and reach the appropriate regulatory policy goal, this paper proposes a co-regulation approach considering the sharing economic characteristics.

본 논문은 최근 급성장하고 있는 공유경제플랫폼에 대한 바람직한 규제 방안을 논하고 있다. 디지털 기술의 발전과 혁신은 새로운 서비스, 새로운 경제, 산업 가치의 창출이라는 기대도 큰 반면, 기존 산업과의 이해 충돌에서 발생하는 사회적 신뢰 문제에 대한 우려와 도전, 과제들을 야기한다. 공유경제 역시 새로운 수요와 공급을 창출하고 혁신적인 거래방식으로 전 세계적으로 빠른 성장을 하고 있지만, 아직도 주요 도시에서는 기존 산업 가치와의 충돌이 야기하는 문제에 대해 제도적 측면에서의 한계점이 노출되고 있다. 본 연구는 이러한 문제점을 최소화하기 위해 일정 수준의 규제가 필요함을 전제로 규제과정에서 수반되는 사회적 비용 최소화를 위해서 공유경제 특성을 고려한 공동규제(Co-regulation) 접근방안이 바람직함을 제안하고 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. Koopman, C., Mitchell, M., & Thierer, A., "The sharing economy and consumer protection regulation: The case for policy change," J. Bus. Entrepreneurship & L., 8, 529, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2535345
  2. K. C. Park & S.D.Lee, Digital Sharing Economy for City․ Social Innovation, 2017.
  3. Katz, M. L., & Shapiro, C., "Network externalities, competition, and compatibility," The American economic review, 75(3), 424-440, 1985.
  4. Puschmann, T., & Alt, R. Sharing economy. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 58(1), 93-99, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12599-015-0420-2
  5. Forbes, Breaking Down Uber's Valuation: An Interactive Analysis, 2018.2.22.
  6. Rohit Kulkarni, The Case for Airbnb's $50 billion IPO in 2018, 2017.3.22. https://sharespost.com/insights/blog/the-case-for-airbnbs-50-billion-ipo-in-2018/
  7. Sara Ashley O'Brien, Nelli Black, "Curt Devine and Drew Griffin," CNN investigation: 103 Uber drivers accused of sexual assault or abuse, 2018.4.30. http://money.cnn.com/2018/04/30/technology/uber-driv er-sexual-assault/index.html
  8. D.J. Park, "Against Uber Taxi", 3,000 taxi drivers gather at Seoul Plaza, Yunhap news, http://www.yonhapnews.co.kr/society/2014/11/18/07010 00000AKR20141118141851004.HTML
  9. Sauchelli, D., & Golding, B., "Hookers turning Airbnb apartments into brothels," New York Post, 2014. https://nypost.com/2014/04/14/hookers-using-airbnb-to-use-apartments-for-sex-sessions/
  10. Malhotra, A., & Van Alstyne, M., "The dark side of the sharing economy... and how to lighten it," Communications of the ACM, 57(11), 24-27, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2668893
  11. Cannon, B. & Chung, H., "A framework for designing co-regulation models well-adapted to technologyfacilitated sharing economies," Santa Clara Computer & High Tech. LJ, 31, 23, 2014.
  12. Gata, J. E., "The Sharing Economy, Competition and Regulation," CPI Europe Column. Saantitapa, 2015. https://www.competitionpolicyinternational.com/thesharing-economy-competition-and-regulation.
  13. Miller, S. R., "First principles for regulating the sharing economy," Harv. J. on Legis., 53, 147, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2568016
  14. US Federal Trade Commission. "The "Sharing Economy," Issues Facing Platforms, Participants & Regulators," An FTC Staff Report, 2016.
  15. Kim, Min Jung, Government Policy for the Stable Growth of the Sharing Economy (July 11, 2017). KDI FOCUS (No. 83, kor.). https://ssrn.com/abstract=3000674
  16. Cho, D., & Song, I., "A Study on the Strategy of Platform Operator for Free Mobile Data : from the Perspectives of Business Opportunity and Risk." Journal of Internet Computing and Services, 18(5), 123-131, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.7472/jksii.2017.18.5.123
  17. Miller, S. R., "First principles for regulating the sharing economy," Harv. J. on Legis., 53, 147, 2016.
  18. Dyal-Chand, Rashmi, "Regulating Sharing: The Sharing Economy as an Alternative Capitalist System," Tulane Law Review, Vol. 90, No. 2, pp. 241-309, 2015. Northeastern University School of Law Research Paper No. 258-2016. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2743959
  19. Parker, G. G., Van Alstyne, M. W., & Choudary, S. P., Platform revolution. How networked markets are transforming the economy and how to make them work for you, 2016.
  20. B.S.Choi, Government Regulation-Political Economy of Regulation and Deregulation, p.860, BeobMunSa, 2010.
  21. Amsterdam. Action plan sharing economy.
  22. Seoul City Press, Participated in five major cities such as New York and Seoul and launched the 'International Shared Cities Association' [Press release], 2017.
  23. Seoul Innovation Planning Officer, Sharing City Seoul Promotion planning, 2012
  24. Y.S.Choi, "A Study of Co-regulation Systems in Korea," KIPA Research report 2008-02.
  25. EC., Clarification of applicable legal framework for full, co- or self-regulatory actions in the cloud computing sector, 2017. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/clarification-applicable-legal-framework-full-co-or-self-regulatory-actions-cloud-computing-0
  26. Y.H.Sim, "Who Should Be the Agency of Self-Regulation of Cyber Sexual Violence?: Based on In-Depth Interviews of ISP (Internet Service Providers) workers," Informatization Policy, 9(2), 54-74.
  27. FCC. In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom Declaratory Ruling, Report and Order, and Order, 2017.
  28. J.Juh. [ICT reverse discrimination dispute in this year] Soundtrack, game, startup has been discriminated reversely in domestic area. Financial news, 2017. http://www.fnnews.com/news/201712121856156836
  29. https://www.cedr.com/cisas/customerinformation/(2018.6.30.)