Steel and Composite Structures

  • 제29권3호
  • /
  • Pages.301-308
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 1229-9367(pISSN)
  • /
  • 1598-6233(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of face-sheet materials on the flexural behavior of aluminum foam sandwich

  • Xiao, Wei (Key Laboratory for Special Area Highway Engineering of Ministry of Education, Chang'an University) ;
  • Yan, Chang (Key Laboratory of Road Construction Technology & Equipment of Chang'an University, MOE) ;
  • Tian, Weibo (Key Laboratory of Road Construction Technology & Equipment of Chang'an University, MOE) ;
  • Tian, Weiping (Key Laboratory for Special Area Highway Engineering of Ministry of Education, Chang'an University) ;
  • Song, Xuding (Key Laboratory of Road Construction Technology & Equipment of Chang'an University, MOE)
  • 투고 : 2017.11.09
  • 심사 : 2018.10.15
  • 발행 : 2018.11.10
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Properties of AFS vary with the changes in the face-sheet materials. Hence, the performance of AFS can be optimized by selecting face-sheet materials. In this work, three types of face-sheet materials representing elastic-perfectly plastic, elastic-plastic strain hardening and purely elastic materials were employed to study their effects on the flexural behavior and failure mechanism of AFS systematically. Result showed face-sheet materials affected the failure mechanism and energy absorption ability of AFS significantly. When the foam cores were sandwiched by aluminum alloy 6061, the AFS failed by face-sheet yielding and crack without collapse of the foam core, there was no clear plastic platform in the Load-Displacement curve. When the foam cores were sandwiched by stainless steel 304 and carbon fiber fabric, there were no face-sheet crack and the sandwich structure failed by core shear and collapse, plastic platform appeared. Energy absorption abilities of steel and carbon fiber reinforced AFS were much higher than aluminum alloy reinforced one. Carbon fiber was suggested as the best choice for AFS for its light weight and high performance. The versus strength ratio of face sheet to core was suggested to be a significant value for AFS structure design which may determine the failure mechanism of a certain AFS structure.

키워드

과제정보

연구 과제 주관 기관 : Central Universities

참고문헌

  1. Aldoshan, A. and Khanna, S. (2017), "Effect of relative density on the dynamic compressive behavior of carbon nano-tube reinforced aluminum foam", Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 689, 17-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2017.01.100
  2. Ashby, M.F., Evans, A.G., Fleck, N.A., Gibson, L.J., Hutchinson, J.W. and Wadley, H.N.G. (2000), Metalfoams: A Design Guide, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, UK.
  3. Cheng, S.L., Zhao, X.Y., Xin, Y.J., Du, S.Y. and Li, H.J. (2015), "Quasi-static localized indentation tests on integrated sandwich panel of aluminum foam and epoxy resin", Compos. Struct., 129, 157-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.04.005
  4. Crupi, V., Epasto, G. and Guglielmino, E. (2013), "Comparison of aluminium sandwiches for lightweight ship structures: Honeycomb vs. foam", Marine Struct., 30, 74-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marstruc.2012.11.002
  5. Gibson, L.J. and Ashby, M.F. (1997), Cellular Solids: Structure and Properties, (2nd Ed.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
  6. Han, M.S. and Cho, J.U. (2014), "Impact damage behavior of sandwich composite with aluminum foam core", Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China, 24, 42-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1003-6326(14)63026-0
  7. Hao, Q.X., Qiu, S.W. and Hu, Y.B. (2015), "Development on preparation technology of aluminum foam sandwich panels", Rare Metal Mater. Eng., 44(3), 548-552. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1875-5372(15)30036-9
  8. Jing, L., Wang, Z. and Zhao, L. (2013), "Dynamic response of cylindrical sandwich shells with metallic foam cores under blast loading and Numerical simulations", Compos. Struct., 99, 213-223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.12.013
  9. Kabir, K., Vodenitcharova, T. and Hoffman, M. (2014), "Response of aluminium foam-cored sandwich panels to bending load", Composites: Part B, 64, 24-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.04.003
  10. Li, Z., Chen, X., Jiang, B. and Lu, F. (2016), "Local indentation of aluminum foam core sandwich beams at elevated temperatures", Compos. Struct., 145, 142-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.02.083
  11. Liu, C., Zhang, Y.X. and Ye, L. (2017), "High velocity impact responses of sandwich panels with metal fibre laminate skins and aluminium foam core", Int. J. Impact Eng., 100, 139-153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2016.09.004
  12. Lu, G. and Yu, T.X. (2003), Energy Absorption of Structures and Materials, Woodhead Publishing Ltd., Cambridge, UK.
  13. Mohan, K., Hon, Y.T., Idapalapati, S. and Seow, H.P. (2005), "Failure of sandwich beams consisting of alumina face sheet and aluminum foam core in bending", Materials Science and Engineering A, 409(1-2), 292-301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2005.06.070
  14. Mohan, K., Yip, T.H., Idapalapati, S. and Chen, Z. (2011), "Impact response of aluminum foam core sandwich structures", Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 529, 94-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2011.08.066
  15. Nammi, S.K., Edwards, G. and Shirvani, H. (2016), "Effect of cell-size on the energy absorption features of closed-cell aluminium foams", Acta Astronautica, 128, 243-250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2016.06.047
  16. Rajaneesh, A., Sridhar, I. and Rajendran, S. (2012), "Impact modeling of foam cored sandwich plates with ductile or brittle faceplates", Compos. Struct., 94(5), 1745-1754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.12.021
  17. Rajaneesh, A., Sridhar, I. and Rajendran, S. (2014), "Relative performance of metal and polymeric foam sandwich plates under low velocity impact", Int. J. Impact Eng., 65, 126-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2013.11.012
  18. Steeves, C.A. and Fleck, N.A. (2004), "Collapse mechanisms of sandwich beams with composite faces and a foam core, loaded in three-point bending. Part II: experimental investigation and numerical modelling", Int. J. Mech. Sci., 46, 585-608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2004.04.004
  19. Styles, M., Compston, P. and Kalyanasundaram, S. (2017), "The effect of core thickness on the flexural behavior of aluminum foam sandwich structures", Compos. Struct., 80(4), 532-538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2006.07.002
  20. Wang, Y., Ren, X., Hou, H., Zhang, Y. and Yan, W. (2015), "Processing and pore structure of aluminium foam sandwich", Powder Technology, 275, 344-350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2015.01.066
  21. Xu, A., Vodenitcharova, T., Kabir, K., Flores-Johnson, E.A. and Hoffman, M. (2014), "Finite element analysis of indentation of aluminum foam and sandwich panels with aluminum foam core", Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 599,125-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2014.01.080
  22. Yan, C. and Song, X. (2016), "Effects of foam core density and face-sheet thickness on the mechanical properties of aluminum foam sandwich", Steel Compos. Struct., Int. J., 21(5), 1145-1156. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2016.21.5.1145
  23. Zhang, B., Lin, Y., Li, S., Zhai, D. and Wu, G. (2016), "Quasistatic and high strain rates compressive behavior of aluminum matrix syntactic foams", Compos. Part B, 98, 288-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.05.034
  24. Zu, G.Y., Lu, R.H., Li, X.B., Zhong, Z.Y., Han, M.B. and Yao, G.C. (2013), "Three-point bending behavior of aluminum foam sandwich with steel panel", Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China, 23(9), 2491-2495. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1003-6326(13)62759-4