Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences

  • 제31권11호
  • /
  • Pages.1691-1699
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 1011-2367(pISSN)
  • /
  • 1976-5517(eISSN)
아세아태평양축산학회 (Asian Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Genetic diversity and divergence among Korean cattle breeds assessed using a BovineHD single-nucleotide polymorphism chip

  • Kim, Seungchang (Animal Genetic Resources Center, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Cheong, Hyun Sub (Department of Genetic Epidemiology, SNP Genetics, Inc.) ;
  • Shin, Hyoung Doo (Department of Genetic Epidemiology, SNP Genetics, Inc.) ;
  • Lee, Sung-Soo (Animal Genetic Resources Center, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Roh, Hee-Jong (Animal Genetic Resources Center, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Jeon, Da-Yeon (Animal Genetic Resources Center, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Cho, Chang-Yeon (Animal Genetic Resources Center, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA)
  • 투고 : 2017.05.31
  • 심사 : 2018.06.22
  • 발행 : 2018.11.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Objective: In Korea, there are three main cattle breeds, which are distinguished by coat color: Brown Hanwoo (BH), Brindle Hanwoo (BRH), and Jeju Black (JB). In this study, we sought to compare the genetic diversity and divergence among there Korean cattle breeds using a BovineHD chip genotyping array. Methods: Sample data were collected from 168 cattle in three populations of BH (48 cattle), BRH (96 cattle), and JB (24 cattle). The single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotyping was performed using the Illumina BovineHD SNP 777K Bead chip. Results: Heterozygosity, used as a measure of within-breed genetic diversity, was higher in BH (0.293) and BRH (0.296) than in JB (0.266). Linkage disequilibrium decay was more rapid in BH and BRH than in JB, reaching an average $r^2$ value of 0.2 before 26 kb in BH and BRH, whereas the corresponding value was reached before 32 kb in JB. Intra-population, interpopulation, and Fst analyses were used to identify candidate signatures of positive selection in the genome of a domestic Korean cattle population and 48, 11, and 11 loci were detected in the genomic region of the BRH breed, respectively. A Neighbor-Joining phylogenetic tree showed two main groups: a group comprising BH and BRH on one side and a group containing JB on the other. The runs of homozygosity analysis between Korean breeds indicated that the BRH and JB breeds have high inbreeding within breeds compared with BH. An analysis of differentiation based on a high-density SNP chip showed differences between Korean cattle breeds and the closeness of breeds corresponding to the geographic regions where they are evolving. Conclusion: Our results indicate that although the Korean cattle breeds have common features, they also show reliable breed diversity.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Bovine HapMap C, Gibbs RA, Taylor JF, et al. Genome-wide survey of SNP variation uncovers the genetic structure of cattle breeds. Science 2009;324:528-32. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1167936
  2. Shin D, Lee C, Park K-D, Kim H, Cho K-H. Genome-association analysis of Korean Holstein milk traits using genomic estimated breeding value. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2017;30:309-19.
  3. Ben Jemaa S, Boussaha M, Ben Mehdi M, Lee JH, Lee S-H. Genome-wide insights into population structure and genetic history of tunisian local cattle using the illumina bovinesnp50 beadchip. BMC Genomics 2015;16:677. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-015-1638-6
  4. Aslam ML, Bastiaansen JW, Elferink MG, et al. Whole genome SNP discovery and analysis of genetic diversity in Turkey (Meleagris gallopavo). BMC Genomics 2012;13:391. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-13-391
  5. McKay SD, Schnabel RD, Murdoch BM, et al. An assessment of population structure in eight breeds of cattle using a whole genome SNP panel. BMC Genet 2008;9:37.
  6. Canon J, Alexandrino P, Bessa I, et al. Genetic diversity measures of local European beef cattle breeds for conservation purposes. Genet Sel Evol 2001;33:311-32. https://doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-33-3-311
  7. Uzzaman MR, Edea Z, Bhuiyan MSA, et al. Genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphism analyses reveal genetic diversity and structure of wild and domestic cattle in Bangladesh. Asian-Australas J Aim Sci 2014;27:1381-6. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2014.14160
  8. Edea Z, Bhuiyan MSA, Dessie T, et al. Genome-wide genetic diversity, population structure and admixture analysis in African and Asian cattle breeds. Animal 2015;9:218-26. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731114002560
  9. Toro MA, Caballero A. Characterization and conservation of genetic diversity in subdivided populations. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 2005;360:1367-78. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2005.1680
  10. Flint APF, Woolliams JA. Precision animal breeding. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 2008;363:573-90. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2007.2171
  11. Yoon DH, Park EW, Lee SH, et al. Assessment of genetic diversity and relationships between Korean cattle and other cattle breeds by microsatellite loci. J Anim Sci Technol 2005;47:341-54. https://doi.org/10.5187/JAST.2005.47.3.341
  12. Yoon DH, Kwon YS, Lee KY, et al. Discrimination of Korean cattle (Hanwoo) using DNA markers derived from SNPs in bovine mitochondrial and SRY genes. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2008;21:25-8. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2008.70209
  13. Lee SH, Kim HC, Cho YM, et al. Genomic information and its application in Hanwoo (Korean native cattle) Breeding program - a mini review. Ann Anim Resour Sci 2011;22:125-33.
  14. Lim DJ, Choi BH, Cho YM, et al. Analysis of extended haplotype in Korean cattle (Hanwoo) population. BMB Rep 2016;49:514-9. https://doi.org/10.5483/BMBRep.2016.49.9.074
  15. Kim Y, Stephan W. Detecting a local signature of genetic hitchhiking along a recombining chromosome. Genetics 2002;160:765-77.
  16. Bovine Genome S, Analysis C, Elsik CG, et al. The genome sequence of taurine cattle: a window to ruminant biology and evolution. Science 2009;324:522-8. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1169588
  17. Gautier M, Vitalis R. rehh: an R package to detect footprints of selection in genome-wide SNP data from haplotype structure. Bioinformatics 2012;28:1176-7. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts115
  18. Browning Sharon R, Browning Brian L. Rapid and accurate haplotype phasing and missing-data inference for wholegenome association studies by use of localized haplotype clustering. Am J Hum Genet 2007;81:1084-97. https://doi.org/10.1086/521987
  19. Weir BS, Cockerham CC. Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 1984;38:1358-70.
  20. Ke X, Hunt S, Tapper W, et al. The impact of SNP density on fine-scale patterns of linkage disequilibrium. Hum Mol Genet 2004;13:577-88. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddh060
  21. Boyles AL, Scott WK, Martin ER, et al. Linkage disequilibrium inflates type i error rates in multipoint linkage analysis when parental genotypes are missing. Hum Hered 2005;59:220-7. https://doi.org/10.1159/000087122
  22. Barbato M, Orozco-terWengel P, Tapio M, Bruford MW. SNeP: a tool to estimate trends in recent effective population size trajectories using genome-wide SNP data. Front Genet 2015;6:109.
  23. Purfield DC, Berry DP, McParland S, Bradley DG. Runs of homozygosity and population history in cattle. BMC Genet 2012;13:70.
  24. Han TW, Kim SK, Jeon Y. The classification and distribution of Korean cattle tick. Rural Res Report, RDA; 1966. pp. 91-103. (in Korea)
  25. Sharma A, Lim D, Chai HH, Choi BH, Cho Y. Demographic trends in Korean native cattle explained using bovine SNP50 beadchip. Genomics Inform 2016;14:230-3. https://doi.org/10.5808/GI.2016.14.4.230
  26. Strucken EM, Lee SH, Jang GW, Porto-Neto LR, Gondro C. Towards breed formation by island model divergence in Korean cattle. BMC Evol Biol 2015;15:284. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-015-0563-2
  27. Perez O'Brien AM, Meszaros G, Utsunomiya YT, et al. Linkage disequilibrium levels in Bos indicus and Bos taurus cattle using medium and high density SNP chip data and different minor allele frequency distributions. Livest Sci 2014;166:121-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2014.05.007
  28. Voight BF, Kudaravalli S, Wen X, Pritchard JK. A map of recent positive selection in the human genome. PLoS Biol 2006;4:e72. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0040072
  29. Tang K, Thornton KR, Stoneking M. A new approach for using genome scans to detect recent positive selection in the human genome. PLoS Biol 2007;5:e171. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0050171
  30. Matukumalli LK, Lawley CT, Schnabel RD, et al. Development and characterization of a high density SNP genotyping assay for cattle. PLoS One 2009;4:e5350. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005350
  31. Reyer H, Shirali M, Ponsuksili S, et al. Exploring the genetics of feed efficiency and feeding behaviour traits in a pig line highly selected for performance characteristics. Mol Genet Genomics 2017;292:1001-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00438-017-1325-1
  32. Do DN, Strathe AB, Ostersen T, et al. Genome-wide association study reveals genetic architecture of eating behavior in pigs and its implications for humans obesity by comparative mapping. PLoS ONE 2013;8:e71509. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0071509
  33. Wittwer C, Hamann H, Distl O. The candidate gene XIRP2 at a quantitative gene locus on equine chromosome 18 associated with osteochondrosis in fetlock and hock joints of south German coldblood horses. J Hered 2009;100:481-6. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhered/esp006
  34. Nie C, Zhang Z, Zheng J, et al. Genome-wide association study revealed genomic regions related to white/red earlobe color trait in the Rhode Island Red chickens. BMC Genet 2016;17:115.
  35. Gutierrez-Gil B, Wiener P, Williams JL. Genetic effects on coat colour in cattle: dilution of eumelanin and phaeomelanin pigments in an F2-Backcross Charolais $\times$ Holstein population. BMC Genet 2007;8:56.
  36. Ponsuksili S, Murani E, Trakooljul N, Schwerin M, Wimmers K. Discovery of candidate genes for muscle traits based on GWAS supported by eQTL-analysis. Int J Biol Sci 2014;10:327-37. https://doi.org/10.7150/ijbs.8134
  37. Zhang F, Zhang Z, Yan X, et al. Genome-wide association studies for hematological traits in Chinese Sutai pigs. BMC Genet 2014;15:41.
  38. Kirin M, McQuillan R, Franklin CS, et al. Genomic runs of homozygosity record population history and consanguinity. PLOS One 2010;5:e13996. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0013996
  39. Lim DJ, Lee SH, Choi BH, et al. Identification of selection signals in Chikso (Brindle Hanwoo) using Rsb method. J Agric Life Sci 2014;48:207-16.
  40. Seo K, Mohanty TR, Choi T, Hwang I. Biology of epidermal and hair pigmentation in cattle: a mini-review. Vet Dermatol 2007;18:392-400. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3164.2007.00634.x
  41. Choi TJ, Lee SS, Cho KH, et al. Genetic diversity of traditional Korean cattle breeds based on microsatellite polymorphisms. J Agric Life Sci 2015;49:37-46.

피인용 문헌

  1. Identifying Loci Under Positive Selection in Yellow Korean Cattle (Hanwoo) vol.15, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1177/1176934319859001
  2. 단일염기다형성 마커를 이용한 백우 품종 식별 방법 vol.21, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.5762/kais.2020.21.1.240
  3. Signatures of positive selection underlying beef production traits in Korean cattle breeds vol.62, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.5187/jast.2020.62.3.293
  4. The Identification of Runs of Homozygosity Gives a Focus on the Genetic Diversity and Adaptation of the “Charolais de Cuba” Cattle vol.10, pp.12, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10122233
  5. Inbreeding coefficients and runs of homozygosity islands in Brazilian water buffalo vol.104, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2020-18397
  6. Genome-Wide Association Study Identifies Candidate Genes Associated with Feet and Leg Conformation Traits in Chinese Holstein Cattle vol.11, pp.8, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11082259
  7. Unraveling the Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of Bangladeshi Indigenous Cattle Populations Using 50K SNP Markers vol.11, pp.8, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11082381
  8. Genome analyses revealed genetic admixture and selection signatures in Bos indicus vol.11, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-01144-2