DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Efficacy of Endoscopic Electrocauterization for Recurrent Posterior Epistaxis

반복되는 후방 비출혈에서 내시경 지혈술의 효과

  • Lee, Jung Joo (Departments of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Eunkyu (Departments of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Ryu, Gwanghui (Departments of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Seo, Min Young (Departments of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Hong, Sang Duk (Departments of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Hyo Yeol (Departments of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Dhong, Hun-Jong (Departments of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Chung, Seung-Kyu (Departments of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine)
  • 이정주 (성균관대학교 의과대학 삼성서울병원 이비인후-두경부외과학교실) ;
  • 이은규 (성균관대학교 의과대학 삼성서울병원 이비인후-두경부외과학교실) ;
  • 류광희 (성균관대학교 의과대학 삼성서울병원 이비인후-두경부외과학교실) ;
  • 서민영 (성균관대학교 의과대학 삼성서울병원 이비인후-두경부외과학교실) ;
  • 홍상덕 (성균관대학교 의과대학 삼성서울병원 이비인후-두경부외과학교실) ;
  • 김효열 (성균관대학교 의과대학 삼성서울병원 이비인후-두경부외과학교실) ;
  • 동헌종 (성균관대학교 의과대학 삼성서울병원 이비인후-두경부외과학교실) ;
  • 정승규 (성균관대학교 의과대학 삼성서울병원 이비인후-두경부외과학교실)
  • Received : 2017.08.18
  • Accepted : 2017.12.05
  • Published : 2018.11.30

Abstract

Background and Objectives: To investigate the common site of recurrent epistaxis after initial intervention such as packing and cauterization had failed and to evaluate the efficacy of surgical endoscopic electrocautery. Subjects and Method: Retrospective review of 47 patients with recurrent and uncontrolled idiopathic epistaxis between October 1995 and March 2016. All patients underwent endoscopic examination in the operating room after hospitalization. We performed electrocautery when a bleeding site was found. Results: The most common sites of bleeding were the inferior meatus (28%), sphenoethmoid recess (23%), superior septum around the olfactory cleft (13%), and the posterior end of the middle turbinate (15%). There was no serious complication during the one week after surgery. In 46 (98%) patients, refractory epistaxis was successfully controlled. One patient had recurrent epistaxis after electrocautery and underwent endoscopic sphenopalatine artery ligation. Conclusion: In patients with refractory idiopathic epistaxis after failure of first-line treatment, endoscopic examination through a surgical approach and electrocautery for suspected bleeding are effective.

Keywords

References

  1. Rudmik L, Smith TL. Management of intractable spontaneous epistaxis. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2012;26(1):55-60. https://doi.org/10.2500/ajra.2012.26.3696
  2. Reyre A, Michel J, Santini L, Dessi P, Vidal V, Bartoli JM, et al. Epistaxis: The role of arterial embolization. Diagn Interv Imaging 2015;96(7-8):757-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diii.2015.06.006
  3. Parajuli R. Evaluation of Etiology and Treatment Methods for Epistaxis: A Review at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Central Nepal. Int J Otolaryngol 2015;2015:283854.
  4. Zou Y, Deng YQ, Xiao CW, Kong YG, Xu Y, Tao ZZ, et al. Comparison of outcomes between endoscopic surgery and conventional nasal packing for epistaxis in the posterior fornix of the inferior nasal meatus. Pak J Med Sci 2015;31(6):1361-5.
  5. Rudmik L, Leung R. Cost-effectiveness analysis of endoscopic sphenopalatine artery ligation vs arterial embolization for intractable epistaxis. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2014;140(9):802-8. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoto.2014.1450
  6. Kumar S, Shetty A, Rockey J, Nilssen E. Contemporary surgical treatment of epistaxis. What is the evidence for sphenopalatine artery ligation? Clinical Otolaryngology & Allied Sciences 2003;28(4):360-3. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2273.2003.00724.x
  7. Elden L, Montanera W, Terbrugge K, Willinsky R, Lasjaunias P, Charles D. Angiographic embolization for the treatment of epistaxis: a review of 108 cases. Otolaryngology--Head and Neck Surgery 1994;111(1):44-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/019459989411100110
  8. Bent JP, Wood BP. Complications resulting from treatment of severe posterior epistaxis. The Journal of Laryngology & Otology 1999;113(03):252-4. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022215100143701
  9. Brinjikji W, Kallmes DF, Cloft HJ. Trends in epistaxis embolization in the United States: a study of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample 2003-2010. Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology 2013;24(7):969-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2013.02.035
  10. Liu Y, Zheng C, Wei W, Liu Q. Management of intractable epistaxis: endoscopy or nasal packing? J Laryngol Otol 2012;126(5):482-6. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022215112000217
  11. Pletcher SD, Metson R. Endoscopic ligation of the anterior ethmoid artery. The Laryngoscope 2007;117(2):378-81. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlg.0000250778.29957.a1
  12. Jones N, Woolford T. Endoscopic ligation of anterior ethmoidal artery in treatment of epistaxis. Journal of Laryngology & Otology 2000;114(11):858-60. https://doi.org/10.1258/0022215001904167
  13. Lim SK, Joo EJ, Kang KS, Wee SJ, Kang JH, Park JM. Clinical analysis of refractory epistaxis. Korean Journal of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery 2005;48(9):1111-4.