References
- Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2018. CA Cancer J Clin 2018;68:7-30. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21442
- National Comprehensive Cancer Network (US). NCCN Clinical Practice Guideline in Oncology. Cervical cancer [Internet]. Fort Washington, PA: National Comprehensive Cancer Network; 2017 [cited 2018 May 8]. Available from: https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/cervical.pdf.
- Machida H, Blake EA, Eckhardt SE, Takiuchi T, Grubbs BH, Mikami M, et al. Trends in single women with malignancy of the uterine cervix in United States. J Gynecol Oncol 2018;29:e24. https://doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2018.29.e24
- Matsuo K, Machida H, Grubbs BH, Sood AK, Gershenson DM. Trends of low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma in the United States. J Gynecol Oncol 2018;29:e15. https://doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2018.29.e15
- Matsuo K, Ross MS, Machida H, Blake EA, Roman LD. Trends of uterine carcinosarcoma in the United States. J Gynecol Oncol 2018;29:e22. https://doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2018.29.e22
- Cui RR, Chen L, Tergas AI, Hou JY, St Clair CM, Neugut AI, et al. Trends in use and survival associated with fertility-sparing trachelectomy for young women with early-stage cervical cancer. Obstet Gynecol 2018;131:1085-94. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000002613
- Wethington SL, Sonoda Y, Park KJ, Alektiar KM, Tew WP, Chi DS, et al. Expanding the indications for radical trachelectomy: a report on 29 patients with stage IB1 tumors measuring 2 to 4 centimeters. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2013;23:1092-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/IGC.0b013e318296034e
- Tseng JH, Aloisi A, Sonoda Y, Gardner GJ, Zivanovic O, Abu-Rustum NR, et al. Less versus more radical surgery in stage IB1 cervical cancer: a population-based study of long-term survival. Gynecol Oncol 2018;150:44-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.04.571
- Pareja R, Rendon GJ, Vasquez M, Echeverri L, Sanz-Lomana CM, Ramirez PT. Immediate radical trachelectomy versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by conservative surgery for patients with stage IB1 cervical cancer with tumors 2cm or larger: a literature review and analysis of oncological and obstetrical outcomes. Gynecol Oncol 2015;137:574-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.03.051
- Ramirez RT, Frumovitz M, Pareja R, Lopez A, Vieira M, Ribeiro R, et al. Phase III randomized trial of laparoscopic or robotic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer: LACC Trial. Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Society of Gynecologic Oncologists; 2018 Mar 24-27; New Orleans, LA. Chicago, IL: Society of Gynecologic Oncology; 2018.
Cited by
- Characteristics and outcomes of reproductive-aged women with early-stage cervical cancer: trachelectomy vs hysterectomy vol.219, pp.5, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2018.08.020
- Tailoring radicality in early cervical cancer: how far can we go? vol.30, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2019.30.e30
- Trachelectomy for reproductive-aged women with early-stage cervical cancer: minimally invasive surgery versus laparotomy vol.220, pp.5, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2019.02.038
- Intestinal metastasis after total laparoscopic radical trachelectomy for stage IB1 cervical cancer: A case report vol.28, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gore.2019.02.001
- Fertility-sparing trachelectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: A proposal of an ideal candidate vol.156, pp.2, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.11.021
- Association between hospital surgical volume and perioperative outcomes of fertility-sparing trachelectomy for cervical cancer: A national study in the United States vol.157, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.01.015
- Safety evaluation of abdominal trachelectomy in patients with cervical tumors ≥2 cm: a single-institution, retrospective analysis vol.31, pp.4, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2020.31.e41
- 2018 FIGO Staging Classification for Cervical Cancer: Added Benefits of Imaging vol.40, pp.6, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2020200013
- Fertility-Sparing Surgery in Gynecologic Cancer: A Systematic Review vol.13, pp.5, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13051008